3toheadmelo wrote:Michigan’s lawsuit gone too.
Don't know why he's sad. He just got paid for doing nothing...did he expect anything else?
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
3toheadmelo wrote:Michigan’s lawsuit gone too.

j4remi wrote:GONYK wrote:j4remi wrote:My point wasn’t built around any policy whatsoever. It was about democratic electoral strategies costing them votes with people of color; losing congressional seats and losing state legislative seats in a year with a historically unpopular president.
The mistakes I singled out were:
- Failures in outreach to people of color, specifying Latino voters since I watched that closely (also rachel bitcofer co-signed Chuck Rocha on this missed opportunity both before and after the election results started pouring in).
- No ground work, literally. Democrats across the spectrum of policy views were telling the Biden campaign that they needed to put canvassers out in battleground states.
- Refusing to pick a stance on key issues. Key here is I don’t think it much matters which direction he’d have gone on the policy; but by being unclear he allowed bad faith actors to fill in the blank and convince some voters not to break his way.
The idea that no voters for Trump were reachable is patently ridiculous to me, at least from the perspective of a person from a Spanish community that knows some trump voters. Chuck Rocha had a good interview with zerlina maxwell where he explained trump’s success in FL.
“Well we beat trump” isn’t enough when the Supreme Court is stacked and Mitch McConnell has a strong chance to continue deciding what legislation gets voted on. It’s not stopping the state legislatures that moved further right. None of that is policy based; it’s just a continuation of failures that we’ve seen at least throughout my lifetime. Way too many Dems only care about holding the executive branch and it shows throughout the judicial and legislative branch being dominated by conservatives.
I don't disagree on critiques 1 and 2.
On 3, I feel a little "meh" about.
If you judge Trump solely on policy or are open to Trump despite his conduct, I think your moral compass is broken at best and you are a racist at worst. The middle of that is that you are ignorant.
I don't know how much you can appeal to those people without compromising yourself as a candidate. A candidate that looks like he's going to win by 8M+ votes
It's not a policy critique, it's a messaging critique. I don't think Biden's campaign taking a firm stance on those issues would be about appealing to anybody but cutting down on the negative partisanship impact.
The Biden tact was basically "by not committing to court stacking we can avoid angering the Republican voter, but we won't piss off the left independent voters either by leaving the door open a crack."
But I think the result actually allowed both of those groups to assume the worst (aided along by bad faith commentary heavily). Had he picked a side, one of the bad faith angles would be a much harder sell.

robillionaire wrote:mpharris36 wrote:robillionaire wrote:
It's seems pretty likely perdue will be under 50%. But given that he had more votes this time, and trump won't be on the ballot next time the turnout would probably a lot different so I think it would benefit him
Yup and my guess James got hurt by Trump in Michigan too (trump lost by 3pts in MI and James on the same line lost by only 1.5 pts). That libertarian vote might be a deciding factor in GA to not get Perdue in and I think a lot of them rightfully despise trump...so if he's off the ballet I would assume that would help those senate races. But only time will tell.
My instinct on that could also be way off because Trump also drove a high turnout to the polls and if he is defeated they may not get the same enthusiasm either.

SelbyCobra wrote:
j4remi wrote:
Sam and Emma covered my frustrations better than I could possibly type it out and they did it in about 10 minutes to open the show. Skip to 3:25 and give that all of 10 or 15 minutes. This was a missed opportunity. Go back to the last thread and look at the confidence leading up to the election and then look at the results...There was no Comey letter, everyone was aware of Russian interference challenges, pollsters corrected for their missteps with Clinton; the Dems still managed to lose congressional seats, state seats, and enough toss-ups to make this a stressful process instead of a clear rejection of Trumpism.
They need to change their approach to winning elections point blank.
mpharris36 wrote:SelbyCobra wrote:
Nevada basically just said they are taking a long weekend and will get back to us later.

Im Coming Home wrote:mpharris36 wrote:SelbyCobra wrote:
Nevada basically just said they are taking a long weekend and will get back to us later.
Does Nevada always count this slow? Or are they being attention whores because normally no one cares about it?
First they don't announce **** yesterday, make us wait til today, announce barely any votes and they go back to sleep til tomorrow.![]()

KnicksGadfly wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Michigan’s lawsuit gone too.
Don't know why he's sad. He just got paid for doing nothing...did he expect anything else?

