ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Four)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 8,160
And1: 2,886
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1761 » by Wolveswin » Wed Oct 7, 2020 5:27 pm

breatnach wrote:
minimus wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=20


Saved you a click: The answer is Brooklyn. PG would like to play behind KD and Kyrie.

Warriors would make a lot of sense. Stay in Cali (live in LA play in San Fran).

Clippers: George + Lou + Zubac FOR 3rd Team Star + Wiggins + Looney

3rd Team: Star (Beal or Holiday or ?) FOR #2 + Wolves 1st + Filler

Warriors: Wiggins + Looney + #2 + Wolves 1st FOR George + Lou (via TPE) + Zubac (via TPE)
Midw35t
Senior
Posts: 627
And1: 564
Joined: Jan 28, 2017
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1762 » by Midw35t » Wed Oct 7, 2020 6:34 pm

Wolveswin wrote:
breatnach wrote:
minimus wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=20


Saved you a click: The answer is Brooklyn. PG would like to play behind KD and Kyrie.

Warriors would make a lot of sense. Stay in Cali (live in LA play in San Fran).

Clippers: George + Lou + Zubac FOR 3rd Team Star + Wiggins + Looney

3rd Team: Star (Beal or Holiday or ?) FOR #2 + Wolves 1st + Filler

Warriors: Wiggins + Looney + #2 + Wolves 1st FOR George + Lou (via TPE) + Zubac (via TPE)


So PG is a toddler, hence the name acronym.
IceManBK1
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 330
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1763 » by IceManBK1 » Wed Oct 7, 2020 7:14 pm

Wolveswin wrote:
breatnach wrote:
minimus wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=20


Saved you a click: The answer is Brooklyn. PG would like to play behind KD and Kyrie.

Warriors would make a lot of sense. Stay in Cali (live in LA play in San Fran).

Clippers: George + Lou + Zubac FOR 3rd Team Star + Wiggins + Looney

3rd Team: Star (Beal or Holiday or ?) FOR #2 + Wolves 1st + Filler

Warriors: Wiggins + Looney + #2 + Wolves 1st FOR George + Lou (via TPE) + Zubac (via TPE)


He could come here to play behind Dlo and Towns. At his age, he could take a back seat and be our 3D guy. But we would literally have to ship out half of our team to match his salary lol.
ShayDee
Rookie
Posts: 1,177
And1: 266
Joined: Mar 30, 2020
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1764 » by ShayDee » Wed Oct 7, 2020 8:13 pm

Image

Deal? (If we don't get PG)

We get 17th pick and you get our 2021 first round pick
Baseline81
Analyst
Posts: 3,265
And1: 1,901
Joined: Jan 18, 2009

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1765 » by Baseline81 » Wed Oct 7, 2020 8:19 pm

ShayDee wrote:Image

Deal? (If we don't get PG)

We get 17th pick and you get our 2021 first round pick

Unfortunately, I am not able to see your image.
ShayDee
Rookie
Posts: 1,177
And1: 266
Joined: Mar 30, 2020
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1766 » by ShayDee » Wed Oct 7, 2020 8:25 pm

Baseline81 wrote:
ShayDee wrote:Image

Deal? (If we don't get PG)

We get 17th pick and you get our 2021 first round pick

Unfortunately, I am not able to see your image.


I'm suggesting James Johnson + #17 for GSW 2021 1st round pick(lottery protected)
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 2,861
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1767 » by Neeva » Wed Oct 7, 2020 8:32 pm

Tha 2021 warriors pick will most likely be late twenties in a draft that is strong in the top 10 then has a steep drop, why would the wolves do that?
SO_MONEY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,799
And1: 1,032
Joined: Sep 11, 2009
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1768 » by SO_MONEY » Wed Oct 7, 2020 8:57 pm

ShayDee wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:
ShayDee wrote:Image

Deal? (If we don't get PG)

We get 17th pick and you get our 2021 first round pick

Unfortunately, I am not able to see your image.


