dilbert719 wrote:What was that people were saying about Horford costing 2-3 firsts to move?
RGM consistently over-values how much it would take to move bad deals tbh
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

dilbert719 wrote:What was that people were saying about Horford costing 2-3 firsts to move?

Could've just resigned JJ and you're in a similar spot but without losing a pick. Brand really did a number on Philly right after Colangelo stripped the team of assets.BullyKing wrote:I guess the trade is fine but I just can't get over how much damage Elton Brand managed to do in a single year.
Phobo_Phile wrote:psman2 wrote:Phobo_Phile wrote:Why do I get the feeling that Horford is going to have a monster year and then somehow through Presti magic he's able to flip Horford again for more picks in a year or two?
It would be the 1st monster season he has ever had. Don't get me wrong he has been a good player for a long time, but he was never a huge stat guy ever. A monster season is what 13/7 from him now.
I am now a firm believer in Presti's voodoo and the spell he is able to cast upon the other 29 front offices.
clippertown wrote:Good for OKC to pick up more assets but the team will be brutal to watch next season. The team seems mismatched with almost zero offense. SGA is gonna have a tough season without CP3. Hopefully in a few years OKC can become relevant again but many of their picks rely on other teams to crash and burn or those many picks will all be very late in the draft.
HartfordWhalers wrote:Small scale, but giving #34 versus #36 could be annoying.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
dilbert719 wrote:What was that people were saying about Horford costing 2-3 firsts to move?

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:clippertown wrote:Good for OKC to pick up more assets but the team will be brutal to watch next season. The team seems mismatched with almost zero offense. SGA is gonna have a tough season without CP3. Hopefully in a few years OKC can become relevant again but many of their picks rely on other teams to crash and burn or those many picks will all be very late in the draft.
They are nowhere near done. The chances of all of the picks (including OKC’s own) being late is very low. It’s a numbers game.
loserX wrote:Salary impact:
Philly saves/OKC takes on:
20/21: $12,134,146
21/22: $27,000,000
22/23: $26,500,000 or can cut him for $14,500,000 dead money
That is a LOT. Horford is still productive but I have this as a clear win for Philly.

gswhoops wrote:dilbert719 wrote:What was that people were saying about Horford costing 2-3 firsts to move?
RGM consistently over-values how much it would take to move bad deals tbh
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:gswhoops wrote:dilbert719 wrote:What was that people were saying about Horford costing 2-3 firsts to move?
RGM consistently over-values how much it would take to move bad deals tbh
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This feels like an interested post

mglviks1 wrote:OKC presti just kills it everytime. Stop trading with him.

kb02 wrote:Good deal for Philly. Don't get the celebration regarding the 1st in 2025. My bet, OKC prefers a 2025 first rather than a sooner first. Why? Philly will likely be out of its window by then.
Having a good laugh over folks saying it's a clear win that Horford would only take one 1st to punt. When people were assuming Horford plus Zhaire plus 24 was enough for Buddy. Buddy > Green. Levels above.

jayjaysee wrote:clippertown wrote:Good for OKC to pick up more assets but the team will be brutal to watch next season. The team seems mismatched with almost zero offense. SGA is gonna have a tough season without CP3. Hopefully in a few years OKC can become relevant again but many of their picks rely on other teams to crash and burn or those many picks will all be very late in the draft.
We said that last year. All Presti has to do is pay Gallo and they can be just as good as last year..
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Couch Potato wrote:Looks like i'm eating some crow. I thought it take a larger haul to dump Horford. Didn't expect the Thunder to take him though. But Thunder have way to many picks down the line. Have to move up or move down or out some drafts. War chest over flowing. They went gentle with 76ers. Still top 6 protect in 2025? Who knows what 76ers look like then. But yeah I was wrong. Horford playing PF or off the bench? Gallinari walking now? Thunder still have Adams as a expiring deal.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:GutUNC wrote:psman2 wrote:
If that was true then Presti would have made that trade. I got Ferguson as a negative contract that no team would give even cap space for. Green too was not fetching a 1st without long term bad money coming to OKC which is what just happened.
Ferguson is a 40% 3PT shooter on a rookie contract for another year or two. How is that a negative contract? He's not a world beater or anything but...
He shoots 40 from the floor. 29% from 3 last year, 34 ish on the career. He’s an insane leaper, some decent skills. Was working hard on the corner 3. But very much a project still.
Return to Trades and Transactions