minimus wrote:
Quick, strong, athletic, improving shooter, winner. Would love to draft him.
I'd love to draft him too...If he falls to 17 and we take him, i'll cry. He's probably going to rise up to the lotto
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
minimus wrote:
Quick, strong, athletic, improving shooter, winner. Would love to draft him.
theGreatRC wrote:minimus wrote:
Quick, strong, athletic, improving shooter, winner. Would love to draft him.
I'd love to draft him too...If he falls to 17 and we take him, i'll cry. He's probably going to rise up to the lotto
Nick K wrote:minimus wrote:
Quick, strong, athletic, improving shooter, winner. Would love to draft him.
He does look good. I love those Kentucky guys. Cal knows talent and really develops guys for the pro's.
I wish they'd at least show them missing a shot or two. Guys look extra good when they never miss. It's funny how their value goes down when they clank a few.

Neeva wrote:theGreatRC wrote:minimus wrote:
Quick, strong, athletic, improving shooter, winner. Would love to draft him.
I'd love to draft him too...If he falls to 17 and we take him, i'll cry. He's probably going to rise up to the lotto
Wolves need someone that can Attack and create for himself like Maxey. I think he really fits next to Dlo, Beasley or Ball as well. Fingers crossed.
minimus wrote:
Thats an NBA ready body
minimus wrote:karch34 wrote:minimus wrote:
Yes, I thought the same. A tough, athletic 3&D who can defend SF/SG.
He intrigues me as I think team was really more built around Mannion and Lyles. Probably a terrible comparison, but Booker wasn't the focus his one year with Kentucky behind Harrison twins, Stein, and KAT (who's role was limited vs. his skills). Granted KY is a different story as far as 1 and done players "breaking out", but he does strike me as someone who could be a steal based on where he's drafted.
He said in interview that his current weight is 220lbs. I believe that he can play full time SF for us. Although he lacks creativity with ball in his hands, his footwork while shooting threes is better than expected. He could be a steal at #17, but I am afraid that he stock is raising.
minimus wrote:
Thats an NBA ready body
thinktank wrote:Neeva wrote:theGreatRC wrote:
I'd love to draft him too...If he falls to 17 and we take him, i'll cry. He's probably going to rise up to the lotto
Wolves need someone that can Attack and create for himself like Maxey. I think he really fits next to Dlo, Beasley or Ball as well. Fingers crossed.
Agreed. He’s a must select if available at 17. No way he can be. No way.
Dewey wrote:minimus wrote:
Thats an NBA ready body
Head to Head ...
Smith = 16 pts ... 5/10 (1/3, 3pt) ... 5/6 FT's ... 12 rebounds
Oturo = 28 pts ... 10/13 (2/3, 3pt) ... 6/6 FT's ... 11 rebounds
Both interesting prospects sophomore years:
Oturo ... So. Center (6'10, 240 lbs) and averages 20-11 ... 56% FG and 36% 3pt%
Smith ... So. PF (6'10, 225 lbs) and averages 15-10 ... 53% GF and 36% 3pt%
Oturo > Smith in every statistical category and one of the top big men in the country. Both worth a shot.
minimus wrote:
His shot is impressive for 6'10" guy. Never understood what happened with him this year, he has so much talent, but failed hard. Mentality? Immaturity? He looks like Jon Isaac based on physical tools, but as skillset he is more Rashard Lewis type of offensive minded player.
urinesane wrote:Big points he brought up were play making, shot selection, and shot mechanics... so does that mean Ball isn't the #1?
Baseline81 wrote:urinesane wrote:Big points he brought up were play making, shot selection, and shot mechanics... so does that mean Ball isn't the #1?
I wouldn't say so.
There was a question brought up to Rosas about form impacting a prospect's shot (9:15 of the video). Ball immediately came to mind as I'm sure others as well. Rosas even chuckled at it. Didn't sound as if he'd shy away from a prospect because of it -- says there's no perfect shot.
urinesane wrote:Baseline81 wrote:urinesane wrote:Big points he brought up were play making, shot selection, and shot mechanics... so does that mean Ball isn't the #1?
I wouldn't say so.
There was a question brought up to Rosas about form impacting a prospect's shot (9:15 of the video). Ball immediately came to mind as I'm sure others as well. Rosas even chuckled at it. Didn't sound as if he'd shy away from a prospect because of it -- says there's no perfect shot.
It was a general statement though, I wonder if a chest pass for a shot is cool with him...
minimus wrote:
Quick, strong, athletic, improving shooter, winner. Would love to draft him.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves