11/20 FREE AGENCY begins at 3:00 PDT

clyde21 · Post #181 » by **clyde21** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 7:13 am

we should make a play for E'Twaun Moore with the DPE

Post #182 » by **Hopper15** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 7:15 am

InWestWeTrust wrote:I seriously doubt we trade for a player with the DPE

What's the rules on that? Only a 1 yr rental no matter what?

Yes. Expiring contracts only with no options.

InWestWeTrust · Post #183 » by **InWestWeTrust** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 7:16 am

Hopper15 wrote:
InWestWeTrust wrote:I seriously doubt we trade for a player with the DPE

What's the rules on that? Only a 1 yr rental no matter what?

Yes. Expiring contracts only with no options.

Right on, thanks.

I like the sound of your McDermott scenario. We need the shooting

migya · Post #184 » by **migya** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 7:25 am

Avery Bradley and Austin Rivers are the best fits and they are experienced. If Bradley can be lured for just vet minimum and Rivers for MLE that'd be a coup.

Coxy · Post #185 » by **Coxy** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 7:52 am

No to Rivers, no to Lin.

Kuya · Post #186 » by **Kuya** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:04 am

Warriors sign Marc Gasol, Pau Gasol and trade for Rubio

Team Spainnnn

killmongrel · Post #187 » by **killmongrel** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:06 am

Warriors are not going to spend anything more than vet minimums from here on out. The Oubre deal was basically their big move and anything else would be overkill especially if they use their other assets for a 1 year rental.

Coxy · Post #188 » by **Coxy** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:31 am

killmongrel wrote:Warriors are not going to spend anything more than vet minimums from here on out. The Oubre deal was basically their big move and anything else would be overkill especially if they use their other assets for a 1 year rental.

killjoymongrel

WarriorGM · Post #189 » by **WarriorGM** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:35 am

Was Oubre really the best the front office could do? I'm not super enthused.

Coxy wrote:No to Rivers, no to Lin.

Why not? Aside from leftover Clippers antipathy I don't get the no to Rivers. He's at a prime age. Lin may be done but I don't know if we really know. Unless one of the up and comers is superior, having Lin would still be a plus.

killmongrel · Post #190 » by **killmongrel** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 9:04 am

Coxy wrote:
killmongrel wrote:Warriors are not going to spend anything more than vet minimums from here on out. The Oubre deal was basically their big move and anything else would be overkill especially if they use their other assets for a 1 year rental.

killjoymongrel

I'm just being realistic. Also, I don't think it's a bad thing since the Warriors can save those assets later in the season to see what team they have so far. If the Warriors use those other exceptions, they would have to be for players that are amazing. Honestly, I think they can get some good options at the vet. minimum.

Coxy · Post #191 » by **Coxy** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 9:04 am

WarriorGM wrote:Was Oubre really the best the front office could do? I'm not super enthused.

Coxy wrote:No to Rivers, no to Lin.

Why not? Aside from leftover Clippers antipathy I don't get the no to Rivers. He's at a prime age. Lin may be done but I don't know if we really know. Unless one of the up and comers is superior, having Lin would still be a plus.

Not a fan of either.

superunknown · Post #192 » by **superunknown** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 9:40 am

I'd stay far away from bustin rivers and lin.

ChuckDurn · Post #193 » by **ChuckDurn** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 1:55 pm

My current pipe dream:
1. Warriors convince Ibaka to sign for the DPE (~$9.3M)
2. Execute a trade (likely involving a third team) to acquire Huerter from Atlanta. (It looks like Atlanta is going to end up with Bogdanovic at the 2, and they also love Reddish at 2/3, so Huerter may be considered more dispensable.) Huerter’s salary JUST fits into the remaining amount of the TPD, with only $100-200k to spare. Paschall or Poole would be the main outgoing asset from Warriors, including 2nd rounders and potentially Looney and/or Lee.)
3. Divide the MLE between GR3 and DJ Augustin
(4. Likely trade Looney for some luxury tax relief. Might have to attach a 2nd round pick to get somebody to take him.)

4 starters would have positional versatility: Wiggins (2/3), Oubre (3/4), Draymond (4/5), Ibaka (5/4). So while we might be without a true back-up PF if we have to trade Paschall, those minutes would be filled by either Ibaka (playing next to Wiseman or Chriss at the 5) or Oubre (playing small-ball 4).

For sake of the line-up, I’m assuming they have to include Paschall AND Poole in the Huerter deal, and Looney’s gone as well, but here’s what it would look like:

PG: Curry / Augustin
SG: Wiggins / Huerter / Lee
SF: Oubre / GR3
PF: Draymond / (Ibaka / Oubre)
C: Ibaka / Wiseman / Chriss / Smailagic

That top-9 is formidable. It addresses the problems of “lack of shooting” at the wings with Huerter and GR3; has a good, proven back-up PG in Augustin; puts a guy who is a stretch 5 in the starting line-up (so Draymond is the only shooting liability); and offers a huge variety of different types of line-up, big or small.

Onus · Post #194 » by **Onus** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 2:43 pm

From what’s left kcp and gr3

michaelwarner · Post #195 » by **michaelwarner** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 3:53 pm

Read on Twitter

?s=21

michaelwarner · Post #196 » by **michaelwarner** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 3:54 pm

Read on Twitter

?s=21

superunknown · Post #197 » by **superunknown** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 3:59 pm

crowder will prolly gonna go somewhere else to get a multi-year deal.

Post #198 » by **Hopper15** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 4:09 pm

Miami signing Harkless suggests they are moving on from Crowder. So JC may be in play now. I thought he would get a Dragic / Leonard type deal.

Warriorfan · Post #199 » by **Warriorfan** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 4:13 pm

DPE will be probably held if we need a buy out player for a playoff push.

I think it will me Vet Mins from here.

michaelwarner · Post #200 » by **michaelwarner** » Sat Nov 21, 2020 4:23 pm

Read on Twitter

?s=21