Lukeem wrote:VanWest82 wrote:Lukeem wrote:Jordan added himself to a 55 win team, they also added along with him the best rebounder / a top defender / hall of famer and another strong role player.
You can keep saying this over and over but no one's buying it. MJ joined a .500 team. That's what they were when he came back in 95. And yes they brought in Rodman the next year who was turning 35, a giant minus on offense, and on his way out of the league. He was a far cry from HoGrant who was in his prime and had the best season of his career on that 55 win team. Rodman proved to be a nice piece in 96, and was still ok in 97, then a disaster in 98. Lets stop pretending like he was this godsend for them.
You’re pretending like Horace Grant was a godsend more than I’m pretending the guy who led the league in rebounding by a wide margin each of those three years is. Rodman also was over 1.5 offensive ws each of those three years when zone defence still wasn’t allowed so his lack of shooting couldn’t be exposed.
Bulls won 55 games led by Pippen and were contenders, next year they were above 500 before Jordan joined them.
If you want to act like that bulls team was worse than the lakers that lebron joined you’re alone on homer Jordan island there.
I never said anything about Lakers. And yes, 94 HoGrant > late 90s Rodman. (Edit: Dennis had a TOV% in the 25-28 range all three years. A lot of those offensive rebounds ended in turnovers. Even though far removed from his DPOY days, he was still a great defender and energy player when he tried. I'm not disputing that. But Grant was a good all around basketball player, and he wasn't padding his stats in 94 like Dennis did with defensive rebounds.)














