Kemba For Three wrote:
Almost hope Terry ends up on a team with more spunk. He has too much edge to be on the Hornets.
but LOL LOL LOL Terry can't escape the great white man in Boston.
God anyone but Terry. Such an overrated bum
Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Froob, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman
Kemba For Three wrote:
Almost hope Terry ends up on a team with more spunk. He has too much edge to be on the Hornets.
but LOL LOL LOL Terry can't escape the great white man in Boston.
The Corey's wrote:SMTBSI wrote:The Corey's wrote:
Is that the same game where he tried to have a slam dunk in bams face?
Sorry man. The celtics being close was actually a anomaly to the series and not the given.
That's not how sports work. There aren't fake wins and fake shots and fake plays.
Miami was the better team. But them running us off the court is revisionist history.
You can't alter reality just by repeating things long and loud enough.
Yes. And the reality is that the celtics were outclassed and outplayed by a inferior team that started it's rebuild years after we did
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:The Corey's wrote:SMTBSI wrote:You mean the series where if Tatum hits that buzzer beater in game one, we probably lead the series 3-2?
Miami won. Credit to them. They were better.
But the "it wasn't even close" take is so, so lazy.
Is that the same game where he tried to have a slam dunk in bams face?
Sorry man. The celtics being close was actually a anomaly to the series and not the given.
Are you ok? Like seriously?
We had double digit leads and 4th quarter leads in pretty much every game of that series. Aggregate score was tied..that series was extremely close and was actually 2-2 after gimpy Hayward came on board..
Miami is better than us without Hayward, sure.. but it's very close.
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:The Corey's wrote:SMTBSI wrote:You mean the series where if Tatum hits that buzzer beater in game one, we probably lead the series 3-2?
Miami won. Credit to them. They were better.
But the "it wasn't even close" take is so, so lazy.
Is that the same game where he tried to have a slam dunk in bams face?
Sorry man. The celtics being close was actually a anomaly to the series and not the given.
Are you ok? Like seriously?
We had double digit leads and 4th quarter leads in pretty much every game of that series. Aggregate score was tied..that series was extremely close and was actually 2-2 after gimpy Hayward came on board..
Miami is better than us without Hayward, sure.. but it's very close.
SMTBSI wrote:The Corey's wrote:SMTBSI wrote:That's not how sports work. There aren't fake wins and fake shots and fake plays.
Miami was the better team. But them running us off the court is revisionist history.
You can't alter reality just by repeating things long and loud enough.
Yes. And the reality is that the celtics were outclassed and outplayed by a inferior team that started it's rebuild years after we did
Not outclassed. Yes outplayed. Miami was obviously not inferior.
Are we going to sit here and go "no u" forever?
chrisab123 wrote:BRUNiNHO91 wrote:The Corey's wrote:
Is that the same game where he tried to have a slam dunk in bams face?
Sorry man. The celtics being close was actually a anomaly to the series and not the given.
Are you ok? Like seriously?
We had double digit leads and 4th quarter leads in pretty much every game of that series. Aggregate score was tied..that series was extremely close and was actually 2-2 after gimpy Hayward came on board..
Miami is better than us without Hayward, sure.. but it's very close.
How is it close when Miami smacked this team around without Hayward? Hell...with him too.
AgentGreen wrote:Main target should be Ibaka now. It's very quiet suddenly. Ainge's backup options probably signed their deals already.
bucknersrevenge wrote:I'm gonna say the same thing in here that I said to someone else. I think that some of you are misreading the order of operations involved in a sign and trade. The "sign" comes first. A player has 48 hrs AFTER signing a new deal with his current team to figure out the parameters of salary matching. Check CBA rules. It's in there. They give you the 48 hr window to coordinate the trade with the new team for a reason. And the reason is, THE SIGNING COMES FIRST. Thus, if Hayward doesn't sign the new deal with Boston as proxy to the Pacers' FRO parameters, Danny and the Pacers FO really can't begin in earnest figuring out which players to agree on. Danny didn't get greedy or blow this. What's far more likely is that Hayward's agent explicitly TOLD Hayward not to sign ANYTHING until he did his job and his due diligence around the league. He shook the trees like a good agent and came back with Jordan's offer and then Hayward changed his mind when he saw it. This never really rose to the point where Danny could negotiate and blow anything.
The Corey's wrote:BRUNiNHO91 wrote:The Corey's wrote:
Is that the same game where he tried to have a slam dunk in bams face?
Sorry man. The celtics being close was actually a anomaly to the series and not the given.
Are you ok? Like seriously?
We had double digit leads and 4th quarter leads in pretty much every game of that series. Aggregate score was tied..that series was extremely close and was actually 2-2 after gimpy Hayward came on board..
Miami is better than us without Hayward, sure.. but it's very close.
Agree to disagree.
I bet my signature we don't get out of the second round. Take it or leave boys.
I'd be willing to negotiate even the first round of we parlay it with wins.
The Corey's wrote:SMTBSI wrote:The Corey's wrote:
Yes. And the reality is that the celtics were outclassed and outplayed by a inferior team that started it's rebuild years after we did
Not outclassed. Yes outplayed. Miami was obviously not inferior.
Are we going to sit here and go "no u" forever?
Whole thing ends when we all stop pretending like losing hayward for nothing is fine.
Which I will not waiver on.
MrGreenRunsDeep wrote:So how the F we get Turner?