I'm suggesting James Johnson + #17 for GSW 2021 1st round pick(lottery protected)


Pass
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,884
And1: 6,223
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1769 » by KGdaBom » Wed Oct 7, 2020 10:02 pm

ShayDee wrote:Image

Deal? (If we don't get PG)

We get 17th pick and you get our 2021 first round pick

No Deal Howie.
ShayDee
Rookie
Posts: 1,177
And1: 266
Joined: Mar 30, 2020
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1770 » by ShayDee » Wed Oct 7, 2020 10:15 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
ShayDee wrote:Image

Deal? (If we don't get PG)

We get 17th pick and you get our 2021 first round pick

No Deal Howie.


Add a 2nd or 2?
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,354
And1: 19,385
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1771 » by shrink » Wed Oct 7, 2020 10:17 pm

ShayDee wrote:Image

Deal? (If we don't get PG)

We get 17th pick and you get our 2021 first round pick

I feel I have fully researched this topic, and my answer would be “no.”

The honest truth is, swapping Johnson for the TPE is a big help to both teams. For MIN, Johnson is not worth his $16 mil contract. For GSW, there aren’t many great players that can fit into the $17 mil Iguodala TPE. However, if they trade for Johnson (and I ran through all the possibilities, and he is the best player for this role), his expiring can bring back a player who makes 125% of his salary plus $100,000. This opens up a whole range of options that they are locked out of with just the TPE, including Rozier, LaVine, THJ, Gary Harris, Miles Turner, Sabonis, Fournier, Bogdanovic and Aaron Gordon. But you know, MIN would like access to these players too.

Many Wolves fans want to stick it to GSW since they need Johnson. However, we are never going to get a better offer for Johnson than a full TPE. This adds value to MIN. I think the two teams should make the deal straight up, with neither team trying to get over on the other. This deal helps them both get over on the other 28 teams.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1772 » by Jedzz » Thu Oct 8, 2020 2:16 am

Wolveswin wrote:
breatnach wrote:
minimus wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=20


Saved you a click: The answer is Brooklyn. PG would like to play behind KD and Kyrie.

Warriors would make a lot of sense. Stay in Cali (live in LA play in San Fran).

Clippers: George + Lou + Zubac FOR 3rd Team Star + Wiggins + Looney

3rd Team: Star (Beal or Holiday or ?) FOR #2 + Wolves 1st + Filler

Warriors: Wiggins + Looney + #2 + Wolves 1st FOR George + Lou (via TPE) + Zubac (via TPE)


What exactly would the Wolves get out of being involved in this and trading away the first?
Baseline81
Analyst
Posts: 3,265
And1: 1,901
Joined: Jan 18, 2009

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1773 » by Baseline81 » Thu Oct 8, 2020 2:51 am

Saw this on the Knicks forum:
Juco24 wrote:From the Hawks guy who seems to be connected.
* Dantoni seems set to Indy
* Indy is dangling Turner for the top pick... ala Ball
* Dantoni WANTS Ball
* Possible 4 team deal LAL/MIN/ATL/IND

Anyone know who he's referring to (Hawks guy)?
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 2,861
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1774 » by Neeva » Thu Oct 8, 2020 2:54 am

Turner aint worth the top pick.

Not sure how the lakers would fit into all this they literally have no assets..
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 2,861
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1775 » by Neeva » Thu Oct 8, 2020 2:56 am

Why doesnt Minny just hire Dantoni smh. It sucks being a fan of this organization sometimes. Current coach has done nothing.
Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 8,160
And1: 2,886
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1776 » by Wolveswin » Thu Oct 8, 2020 3:33 am

Jedzz wrote:
Wolveswin wrote:
breatnach wrote:
Saved you a click: The answer is Brooklyn. PG would like to play behind KD and Kyrie.

Warriors would make a lot of sense. Stay in Cali (live in LA play in San Fran).

Clippers: George + Lou + Zubac FOR 3rd Team Star + Wiggins + Looney

3rd Team: Star (Beal or Holiday or ?) FOR #2 + Wolves 1st + Filler

Warriors: Wiggins + Looney + #2 + Wolves 1st FOR George + Lou (via TPE) + Zubac (via TPE)


What exactly would the Wolves get out of being involved in this and trading away the first?

