Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow
Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- Jake0890
- Forum Mod - Pacers
- Posts: 5,983
- And1: 807
- Joined: Jul 12, 2012
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
GREAT value for the Pacers. We need his production back and there's no way we could've replaced him at this price.
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
-
- Forum Mod - Pacers
- Posts: 5,814
- And1: 400
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: Buffalo, NY
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Love the deal. Nice bargain for the Pacers.
The first rule of Basketball: Believe.
Follow on twitter @Grang33r
Follow on twitter @Grang33r
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- Jake0890
- Forum Mod - Pacers
- Posts: 5,983
- And1: 807
- Joined: Jul 12, 2012
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Also, this is significant:
Means we could potentially add another player in free agency.
Means we could potentially add another player in free agency.
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,728
- And1: 1,883
- Joined: Nov 18, 2017
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Very nice, welcome back Justin
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,204
- And1: 1,532
- Joined: Jul 07, 2003
- Location: Indy
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Seeing the contracts being doled out 6 per is excellent value. 3&D achieved.
"A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears." -Michel de Montaigne
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- OnFire
- Junior
- Posts: 313
- And1: 27
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
First great news of the signing season.
Hopefully, there's more coming.
Hopefully, there's more coming.
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,764
- And1: 11,059
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Love this deal. Love it love it.
And, as pointed out, this is the largest deal he could get with his non bird rights (20% raise from current salary with 5% raises yearly), so the MLE is untouched (if we ever get low enough under the tax to use it).
And, as pointed out, this is the largest deal he could get with his non bird rights (20% raise from current salary with 5% raises yearly), so the MLE is untouched (if we ever get low enough under the tax to use it).
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,764
- And1: 11,059
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Ah. Indy writers are reporting 3/18.8, which would mean its carved out of the MLE. 3/18.02 is about the highest we could offer using his non bird rights and retain the full MLE.
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- Wizop
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,881
- And1: 4,068
- Joined: Jun 15, 2003
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
- Contact:
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,764
- And1: 11,059
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
The Indy reporters are saying $18.8m, which would put it above the non bird rights and into the MLE. We’ll find out in a couple days for sure, but something to keep in mind.
Bold play would be if we fit it into His non bird rights, and keep the MLE open and tell Hayward, “Danny won’t deal with us. If you want to be here, you gotta take the MLE.” ABSOLUTELY UNREALISTIC! But bold!
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- Wizop
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,881
- And1: 4,068
- Joined: Jun 15, 2003
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
- Contact:
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
I can see us staying at 13 and giving Stanley a two way. Alize also eligible for a two way. Hammonds goes to Ants.Scoot McGroot wrote:
The Indy reporters are saying $18.8m, which would put it above the non bird rights and into the MLE. We’ll find out in a couple days for sure, but something to keep in mind.
Bold play would be if we fit it into His non bird rights, and keep the MLE open and tell Hayward, “Danny won’t deal with us. If you want to be here, you gotta take the MLE.” ABSOLUTELY UNREALISTIC! But bold!
This assuming no cost cutting in Hayward deal. I'd prefer trading Vic to Turner for lots of reasons including higher salary.
Sent from my phone.
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,764
- And1: 11,059
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Wizop wrote:I can see us staying at 13 and giving Stanley a two way. Alize also eligible for a two way. Hammonds goes to Ants.Scoot McGroot wrote:
The Indy reporters are saying $18.8m, which would put it above the non bird rights and into the MLE. We’ll find out in a couple days for sure, but something to keep in mind.
Bold play would be if we fit it into His non bird rights, and keep the MLE open and tell Hayward, “Danny won’t deal with us. If you want to be here, you gotta take the MLE.” ABSOLUTELY UNREALISTIC! But bold!
This assuming no cost cutting in Hayward deal. I'd prefer trading Vic to Turner for lots of reasons including higher salary.
Sent from my phone.
