johnnyvann840 wrote:transplant wrote:Given that they lost the turnover battle 2-0, I'm amazed they didn't lose by 20. Given their makeshift offensive line, the defense had to create turnovers and ideally score some points. The D did great against Henry (3.2 yds/carry), but it's not enough when you KNOW the offense is absolutely crippled in the offensive line.
I give the Bears credit. They hung in there all the way. That's a credit to the players and the coaching staff. Overall, they exceeded my expectations today.
What's crazy is that as bad as the offense was, they were still out-gaining Tenn even before the garbage time drive. Really, if we only had a good offensive line, we would be a very good football team. Foles (and even Mitch) would look a lot better with a decent line in front of them. I think Montgomery would be a solid back with some blocking too. It's remarkable that as bad and slow as he looks, he is still averaging around 4 YPC. It's just that our QB never has any time and the running back is always met in the backfield. Very little daylight.
We know it’s the line. Foles is nothing great but we have proof he can be mediocre enough to win. Good offensive lines can make any running back look good, look how Denver in the Elias years could plug any back in or look at Emmit Smiths career.















