Iscull wrote:For us, we have the leverage because Harden only wants to play for a handful of teams. We just need to make a more compelling trade offer than BK.
Houston is not obligated to trade Harden to that handful of teams.
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Foshan, Sixerscan, sixers hoops

Iscull wrote:For us, we have the leverage because Harden only wants to play for a handful of teams. We just need to make a more compelling trade offer than BK.
Stanford wrote:Iscull wrote:For us, we have the leverage because Harden only wants to play for a handful of teams. We just need to make a more compelling trade offer than BK.
Houston is not obligated to trade Harden to that handful of teams.
sixers_simmons wrote:Stanford wrote:Iscull wrote:For us, we have the leverage because Harden only wants to play for a handful of teams. We just need to make a more compelling trade offer than BK.
Houston is not obligated to trade Harden to that handful of teams.
Will the other teams give up assets for Harden when he won’t want to play there long term? Unlikely

sixers_simmons wrote:Will the other teams give up assets for Harden when he won’t want to play there long term?
Stanford wrote:sixers_simmons wrote:Will the other teams give up assets for Harden when he won’t want to play there long term?
Yes. Top five players in their prime change championship odds.
DT RAW wrote:Heres the thing. Even if we got harden without trading ben, which wont happen but if we did...
Ben is going to **** up the offense yet again even with harden. Ben is USELESS off the ball in thr half court and we DAMN sure better not turn harden into a spot up shooter.
So ben and embiid will continue clogging the paint and now hardens driving to the basket and getting to the ft line is all **** up.
Its like we continue doing the same **** over n over exoecting diff results
Yet the results r all the same, every single offensive stud we think we have ends up wayyyyy less effectivw in philly and theres a giant red blinking cone on the court causing it but instead we continue acting like that useless cone ia suddenly going to be kevin durant at any moment on offense
Even with harden on this team, if ben and embiid are both on the court then harden will be WAYYYYYYY less effective of a player. FACT
Trade bens ass. Im sick of ground hog day every **** year
DT RAW wrote:Heres the thing. Even if we got harden without trading ben, which wont happen but if we did...
Ben is going to **** up the offense yet again even with harden. Ben is USELESS off the ball in thr half court and we DAMN sure better not turn harden into a spot up shooter.
So ben and embiid will continue clogging the paint and now hardens driving to the basket and getting to the ft line is all **** up.
Its like we continue doing the same **** over n over exoecting diff results
Yet the results r all the same, every single offensive stud we think we have ends up wayyyyy less effectivw in philly and theres a giant red blinking cone on the court causing it but instead we continue acting like that useless cone ia suddenly going to be kevin durant at any moment on offense
Even with harden on this team, if ben and embiid are both on the court then harden will be WAYYYYYYY less effective of a player. FACT
Trade bens ass. Im sick of ground hog day every **** year
Arsenal wrote:Stanford wrote:sixers_simmons wrote:Will the other teams give up assets for Harden when he won’t want to play there long term?
Yes. Top five players in their prime change championship odds.
Again, Toronto didn't give up much for Kawhi. They gave up a net negative in DeRozan who Masai didn't want to keep, plus a mediocre C prospect and a 1st round pick. Hell, Toronto got back a significantly net positive role player also in Danny Green!
Not exactly the King's Ransom people are claiming it will take to get Harden.

Arsenal wrote:Stanford wrote:sixers_simmons wrote:Will the other teams give up assets for Harden when he won’t want to play there long term?
Yes. Top five players in their prime change championship odds.
Again, Toronto didn't give up much for Kawhi. They gave up a net negative in DeRozan who Masai didn't want to keep, plus a mediocre C prospect and a 1st round pick. Hell, Toronto got back a significantly net positive role player also in Danny Green!
Not exactly the King's Ransom people are claiming it will take to get Harden.

Arsenal wrote:Stanford wrote:sixers_simmons wrote:Will the other teams give up assets for Harden when he won’t want to play there long term?
Yes. Top five players in their prime change championship odds.
Again, Toronto didn't give up much for Kawhi. They gave up a net negative in DeRozan who Masai didn't want to keep, plus a mediocre C prospect and a 1st round pick. Hell, Toronto got back a significantly net positive role player also in Danny Green!
Not exactly the King's Ransom people are claiming it will take to get Harden.
Mik317 wrote:DT RAW wrote:Heres the thing. Even if we got harden without trading ben, which wont happen but if we did...
Ben is going to **** up the offense yet again even with harden. Ben is USELESS off the ball in thr half court and we DAMN sure better not turn harden into a spot up shooter.
So ben and embiid will continue clogging the paint and now hardens driving to the basket and getting to the ft line is all **** up.
Its like we continue doing the same **** over n over exoecting diff results
Yet the results r all the same, every single offensive stud we think we have ends up wayyyyy less effectivw in philly and theres a giant red blinking cone on the court causing it but instead we continue acting like that useless cone ia suddenly going to be kevin durant at any moment on offense
Even with harden on this team, if ben and embiid are both on the court then harden will be WAYYYYYYY less effective of a player. FACT
Trade bens ass. Im sick of ground hog day every **** year
You lack a creative mind.
Ben and Embiid has never played with a shot creator their entire time here. That was supposed to be Fultz. Harden also can play off ball some and you can stagger minutes and have Ben run the second unit.
again your hatred of Ben clouds any point you make. You are no better than his stans in this regard.
and guess what if it doesn't work out...we can trade Ben to ADD to Harden and Embiid. In what world is that a bad thing lol

Stanford wrote:Arsenal wrote:Stanford wrote:
Yes. Top five players in their prime change championship odds.
Again, Toronto didn't give up much for Kawhi. They gave up a net negative in DeRozan who Masai didn't want to keep, plus a mediocre C prospect and a 1st round pick. Hell, Toronto got back a significantly net positive role player also in Danny Green!
Not exactly the King's Ransom people are claiming it will take to get Harden.
Kawhi had one year left and people were genuinely confused about his injury status. The difference between one year and two is huge. If it doesn't work in the first year and it's clear the player won't resign, you can still trade the player (still top 5) the next year and recoup some of your assets. As Sam Presti has shown, pressure to succeed in other organizations can be used as leverage to get returns for star players. Every year there are GM that are forced to make bad deals to satisfy ownership/star players. You could absolutely trade Harden next offseason, probably for a lot.

