Combining feedback from buzzards thread of vuc to bucks (need better guard/halfcourt play) and the other feedback from vuc for wiggins/2 (gsw need better wing, not center)
GSW trade: wiggins, looney, #2, Minn 2021 1st
GSW receive middleton, brolo (tpe)
Orlando trade: vucevic, ross
Orlando receives: wiggins, #2
Milwaukee trades middleton, bledsoe, brolo
Milwaukee receives: holiday, vucevic, hart, ross
New Orleans trade holiday, hart
New orleans receive looney, bledsoe, minn 2021 1st
Why for gsw: complete their starting lineup with an allstar wing and cost controlled starting C
Why for orlando: start their rebuild
Why for milwaukee: improve guard and center play while getting some good shooters for their wings
Why for NOP: sell holiday for a nice future pick
Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe
Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,735
- And1: 13,685
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,674
- And1: 27,261
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
Breaking up Middleton into lesser parts is always a no. Stop trying it.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,324
- And1: 8,394
- Joined: Jan 21, 2017
-
Re: Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
I think MIL makes out well. NOLA debatable- as good as Jrue is, they may not really need him and that's a nice pick. ORL- I like, but others may not. GSW is certainly better than they were prior to trade but they are giving up two choice picks-they could maybe do better....If I were GSW, I trade directly with ORL as is, take Vuc and Ross who will both immediately and significantly contribute. Then I look elsewhere with the valuable Minny pick for another solid piece...but good OP...Middleton is very good, not great. Complementary player-not a star on his own, IMO. IMO, GSW looks to grab multiple strong complementary players...Middleton (like Jrue) may reside in that middle ground where he demands a big return but isn't going to lift you like a Beal-level guy.
Re: Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,332
- And1: 5,945
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
Skybox wrote:I think MIL makes out well. NOLA debatable- as good as Jrue is, they may not really need him and that's a nice pick. ORL- I like, but others may not. GSW is certainly better than they were prior to trade but they are giving up two choice picks-they could maybe do better....If I were GSW, I trade directly with ORL as is, take Vuc and Ross who will both immediately and significantly contribute. Then I look elsewhere with the valuable Minny pick for another solid piece...but good OP...Middleton is very good, not great. Complementary player-not a star on his own, IMO. IMO, GSW looks to grab multiple strong complementary players...Middleton (like Jrue) may reside in that middle ground where he demands a big return but isn't going to lift you like a Beal-level guy.
Strongly disagree from a Warriors perspective - I'd MUCH rather have Middleton and BroLo than Vuc and Ross.
Re: Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,324
- And1: 8,394
- Joined: Jan 21, 2017
-
Re: Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
gswhoops wrote:Skybox wrote:I think MIL makes out well. NOLA debatable- as good as Jrue is, they may not really need him and that's a nice pick. ORL- I like, but others may not. GSW is certainly better than they were prior to trade but they are giving up two choice picks-they could maybe do better....If I were GSW, I trade directly with ORL as is, take Vuc and Ross who will both immediately and significantly contribute. Then I look elsewhere with the valuable Minny pick for another solid piece...but good OP...Middleton is very good, not great. Complementary player-not a star on his own, IMO. IMO, GSW looks to grab multiple strong complementary players...Middleton (like Jrue) may reside in that middle ground where he demands a big return but isn't going to lift you like a Beal-level guy.
Strongly disagree from a Warriors perspective - I'd MUCH rather have Middleton and BroLo than Vuc and Ross.
In a vacuum, I agree but, IMO the difference is not enough to include that MIN pick as well.
Re: Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 34,332
- And1: 5,945
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
-
Re: Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
Skybox wrote:gswhoops wrote:Skybox wrote:I think MIL makes out well. NOLA debatable- as good as Jrue is, they may not really need him and that's a nice pick. ORL- I like, but others may not. GSW is certainly better than they were prior to trade but they are giving up two choice picks-they could maybe do better....If I were GSW, I trade directly with ORL as is, take Vuc and Ross who will both immediately and significantly contribute. Then I look elsewhere with the valuable Minny pick for another solid piece...but good OP...Middleton is very good, not great. Complementary player-not a star on his own, IMO. IMO, GSW looks to grab multiple strong complementary players...Middleton (like Jrue) may reside in that middle ground where he demands a big return but isn't going to lift you like a Beal-level guy.
Strongly disagree from a Warriors perspective - I'd MUCH rather have Middleton and BroLo than Vuc and Ross.
In a vacuum, I agree but, IMO the difference is not enough to include that MIN pick as well.
Yeah sorry, should have been clear - strongly prefer Wiggins/2/MIN 21 for Midd/BroLo to Wiggins/2 for Vuc/Ross, even accounting for the extra cost
Re: Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
- Ducklett
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,023
- And1: 5,485
- Joined: Jul 17, 2012
-
Re: Vuc for 2+Wiggins again (GSW/ORL/MIL/NOP)
I might be in the minority but I would love to watch the Bucks with Vuc and Ross. I think they would be much better off but I am abnormally low on both Bledsoe and Middleton.
Return to Trades and Transactions