Alize wrote:I also think the 2012 OKC is a better team than anything Jordan faced in the 90s.OdomFan wrote:homecourtloss wrote:
2012 “Young.” Yeah, they were, but literally more talent than any team Jordan played in the finals. That team also had a +6.44 SRS and would be +9.15 the very next year (GOAT level SRS) but were derailed by injuries.
2014 “Aging Spurs.” OK. Aging is bad, young is bad. I guess playing 35 year old Stockton and Malone is ok, though.
2016 faced “crippled and unhealthy team.” That seems real objective
Out of their 16 Finals’ opponents, LeBron faced the 6 best and probably at least the 7 or 8 of the 10 best.
You'd guess right considering Michael Jordan was also 34-35 in that 97 and 98 Finals series. Lebron on the other hand was much younger than the aged Spurs players being brought up here.
Lol at the 2012 Thunder being better than every finals opponent Jordan face. Just another example of ignorant incorrect hot takes.
Sent from my SM-G950F using RealGM mobile app
Never said he was the only one that thought that, but great. You can both be wrong together.