Game 10: Packers at Colts - 3:25 - FOX

Post #361 » by **MickeyDavis** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:48 am

Of course lol

skones · Post #362 » by **skones** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:48 am

Standard

trwi7 · Post #363 » by **trwi7** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:48 am

Post #364 » by **humanrefutation** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:48 am

MVS giveth, MVS taketh away.

ampd · Post #365 » by **ampd** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:48 am

rilamann wrote::D
MickeyDavis wrote:
rilamann wrote:As good as Aaron Rodgers has been over his career, there's probably 10 QBs I'd rather have in this position. Lets see if Rodgers can make me eat those words.

Eat it lol

Only if we win overtime lol. Which we won't, because we're the Packers. Pretty sure we made a deal with the football Gods back in 2009 that if they let us win 1 super bowl with Mike McCarthy, we have to lose every overtime game until 2030.

lmao you were saying?

dedned · Post #366 » by **dedned** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:48 am

**** a. too funny.

Iheartfootball · Post #367 » by **Iheartfootball** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:48 am

Of course.

MikeIsGood · Post #368 » by **MikeIsGood** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:48 am

What a wonderful weekend.

Post #369 » by **MickeyDavis** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:48 am

Just need a bunch of holds

Bernman · Post #370 » by **Bernman** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:48 am

MissKhriddleton wrote:Can't believe he missed Tunyan.

It was set up by wasting so much time previously, meaning in the back of his mind he always knew he couldn't take a sack there. So was on his back foot the whole time and going through one read.

edit: and that's practically ballgame, should have won it while you could

awd4cy · Post #371 » by **awd4cy** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:49 am

Like the last ot win I remember was Bret Favre in Denver. It seriously feels like every ot game since was a loss.

Ayt · Post #372 » by **Ayt** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:49 am

That wasn't even a good strip attempt.

trwi7 · Post #373 » by **trwi7** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:49 am

Even when we manage to get the advantage in OT (a rarity) we manage to **** it up in the most spectacular possible way.

Iheartfootball · Post #374 » by **Iheartfootball** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:49 am

Do I I even keep watching?

Post #375 » by **humanrefutation** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:49 am

I didn't understand why they took so long on that drive. They should have had multiple shots at the end zone.

dedned · Post #376 » by **dedned** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:50 am

humanrefutation wrote:I didn't understand why they took so long on that drive. They should have had multiple shots at the end zone.

Cause they wasted downs spiking it then ran time off the clock on 3rd down.

trwi7 · Post #377 » by **trwi7** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:50 am

humanrefutation wrote:I didn't understand why they took so long on that drive. They should have had multiple shots at the end zone.

It was McCarthy like and Rodgers being conservative as hell which we see way too much.

Iheartfootball · Post #378 » by **Iheartfootball** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:51 am

Iheartfootball wrote:
trwi7 wrote:
Iheartfootball wrote:Please no heartbreak city.

Are you new?

I’m trying optimism after all my negative posts today. Balance it out.

I’m also realistic.

*edit - by realistic I mean I expect them to lose in spectacular fashion.

There. Just ruined my optimism.

trwi7 · Post #379 » by **trwi7** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:52 am

He'll miss, we'll call timeout and then he'll make it.

rilamann · Post #380 » by **rilamann** » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:52 am

Easiest bet in the NFL: Anyone on the Packers schedule capable of going at least 10-6, mark down as a loss for the Packers.