They don’t have a choice. They owe their 2021 1st to Warriors.
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1777 » by Jedzz » Thu Oct 8, 2020 3:38 am

Wolveswin wrote:
Jedzz wrote:
Wolveswin wrote:Warriors would make a lot of sense. Stay in Cali (live in LA play in San Fran).

Clippers: George + Lou + Zubac FOR 3rd Team Star + Wiggins + Looney

3rd Team: Star (Beal or Holiday or ?) FOR #2 + Wolves 1st + Filler

Warriors: Wiggins + Looney + #2 + Wolves 1st FOR George + Lou (via TPE) + Zubac (via TPE)


What exactly would the Wolves get out of being involved in this and trading away the first?

They don’t have a choice. They owe their 2021 1st to Warriors.


Now I'm understanding. I thought you were referring to this years #1 overall or #17 this year. But the Min 1st you have listed is next years first which Warriors already have. Gracias
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 2,861
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1778 » by Neeva » Thu Oct 8, 2020 3:49 am

I don’t know why trades that don’t involve the wolves are posted on here.
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,888
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1779 » by karch34 » Thu Oct 8, 2020 4:02 am

shrink wrote:
ShayDee wrote:Image

Deal? (If we don't get PG)

We get 17th pick and you get our 2021 first round pick

I feel I have fully researched this topic, and my answer would be “no.”

The honest truth is, swapping Johnson for the TPE is a big help to both teams. For MIN, Johnson is not worth his $16 mil contract. For GSW, there aren’t many great players that can fit into the $17 mil Iguodala TPE. However, if they trade for Johnson (and I ran through all the possibilities, and he is the best player for this role), his expiring can bring back a player who makes 125% of his salary plus $100,000. This opens up a whole range of options that they are locked out of with just the TPE, including Rozier, LaVine, THJ, Gary Harris, Miles Turner, Sabonis, Fournier, Bogdanovic and Aaron Gordon. But you know, MIN would like access to these players too.

Many Wolves fans want to stick it to GSW since they need Johnson. However, we are never going to get a better offer for Johnson than a full TPE. This adds value to MIN. I think the two teams should make the deal straight up, with neither team trying to get over on the other. This deal helps them both get over on the other 28 teams.

In a vacuum this trade is a no go. Now if were looking at next deal or two ahead then TPE along with Steipen rule not being a concern because we have a 2021 pick guaranteed opening up next move 17 this year for a 2021 unprotected could be beneficial.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,354
And1: 19,385
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Four) 

Post#1780 » by shrink » Thu Oct 8, 2020 4:16 am

karch34 wrote:
shrink wrote:
ShayDee wrote:Image

Deal? (If we don't get PG)

We get 17th pick and you get our 2021 first round pick

I feel I have fully researched this topic, and my answer would be “no.”

The honest truth is, swapping Johnson for the TPE is a big help to both teams. For MIN, Johnson is not worth his $16 mil contract. For GSW, there aren’t many great players that can fit into the $17 mil Iguodala TPE. However, if they trade for Johnson (and I ran through all the possibilities, and he is the best player for this role), his expiring can bring back a player who makes 125% of his salary plus $100,000. This opens up a whole range of options that they are locked out of with just the TPE, including Rozier, LaVine, THJ, Gary Harris, Miles Turner, Sabonis, Fournier, Bogdanovic and Aaron Gordon. But you know, MIN would like access to these players too.

Many Wolves fans want to stick it to GSW since they need Johnson. However, we are never going to get a better offer for Johnson than a full TPE. This adds value to MIN. I think the two teams should make the deal straight up, with neither team trying to get over on the other. This deal helps them both get over on the other 28 teams.

In a vacuum this trade is a no go. Now if were looking at next deal or two ahead then TPE along with Steipen rule not being a concern because we have a 2021 pick guaranteed opening up next move 17 this year for a 2021 unprotected could be beneficial.

$16 mil in cap space is simply a much better trade asset than $16 mil of James Johnson.

If last year is any indication, I trust Rosas to make trades.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves