Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
rammagen wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Capn'O wrote:
Yes! The 'Os have actually discussed the Ottawa area seriously this year. NS is a place of interest as well.
You could go drink home brew with King of Canada. NS is one of the prettiest places on earth. Cold as hell in winter, but glorious Summers
I could do Canada do they need dbas?
Fat Kat wrote:I don’t know who needs to hear this but there should be no compromise with Nazis, racist, and baby snatchers. None.
Fat Kat wrote:I don’t know who needs to hear this but there should be no compromise with Nazis, racist, and baby snatchers. None.
Clyde_Style wrote:rammagen wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
You could go drink home brew with King of Canada. NS is one of the prettiest places on earth. Cold as hell in winter, but glorious Summers
I could do Canada do they need dbas?
Dynamic Bling Atlanta Style?
I wasn't sure what he meant either.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
robillionaire wrote:
Eliminating the electoral college would just be unrigging a system that only works in favor of the GOP because slavery. Even trump was crying about it back in 2012 when he thought that Romney was going to win the popular vote and lose the election (he didn't)
Fat Kat wrote:I don’t know who needs to hear this but there should be no compromise with Nazis, racist, and baby snatchers. None.
SA37 wrote:robillionaire wrote:
Eliminating the electoral college would just be unrigging a system that only works in favor of the GOP because slavery. Even trump was crying about it back in 2012 when he thought that Romney was going to win the popular vote and lose the election (he didn't)
The only reason the Dems want to abolish the EC is because they know demographic shifts have made it extremely difficult for Republicans to win in an election based on the popular vote; it's not surprsing at all that the party that would have won the last ~7 elections in a popular vote system is calling for that to be the way the president is chosen.
The claim that the EC is "rigged" in favor of the GOP is completely unfounded.
robillionaire wrote:SA37 wrote:Capn'O wrote:
Major American cities fundamentally want something different from the rest of the country and I don't know how to reconcile that.
Compromise.
The whole goal (in theory) of the system is to force opposing sides compromise. Democrats spent a good portion of the time leading up to the election talking about essentially rigging the system in their favor by eliminating the Electoral College, making DC and PR states, and expanding the courts to give themselves an advantage. When they lost in 2016 -- and even this election that is neck and neck -- they have resorted to conspiracy theories (Russian meddling) or pathetic excuses (social media) for why they haven't been able to convince the public to give them the power they need to implement their policies or their candidates.
Identity politics, belief that Democrats are morally and ethically superior to the other side, this belief that the other side "owes" thel something, and an inability to compromise on certain major issues will likely continue to divide the Democrats and push them away from compromise that could otherwise lead to the implementation of policy.
Politics is tricky, but Americain institutions have brought about major changes to Americain society, even if those changes came about too slowly or too quickly for some.
Eliminating the electoral college would just be unrigging a system that only works in favor of the GOP because slavery. Even trump was crying about it back in 2012 when he thought that Romney was going to win the popular vote and lose the election (he didn't)
There is so much projecting in this post. Who right now is pushing conspiracies of voter fraud and literally trying to stop votes from being counted? After they couldn't shut down the post office enough? They have done everything they can to suppress this vote, and cheat. Openly
robillionaire wrote:GONYK wrote:Well, that was certainly a ride, huh boys?
The ride is just getting started
It was their plan all along. We are in the endgame now
Oscirus wrote:robillionaire wrote:If Trump does lose, and assuming we can get him out of there, I think Trump runs again in 2024. Forget any idea that they're distancing from this. This solidified him and his ideology as interchangeable with the party.
Trump likes money more than power. I believe he'll prefer talking **** on fox to being president.
? rammagen wrote:robillionaire wrote:SA37 wrote:
Compromise.
The whole goal (in theory) of the system is to force opposing sides compromise. Democrats spent a good portion of the time leading up to the election talking about essentially rigging the system in their favor by eliminating the Electoral College, making DC and PR states, and expanding the courts to give themselves an advantage. When they lost in 2016 -- and even this election that is neck and neck -- they have resorted to conspiracy theories (Russian meddling) or pathetic excuses (social media) for why they haven't been able to convince the public to give them the power they need to implement their policies or their candidates.
Identity politics, belief that Democrats are morally and ethically superior to the other side, this belief that the other side "owes" thel something, and an inability to compromise on certain major issues will likely continue to divide the Democrats and push them away from compromise that could otherwise lead to the implementation of policy.
Politics is tricky, but Americain institutions have brought about major changes to Americain society, even if those changes came about too slowly or too quickly for some.
Eliminating the electoral college would just be unrigging a system that only works in favor of the GOP because slavery. Even trump was crying about it back in 2012 when he thought that Romney was going to win the popular vote and lose the election (he didn't)
There is so much projecting in this post. Who right now is pushing conspiracies of voter fraud and literally trying to stop votes from being counted? After they couldn't shut down the post office enough? They have done everything they can to suppress this vote, and cheat. Openly
Funny he liked it enough last time. the man is a liar
GONYK wrote:?s=19
King of Canada wrote:SA37 wrote:Capn'O wrote:
Major American cities fundamentally want something different from the rest of the country and I don't know how to reconcile that.
Compromise.
The whole goal (in theory) of the system is to force opposing sides compromise. Democrats spent a good portion of the time leading up to the election talking about essentially rigging the system in their favor by eliminating the Electoral College, making DC and PR states, and expanding the courts to give themselves an advantage. When they lost in 2016 -- and even this election that is neck and neck -- they have resorted to conspiracy theories (Russian meddling) or pathetic excuses (social media) for why they haven't been able to convince the public to give them the power they need to implement their policies or their candidates.
Identity politics, belief that Democrats are morally and ethically superior to the other side, this belief that the other side "owes" thel something, and an inability to compromise on certain major issues will likely continue to divide the Democrats and push them away from compromise that could otherwise lead to the implementation of policy.
Politics is tricky, but Americain institutions have brought about major changes to Americain society, even if those changes came about too slowly or too quickly for some.
I'm always saying it - but the compromise is so difficult in US politics because there are really only two parties. Here we have the two majors ones (Liberals and Conservatives), but then we have the NDP (New Democratic Party) that is a little further left than the Liberals, the green party that is gaining some traction, and then Quebec has their own party that takes votes from the major parties. In other words, they all have to work together to get stuff done. At the end of the day not much changes from one party to the other when in power. Also, our leader is just a figurehead of the party, so they can get taken down and replaced almost at a moments notice.
Im Coming Home wrote:GONYK wrote:?s=19
Oh **** off Trump, you don't want to count the votes DATED YESTERDAY just because they didn't get delivered? You **** gutted the USPS thats why they couldn't deliver them the day off, PLUS Pennsylvania isn't even allowed to count the votes til the polls close, so they had to count all these votes in 3~ hours? Nah just take the L Trump.