Im Coming Home wrote:mpharris36 wrote:SelbyCobra wrote:
Nevada basically just said they are taking a long weekend and will get back to us later.
Does Nevada always count this slow? Or are they being attention whores because normally no one cares about it?
First they don't announce **** yesterday, make us wait til today, announce barely any votes and they go back to sleep til tomorrow.![]()
CharlesOakley wrote:At least the Trump trolls have disappeared from this thread. Who would have guessed?
BallSacBounce wrote:They truly arePolk377 wrote:Profiles in Courgage
BallSacBounce wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:rammagen wrote:here is the thing and maybe I am naive the laws clearly state these votes are valid. The Supreme court would rule in favor of counting the votes not throwing out the votes. That would be dis-enfranchising the voters that voted by mail legally. before trump these poepl upheld the law personal views aside. The laws clearly on the side of counting the votes
It's not going to even reach supreme court territory. Those are baseless claims that will cease and flame out on local or state level, so the result will soon be pretty firm. Biden will be president and the world can take a breather, Republicans can retool and the dems can check how far left they dare to go.
- There won't be any legal aftermath.
- There won't be any socialism in the US. Most of you don't even know what that means.
- There also won't be too much political change and you realize that once you look at how the Senate is filling out. Biden can try, but it's a putt situation.
At least the US will become reasonable and reliable.
It's already reached the Supreme Court.

Handledatruth wrote:Handledatruth wrote:How are people saying PA is a done deal? The math shows that it is close and Philly wont put Biden over the top. I guess if all the mail in ballots lean 70% regardless of origin, then that makes sense but that's not a given. Just wondering if I am missing something besides what has been reported in the totals.
You know what? Did some more math and looks pretty good if margins in PA play out as they are. Basically the remaining set of mail in votes would have to be heavily favored for Trump for that to change. Not impossible for Trump, but Biden's prospects look better.

Clyde_Style wrote:I am done with underestimating how many chitty Americans there are. This country is full of creeps.
Clyde_Style wrote:GONYK wrote:j4remi wrote:
My point wasn’t built around any policy whatsoever. It was about democratic electoral strategies costing them votes with people of color; losing congressional seats and losing state legislative seats in a year with a historically unpopular president.
The mistakes I singled out were:
- Failures in outreach to people of color, specifying Latino voters since I watched that closely (also rachel bitcofer co-signed Chuck Rocha on this missed opportunity both before and after the election results started pouring in).
- No ground work, literally. Democrats across the spectrum of policy views were telling the Biden campaign that they needed to put canvassers out in battleground states.
- Refusing to pick a stance on key issues. Key here is I don’t think it much matters which direction he’d have gone on the policy; but by being unclear he allowed bad faith actors to fill in the blank and convince some voters not to break his way.
The idea that no voters for Trump were reachable is patently ridiculous to me, at least from the perspective of a person from a Spanish community that knows some trump voters. Chuck Rocha had a good interview with zerlina maxwell where he explained trump’s success in FL.
“Well we beat trump” isn’t enough when the Supreme Court is stacked and Mitch McConnell has a strong chance to continue deciding what legislation gets voted on. It’s not stopping the state legislatures that moved further right. None of that is policy based; it’s just a continuation of failures that we’ve seen at least throughout my lifetime. Way too many Dems only care about holding the executive branch and it shows throughout the judicial and legislative branch being dominated by conservatives.
I don't disagree on critiques 1 and 2.
On 3, I feel a little "meh" about.
If you judge Trump solely on policy or are open to Trump despite his conduct, I think your moral compass is broken at best and you are a racist at worst. The middle of that is that you are ignorant.
I don't know how much you can appeal to those people without compromising yourself as a candidate. A candidate that looks like he's going to win by 4M+ votes
I am done with underestimating how many chitty Americans there are. This country is full of creeps.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Pointgod wrote:BallSacBounce wrote:Strick wrote:Hopefully Biden just wins Penn so this whole debacle doesn't have to go any further. Relying almost solely on the results of NV would be beyond stressful
Both are going to be challenged. If it's peace you're after take a nap and set your alarm clock for December... or January.
Based on what legal precedent?