LoveMyRaps wrote:pr0gr4m wrote:Sexton and Garland suck.
Very false.
Yeah Garland's shooting below 50 TS%
Sexton is a huge negative on the floor.
Moderators: HiJiNX, niQ, Morris_Shatford, DG88, Reeko, lebron stopper, 7 Footer, Duffman100
LoveMyRaps wrote:pr0gr4m wrote:Sexton and Garland suck.
Very false.
bballsparkin wrote:I just checked Favors three point %. He shot 14.3% last year. And his FT% was only .563%. Way down from his career average FT% though. He's still a good option if on a reasonable deal. But yeah, very unlikely to be starting.
Raps getting Christian Wood seems unlikely.9. Detroit Pistons give Christian Wood $60 million for three years
In his final 22 games, Christian Wood shot 56 percent from the field and just over 40 percent from 3-point range. In the NBA Finals, Anthony Davis shot 57 percent from the field and 42 percent from behind the arc. Now, Wood can't touch Davis from a talent perspective, but it goes to show how rare it is to find a big man that is both a dominant roller and a dependable shooter. It makes everything easier offensively, and the Pistons will have to pay to keep it. Something in the neighborhood of $20 million per year is not farfetched.
https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/bold-nba-offseason-predictions-for-all-30-teams-lakers-add-third-scorer-76ers-trade-for-chris-paul/
Psubs wrote:bballsparkin wrote:I just checked Favors three point %. He shot 14.3% last year. And his FT% was only .563%. Way down from his career average FT% though. He's still a good option if on a reasonable deal. But yeah, very unlikely to be starting.
Raps getting Christian Wood seems unlikely.9. Detroit Pistons give Christian Wood $60 million for three years
In his final 22 games, Christian Wood shot 56 percent from the field and just over 40 percent from 3-point range. In the NBA Finals, Anthony Davis shot 57 percent from the field and 42 percent from behind the arc. Now, Wood can't touch Davis from a talent perspective, but it goes to show how rare it is to find a big man that is both a dominant roller and a dependable shooter. It makes everything easier offensively, and the Pistons will have to pay to keep it. Something in the neighborhood of $20 million per year is not farfetched.
https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/bold-nba-offseason-predictions-for-all-30-teams-lakers-add-third-scorer-76ers-trade-for-chris-paul/
Wood should get at least Capella money.
Tristan Thompson might be able to develop a 3pt shot. He shot 9 for 23, which is such a small sample size, though it's not like you can get lucky shooting NBA 3's right? He should've been working like mad at it to prolong his prime years.
Wide open on both, but looks more comfortable than Marc did in the bubble.
A little closer coverage on these.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:FVV for 20M or Christian Wood for $20M?
pr0gr4m wrote:LoveMyRaps wrote:pr0gr4m wrote:Sexton and Garland suck.
Very false.
Yeah Garland's shooting below 50 TS%
Sexton is a huge negative on the floor.
Raptaz wrote:with all the talks that the 1st and 2nd pick overall are available is it realistic for a three way trade:
Toronto - receives Bradley Beal
Washington - receives 1st overall pick
Minnesota (article said they are looking for win now player) - receives FVV
does this make any sense, and would salaries even line up?
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:Raptaz wrote:with all the talks that the 1st and 2nd pick overall are available is it realistic for a three way trade:
Toronto - receives Bradley Beal
Washington - receives 1st overall pick
Minnesota (article said they are looking for win now player) - receives FVV
does this make any sense, and would salaries even line up?
why won't Minny just trade Beal for the #1 straight up. why involve the Raptors? Beal is helluva better than FVV and is a win-now player, salaries aside ofc. just doesn't make sense to cut in the Raptors.
Raptaz wrote:LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:Raptaz wrote:with all the talks that the 1st and 2nd pick overall are available is it realistic for a three way trade:
Toronto - receives Bradley Beal
Washington - receives 1st overall pick
Minnesota (article said they are looking for win now player) - receives FVV
does this make any sense, and would salaries even line up?
why won't Minny just trade Beal for the #1 straight up. why involve the Raptors? Beal is helluva better than FVV and is a win-now player, salaries aside ofc. just doesn't make sense to cut in the Raptors.
masai magic--maybe need for PG over SG?
