B00Yah wrote:ItsDanger wrote:Current Ontario hospitalizations in last 4 days: 206, 225, 213, 217
Active cases:  5442,5662, 5754, 5697
That's about 3.8% hospitalization rate.   Early, August was roughly 5%.  Early July was 7.5%.  Early June was 17-20%.  Absolute hospital numbers were higher than current.  The increase in number of tests does not explain the difference.
This is also the normal influenza season where hospitalizations would normally increase congruently.  Need more detail but next 10 days or so will be very telling on the consistency of the data from early spring.  Right now, there is a clear trend away from spring pattern.
Notice how the news only focuses on cases, not fatalities.
Also WHO has stated lockdowns do more harm than good 
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/who-flip-flops-urges-world-leaders-stop-using-lockdowns-fight-covid-contagionAlso masks masks don't appear to have impact on cases 
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/10/09/no-spike-in-florida-coronavirus-cases-despite-lack-of-enforceable-mask-mandate/Science is being ignored and suppressed. There is no longer a pandemic. However, that narrative continues because it's politically expedient.
 
1.  You got your source from breitbart??  There might be a non-scientific political leaninng there I believe.
2.  Zerohedge states that lockdowns should not be the primary means to fight the virus.  Unless systems are stressed.  Nobody is arguing this really.  If numbers go up and systems are stressed you lock it down.  Also this article is applauding Donald Trump for what he's done.  really?  Really??  REALLLLYYYY????
This is the non-biased article.
https://pandemic.internationalsos.com/reports/who-official-states-lockdown-policies-not-helpful-to-public-health-oct-11-2020The World Health Organization’s special envoy on COVID-19 Dr. David Nabarro in an interview stated lockdowns are not helpful as 
the primary means to control COVID-19. He advocated
 a middle path which means holding the virus at bay whilst keeping economy and social life going. It would require 
"high level of organisation by governments and remarkable degree of engagement of people" with robust infectious disease control services or public health. He emphasised on combining of
 several measures such as "physical distancing , face protection, hygiene, isolating the ill and protecting the vulnerable" as an effective method. The article you wrote before said no face protection but this one from the WHO says 'face protection'.  Also this article supports the Great Barrington Declaration which states the following:
"Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. 
Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity."
The problem is people are not following simple hygiene measures and young people are spreading it.  Why becasue they are not doing physical distancing, face protection, hygiene that needs to be done.  So there are steps this to everything.  Do these things then focus protection works.
I'm not a fan of people posting nonsense like we don't need to wear masks or they have no impact.  That's a lie.  Or constructing arguments that nobody is arguing.  No-one wants lockdowns, everyone knows it's harmful.  The question is if it's necessary and the WHO is saying if the 
system is not stressed find a different way of controlling the virus.