14 is the minimum. You can dip down to 13 for no more than 2 weeks at a time in season, and have to start the season with 14. You can go down to 13 with trades.
If Alize is to take a demotion to a 2 way, it would be history if he did it with the Pacers. No player ever has gone from an NBA contract to a 2 way with the same team. It would clearly show you’re not in the teams plans long term.
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,728
- And1: 1,883
- Joined: Nov 18, 2017
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Scoot McGroot wrote:
The Indy reporters are saying $18.8m, which would put it above the non bird rights and into the MLE. We’ll find out in a couple days for sure, but something to keep in mind.
Bold play would be if we fit it into His non bird rights, and keep the MLE open and tell Hayward, “Danny won’t deal with us. If you want to be here, you gotta take the MLE.” ABSOLUTELY UNREALISTIC! But bold!
Bold. I love it
Reportedly, his wife has been bugging him about relocating back to Indiana
Come on Gordie, happy wife = happy life!
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,764
- And1: 11,059
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Topofthekey wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:
The Indy reporters are saying $18.8m, which would put it above the non bird rights and into the MLE. We’ll find out in a couple days for sure, but something to keep in mind.
Bold play would be if we fit it into His non bird rights, and keep the MLE open and tell Hayward, “Danny won’t deal with us. If you want to be here, you gotta take the MLE.” ABSOLUTELY UNREALISTIC! But bold!
Bold. I love it
Reportedly, his wife has been bugging him about relocating back to Indiana
Come on Gordie, happy wife = happy life!
Wife would also have to be happy with having given up $25m too
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- Wizop
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,881
- And1: 4,068
- Joined: Jun 15, 2003
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
- Contact:
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Then we're not done dealing.Scoot McGroot wrote:14 is the minimum.
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,764
- And1: 11,059
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Wizop wrote:Then we're not done dealing.Scoot McGroot wrote:Wizop wrote:I can see us staying at 13 and giving Stanley a two way. Alize also eligible for a two way. Hammonds goes to Ants.
This assuming no cost cutting in Hayward deal. I'd prefer trading Vic to Turner for lots of reasons including higher salary.
Sent from my phone.
14 is the minimum. You can dip down to 13 for no more than 2 weeks at a time in season, and have to start the season with 14. You can go down to 13 with trades.
If Alize is to take a demotion to a 2 way, it would be history if he did it with the Pacers. No player ever has gone from an NBA contract to a 2 way with the same team. It would clearly show you’re not in the teams plans long term.
Sent from my phone.
Correct. Assume we’re in a holding pattern until something happens with Hayward, but we have to have other moves.
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,728
- And1: 1,883
- Joined: Nov 18, 2017
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Realistically though, I don't see how Celtics have any leverage in this, at all
If it's about money, I'm sure one of those cap space teams (Hornets? Pistons?) would be willing to give him 4 years/$100m
If it's about his preference on where to play, he obviously wants out from Celtics, and prefers to play with the Pacers
The Celtics' only role is to facilitate a S&T to the Pacers, and common sense dictates that they would want to do that as well, as the alternative means they lose Hayward for nothing
If it's about money, I'm sure one of those cap space teams (Hornets? Pistons?) would be willing to give him 4 years/$100m
If it's about his preference on where to play, he obviously wants out from Celtics, and prefers to play with the Pacers
The Celtics' only role is to facilitate a S&T to the Pacers, and common sense dictates that they would want to do that as well, as the alternative means they lose Hayward for nothing
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,764
- And1: 11,059
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Topofthekey wrote:Realistically though, I don't see how Celtics have any leverage in this, at all
If it's about money, I'm sure one of those cap space teams (Hornets? Pistons?) would be willing to give him 4 years/$100m
If it's about his preference on where to play, he obviously wants out from Celtics, and prefers to play with the Pacers
The Celtics' only role is to facilitate a S&T to the Pacers, and common sense dictates that they would want to do that as well, as the alternative means they lose Hayward for nothing
Pistons are all out of space. Hawks have cap space, but no roster role. Knicks have cap space and roster role. But they’re about it. Charlotte has space, but I don’t think they have $25m. Okc could have space after making all their moves if they renounce their TPE’s, but they’re just in value acquisition mode, not quite talent acquisition. And they won’t possibly renounce those for awhile and after the market is essentially over.