Raptaz wrote:Raptaz wrote:LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:
why won't Minny just trade Beal for the #1 straight up. why involve the Raptors? Beal is helluva better than FVV and is a win-now player, salaries aside ofc. just doesn't make sense to cut in the Raptors.
masai magic--maybe need for PG over SG?
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:Raptaz wrote:Raptaz wrote:
masai magic--maybe need for PG over SG?
Minny already has D'angelo Russel, a PG. Beal would be too perfect at SG.
gerrit4 wrote:LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:Raptaz wrote:
Minny already has D'angelo Russel, a PG. Beal would be too perfect at SG.
Not to mention, I'd argue that Beal has no fit issues with just about any player in the league. He's a great passer and shooter.
He'd be great (a better fit than Russ anyways) beside Harden, he'd be great with Klay, etc. I can't think of one team in the league that Beal wouldn't make better...
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
Zeno wrote:Here is my favourite Norm trade which I think serves the aims of both clubs pretty perfectly.
To Grizz: Norm, McCaw, Stanley
To Raps: Dieng, Grayson Allen, #40
Salaries are pretty much dead on for next year. Opens 2021 space. Dieng is expiring but serviceable plus really not needed in Memphis. Grayson Allen is a 2nd draft guy I don’t love but worth a shot. Dieng and Norm have the same agent and this is an improved situation for both. 40th pick is great range to get another guy to develop on a cheap deal. Maybe try to get another future 2nd from Memphis.
Zeno wrote:Here is my favourite Norm trade which I think serves the aims of both clubs pretty perfectly.
To Grizz: Norm, McCaw, Stanley
To Raps: Dieng, Grayson Allen, #40
Salaries are pretty much dead on for next year. Opens 2021 space. Dieng is expiring but serviceable plus really not needed in Memphis. Grayson Allen is a 2nd draft guy I don’t love but worth a shot. Dieng and Norm have the same agent and this is an improved situation for both. 40th pick is great range to get another guy to develop on a cheap deal. Maybe try to get another future 2nd from Memphis.
Klaw22 wrote:Zeno wrote:Here is my favourite Norm trade which I think serves the aims of both clubs pretty perfectly.
To Grizz: Norm, McCaw, Stanley
To Raps: Dieng, Grayson Allen, #40
Salaries are pretty much dead on for next year. Opens 2021 space. Dieng is expiring but serviceable plus really not needed in Memphis. Grayson Allen is a 2nd draft guy I don’t love but worth a shot. Dieng and Norm have the same agent and this is an improved situation for both. 40th pick is great range to get another guy to develop on a cheap deal. Maybe try to get another future 2nd from Memphis.
Why trade Norm for Dieng, Grayson and #40? I mean he opts out 2021, that's for sure. Doesn't make sense just to get a expiring Dieng.
Red_Claw wrote:Klaw22 wrote:Zeno wrote:Here is my favourite Norm trade which I think serves the aims of both clubs pretty perfectly.
To Grizz: Norm, McCaw, Stanley
To Raps: Dieng, Grayson Allen, #40
Salaries are pretty much dead on for next year. Opens 2021 space. Dieng is expiring but serviceable plus really not needed in Memphis. Grayson Allen is a 2nd draft guy I don’t love but worth a shot. Dieng and Norm have the same agent and this is an improved situation for both. 40th pick is great range to get another guy to develop on a cheap deal. Maybe try to get another future 2nd from Memphis.
Why trade Norm for Dieng, Grayson and #40? I mean he opts out 2021, that's for sure. Doesn't make sense just to get a expiring Dieng.
Dieng is a solid role playing center. Rebounds, blocks, can pass here and there and hits the 3 on occasion. He's in a contract year and we currently have no center. Thats why.
douggood wrote:Red_Claw wrote:Klaw22 wrote:
Why trade Norm for Dieng, Grayson and #40? I mean he opts out 2021, that's for sure. Doesn't make sense just to get a expiring Dieng.
Dieng is a solid role playing center. Rebounds, blocks, can pass here and there and hits the 3 on occasion. He's in a contract year and we currently have no center. Thats why.
dieng makes 17.25 million, i rather throw that number at marc gasol for 1 year and keep norm.
all this trade does it create a bigger leak while plugging in a small leak. Centers like dieng can be had on the free agent market for mle level.