[Woj] Jazz trade Bradley/#38 to Detroit

Post #1 » by **loserX** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:38 am

Read on Twitter

What is "future considerations"? That's not a thing.

Post #2 » by **Texas Chuck** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:39 am

Why Bradley and not Davis? And is Detroit playing Blake and rookies next year?

Post #3 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:41 am

loserX wrote:What is "future considerations"? That's not a thing.

“Please consider this valid”

Like this for Detroit. They are going to come away with a lot of rookies to be excited about.

Post #4 » by **loserX** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:41 am

"Too"? Maybe this is a top-55 protected nothing?

Read on Twitter

Post #5 » by **VCfor3** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:41 am

I'm with Chuck. Dumping Bradley seems weird when there was a more obvious candidate.

Post #6 » by **HartfordWhalers** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:41 am

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
loserX wrote:What is "future considerations"? That's not a thing.

“Please consider this valid”

Read on Twitter

Phobo_Phile · Post #7 » by **Phobo_Phile** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:45 am

God it's so nice to finally have a GM that's aggressive towards rebuilding. F*ckin' FINALLY.

HornetJail · Post #8 » by **HornetJail** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:47 am

It really annoys me that Charlotte isn't pouncing on salary dumps like this

Scoot McGroot · Post #9 » by **Scoot McGroot** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:48 am

KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:It really annoys me that Charlotte isn't pouncing on salary dumps like this

How about a nice 54 for a shiny TJ Leaf????? No? I should see myself out???

I’ll see myself out.

jbk1234 · Post #10 » by **jbk1234** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:48 am

loserX wrote:

Read on Twitter

What is "future considerations"? That's not a thing.

It's what you promise your wife if she'll take out the garbage this time.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app

jbk1234 · Post #11 » by **jbk1234** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:50 am

VCfor3 wrote:I'm with Chuck. Dumping Bradley seems weird when there was a more obvious candidate.

The Pistons passed?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J327A using RealGM mobile app

The Moose · Post #12 » by **The Moose** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 3:51 am

Texas Chuck wrote:Why Bradley and not Davis? And is Detroit playing Blake and rookies next year?

I have to imagine we are trying to unload Blake and Rose

DerrickNoah · Post #13 » by **DerrickNoah** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 4:07 am

This is good for Tony Bradley, especially since Utah just drafted Azubuike

eminence · Post #14 » by **eminence** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 4:13 am

Utah not doing great this draft. I can see the case for Ed over Tony, happier being a third stringer and whatnot, but oof.

chrbal · Post #15 » by **chrbal** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 4:19 am

Texas Chuck wrote:Why Bradley and not Davis? And is Detroit playing Blake and rookies next year?

I honestly don’t understand Utah’s logic. But I think this is awesome for my pistons. I thought about posting a 38/Davis to Detroit for practically nothing type trade, but opted not to.

Blake is going to see a lot of “load management” this season unless we can deal him.

What type of player is Bradley?

Post #16 » by **loserX** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 4:28 am

chrbal wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:Why Bradley and not Davis? And is Detroit playing Blake and rookies next year?

I honestly don’t understand Utah’s logic. But I think this is awesome for my pistons. I thought about posting a 38/Davis to Detroit for practically nothing type trade, but opted not to.

Blake is going to see a lot of “load management” this season unless we can deal him.

What type of player is Bradley?

Good IQ, decent passer for a big, not athletic at all. Bench guy, but given where Detroit is, well worth a look to see what you can get out of him.

Nice trade for Detroit. Obviously Utah really was worried about the tax, but if this is the price for keeping Clarkson I don't blame them either.

Snakebites · Post #17 » by **Snakebites** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 4:35 am

The Moose wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:Why Bradley and not Davis? And is Detroit playing Blake and rookies next year?

I have to imagine we are trying to unload Blake and Rose

I'm minorly surprised Rose wasn't moved for a second rounder today.

I still seriously doubt we can move Blake. Maybe if he gets off the a great start this year...no, still no.

We'd have to add pick(s) to unload him and clearly Weaver's about adding picks, not losing them.

babyjax13 · Post #18 » by **babyjax13** » Thu Nov 19, 2020 4:43 am

I do not mind it. Bradley can be replaced for the minimum. He is a nice young player, though, so I don't mind it for Detroit. I assume we also stretch Davis (hence why not him - we are doing both). This gets us to where we can use the full MLE and resign Clarkson to say $10 million per year, and lord knows a full MLE player will be better than Bradley.