Boston has leverage with teams like us and Dallas, since we absolutely cannot acquire him this offseason without them playing along. Let’s be honest about that. And they have team needs in terms of roster space and fits themselves.
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,728
- And1: 1,883
- Joined: Nov 18, 2017
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Scoot McGroot wrote:Topofthekey wrote:Realistically though, I don't see how Celtics have any leverage in this, at all
If it's about money, I'm sure one of those cap space teams (Hornets? Pistons?) would be willing to give him 4 years/$100m
If it's about his preference on where to play, he obviously wants out from Celtics, and prefers to play with the Pacers
The Celtics' only role is to facilitate a S&T to the Pacers, and common sense dictates that they would want to do that as well, as the alternative means they lose Hayward for nothing
Pistons are all out of space. Hawks have cap space, but no roster role. Knicks have cap space and roster role. But they’re about it. Charlotte has space, but I don’t think they have $25m. Okc could have space after making all their moves if they renounce their TPE’s, but they’re just in value acquisition mode, not quite talent acquisition. And they won’t possibly renounce those for awhile and after the market is essentially over.
Boston has leverage with teams like us and Dallas, since we absolutely cannot acquire him this offseason without them playing along. Let’s be honest about that. And they have team needs in terms of roster space and fits themselves.
The thing is, Hayward to us is like a treat
It'll be nice if we can add him cheaply
But he's not our bread and butter
We are absolutely fine moving on without him
In fact, as has been discussed, taking him on while Warren is still on the team actually represents a problem, instead of a solution
If he wanted to go to Indiana, the negotiations should have been between him and the Celtics
The fact that he has opted out, before a deal is in place, is on him - I don't want us to be the one cleaning up his mess
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
- Scoot McGroot
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 41,764
- And1: 11,059
- Joined: Feb 16, 2005
Re: Pacers Re-Sign Justin Holiday - 3 years, $18.1M
Topofthekey wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:Topofthekey wrote:Realistically though, I don't see how Celtics have any leverage in this, at all
If it's about money, I'm sure one of those cap space teams (Hornets? Pistons?) would be willing to give him 4 years/$100m
If it's about his preference on where to play, he obviously wants out from Celtics, and prefers to play with the Pacers
The Celtics' only role is to facilitate a S&T to the Pacers, and common sense dictates that they would want to do that as well, as the alternative means they lose Hayward for nothing
Pistons are all out of space. Hawks have cap space, but no roster role. Knicks have cap space and roster role. But they’re about it. Charlotte has space, but I don’t think they have $25m. Okc could have space after making all their moves if they renounce their TPE’s, but they’re just in value acquisition mode, not quite talent acquisition. And they won’t possibly renounce those for awhile and after the market is essentially over.
Boston has leverage with teams like us and Dallas, since we absolutely cannot acquire him this offseason without them playing along. Let’s be honest about that. And they have team needs in terms of roster space and fits themselves.
The thing is, Hayward to us is like a treat
It'll be nice if we can add him cheaply
But he's not our bread and butter
We are absolutely fine moving on without him
In fact, as has been discussed, taking him on while Warren is still on the team actually represents a problem, instead of a solution
If he wanted to go to Indiana, the negotiations should have been between him and the Celtics
The fact that he has opted out, before a deal is in place, is on him - I don't want us to be the one cleaning up his mess
You and I may view him as a treat, but we don’t know what Simon and Pritchard feel, and it’s only them that matter. Clearly we want him. We’re working on him. How much? To be determined by us and Danny Ainge.