Knox wrote:Oscirus wrote:
Why isnt korver signed yet? Isnt he supposed to be the ****?
Austin rivers isn’t franchise changing but I would of preferred him over elfrid
Austin Rivers isn’t a playmaker so you really can’t compare the two.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Knox wrote:Oscirus wrote:
Why isnt korver signed yet? Isnt he supposed to be the ****?
Austin rivers isn’t franchise changing but I would of preferred him over elfrid

Chanel Bomber wrote:Great, another forward. This is really what we need after drafting Knox (a bust to be fair), RJ and Obi in the first round.
Meanwhile our backcourt still looks like the Sahara desert.
30andoverclub wrote:Toronto is desperate for front court help and will be even moreso if Gasol leaves. They also have Stanley Johnson making $3.8M to McGee's $4.2M. Johnson played in only 25 games for Toronto last year and further averaged a mere 6.0 minutes in those games.
Trade from Lakers into cap space for second round pick(s). Then trade to Toronto for another second round pick(s).
whocares1 wrote:Knox wrote:Oscirus wrote:Why isnt korver signed yet? Isnt he supposed to be the ****?
Austin rivers isn’t franchise changing but I would of preferred him over elfrid
Austin Rivers isn’t a playmaker so you really can’t compare the two.
HarthorneWingo wrote:Wow, so we're really running with the youth this year. Sounds good to me.

Juggynaut wrote:THE PLAN HAS ALWAYS BEEN TEAM TANK. TRUST IN LEON
god shammgod wrote:i figured it out. kuzma & mcgee for bullock.
F N 11 wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Wow, so we're really running with the youth this year. Sounds good to me.
Not thinking this until Randle is gone.
newyorker4ever wrote:god shammgod wrote:i figured it out. kuzma & mcgee for bullock.
Mine was better of Kuzma & McGee for Knox or DSJ and a 2nd round pick. Not trading Bullock who's a good 3-D guy that we need.
HarthorneWingo wrote:F N 11 wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Wow, so we're really running with the youth this year. Sounds good to me.
Not thinking this until Randle is gone.
Damn, I forgot. But check out this tweet from Frank. He must've forgot too.
"It's very young but it looks good I think." (See, dangling participle again)
?s=20
god shammgod wrote:

robillionaire wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:F N 11 wrote:Not thinking this until Randle is gone.
Damn, I forgot. But check out this tweet from Frank. He must've forgot too.
"It's very young but it looks good I think." (See, dangling participle again)
?s=20
that's not frank
god shammgod wrote:

robillionaire wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:F N 11 wrote:Not thinking this until Randle is gone.
Damn, I forgot. But check out this tweet from Frank. He must've forgot too.
"It's very young but it looks good I think." (See, dangling participle again)
?s=20
that's not frank