TD75 wrote:Let's be honest here. The Bucks did not give all those picks just for a practically expiring contract in Jrue.
The Bucks gave all those picks in order to:
- Get rid of Bledsoe, who is an absolute nightmare next to Giannis (not just Bledsoe's fault, but it is irrelevant now).
- Get rid of Hill, who even though has been a big positive for the Bucks, his performance in the last playoffs has been quite bad. He is also at an age where you really have to worry about massive drops in performance/non sustainable performance.
- Add Jrue, who is a more versatile defender (and arguably a better defender) than Bledsoe, and can actually shoot. So, he is playable next to Giannis, will not fill the lanes with his presence and (most importantly for me) is a much better decision maker than Bledsoe.
Did the Bucks overpay? Absolutely.
Are the Pelicans laughing at the haul they got from the Bucks? Absolutely. I bet they can't believe it.
Did the Bucks have another option, considering the horrible choices their FOs made all those years? Absolutely not.
Every bad choice the FO made has a side effect even years later.
I have no idea how the Bucks are going to renew their roster 3 years from now and compete, even assuming Giannis stays.
I hope Jrue renews as well. The alternative would be horrible for the Bucks.
Also, us acquiring Jrue meant Boston and Philly didn't. Which is huge for me.
























