1. LeBron James
2. Michael Jordan
3. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
4. Bill Russell
5. Tim Duncan
6. Wilt Chamberlain
7. Magic Johnson
8. ???
Target stop time will be ~3pm EST on Friday.
Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier
DQuinn1575 wrote:No change for me from my last ballot:
1. Shaq
2. Bird
3.Hakeem
Shaq and Bird are the two most dominant players left - Shaq with sheer power was a force the league has rarely seen, and it wound up in 3 straight titles. Bird could do everything, he shot, passed, rebounded as well as virtually everyone, and played effective defense. I'm picking Shaq over Bird because of length of prime seasons. I'm going with Hakeem for 3rd.
Owly wrote:DQuinn1575 wrote:No change for me from my last ballot:
1. Shaq
2. Bird
3.Hakeem
Shaq and Bird are the two most dominant players left - Shaq with sheer power was a force the league has rarely seen, and it wound up in 3 straight titles. Bird could do everything, he shot, passed, rebounded as well as virtually everyone, and played effective defense. I'm picking Shaq over Bird because of length of prime seasons. I'm going with Hakeem for 3rd.
As far as "do it all"/well rounded players this will always be a bit subjective/woolly in what we mean by this but any thoughts on Robertson.
Bird has a couple of pretty monstrous TS Add years ('87, '88 - his 50-40-90 years where he also increased his 3 point volume), with a peak slightly above some with a clearly better career number and average (slight peak edge on Nowitzki). But Robertson has a significant advantage at peak and demolishes him prime for prime.
Passing skill is hard to compare on limited footage. But Robertson in his prime sometimes had a large advantage in assists on the next player on the board apg-wise ('62, '64, '65, to a lesser extent '69) other times Rodgers was close ('61, '66) or ahead ('63, '67) and led the best offenses in the league.
Robertson's rebounding is overstated by high minutes, high pace and initially low shooting percentages. I think he's the best rebounding guard of his era. Even position adjusted, I think this would still be an advantage to Bird.
My guess is young-ish Bird may have peaked as a better defender. But even ignoring the really painful years at the end, he seems to lose some mobility. A lot of noise/range/guesswork on the D for both of these guys for me.
Personally, I lean Robertson.
DQuinn1575 wrote:
Oscar to me is very intriguing. In 1986 there was a poll done by the Dallas newspaper of 60 experts - I can dig it out, but Oscar finished second in the GOAT voting to Kareem. All through his career and for years after he was considered the best non center ever. Sometime between the mid 80s and today a shift has occurred where what people who watched and followed the game's opinions differ from what is thought of as present day. One of the players who lost standing would be Oscar - during Magic's prime the thought of him being as good as Oscar was would be considered ridiculous. In an era where big men always won MVP, and everyone thought you had to have a big man, he was voted MVP over both Wilt and Russell in their prime. He is probably one championship in the 60s away from being the Top Tier - although if Garnett is getting serious consideration, and I have Oscar ahead of Garnett.
DQuinn1575 wrote:Owly wrote:DQuinn1575 wrote:No change for me from my last ballot:
1. Shaq
2. Bird
3.Hakeem
Shaq and Bird are the two most dominant players left - Shaq with sheer power was a force the league has rarely seen, and it wound up in 3 straight titles. Bird could do everything, he shot, passed, rebounded as well as virtually everyone, and played effective defense. I'm picking Shaq over Bird because of length of prime seasons. I'm going with Hakeem for 3rd.
As far as "do it all"/well rounded players this will always be a bit subjective/woolly in what we mean by this but any thoughts on Robertson.
Bird has a couple of pretty monstrous TS Add years ('87, '88 - his 50-40-90 years where he also increased his 3 point volume), with a peak slightly above some with a clearly better career number and average (slight peak edge on Nowitzki). But Robertson has a significant advantage at peak and demolishes him prime for prime.
Passing skill is hard to compare on limited footage. But Robertson in his prime sometimes had a large advantage in assists on the next player on the board apg-wise ('62, '64, '65, to a lesser extent '69) other times Rodgers was close ('61, '66) or ahead ('63, '67) and led the best offenses in the league.
Robertson's rebounding is overstated by high minutes, high pace and initially low shooting percentages. I think he's the best rebounding guard of his era. Even position adjusted, I think this would still be an advantage to Bird.
My guess is young-ish Bird may have peaked as a better defender. But even ignoring the really painful years at the end, he seems to lose some mobility. A lot of noise/range/guesswork on the D for both of these guys for me.
Personally, I lean Robertson.
Oscar to me is very intriguing. In 1986 there was a poll done by the Dallas newspaper of 60 experts - I can dig it out, but Oscar finished second in the GOAT voting to Kareem. All through his career and for years after he was considered the best non center ever. Sometime between the mid 80s and today a shift has occurred where what people who watched and followed the game's opinions differ from what is thought of as present day. One of the players who lost standing would be Oscar - during Magic's prime the thought of him being as good as Oscar was would be considered ridiculous. In an era where big men always won MVP, and everyone thought you had to have a big man, he was voted MVP over both Wilt and Russell in their prime. He is probably one championship in the 60s away from being the Top Tier - although if Garnett is getting serious consideration, and I have Oscar ahead of Garnett.
70sFan wrote:When we talk about all-around players, Jerry West is usually overlooked one. We all know about his offensive skillset, but unlike most players in conversation West was also one of the best defenders ever at his position.
~Regarding Denver Nuggets, May 2025hardenASG13 wrote:They are better than the teammates of SGA, Giannis, Luka, Brunson, Curry etc. so far.
SHAQ32 wrote:Yet another antishaq post: Another thing I keep in mind is Shaq and LA's glory years coincided with a relative lull for the league and competition. The NBA needed franchise players but had to settle on Jalen Rose and Allan Houston.
SHAQ32 wrote:Yet another antishaq post: Another thing I keep in mind is Shaq and LA's glory years coincided with a relative lull for the league and competition. The NBA needed franchise players but had to settle on Jalen Rose and Allan Houston.
Owly wrote:
Would be interested to see that poll. Two 90s authors (Bjarkman and Taragano) each ranked Robertson 1 overall and 1999 AP poll (not limited to pros years iirc) had him second to MJ. Whilst those are the high-water marks they are illustrative of the slide you note, most notably versus Magic and Bird.
Like Garnett (though with cruder tools - i.e. WOWY) we have evidence of high impact (and not so good teammates) for prime and peak prouction years on their respective first teams.