ImageImageImageImageImage

2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
aq_ua
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,626
And1: 7,705
Joined: May 08, 2002
Location: Optimistic but realistic

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#581 » by aq_ua » Wed Nov 25, 2020 1:35 am

There's been so much wasted time, energy and money on the election, the bigger existential threats like climate change have really lost top billing. Can we get a broader current events thread going?

John Kerry appointment as NSC member focused on climate change is a good move but still feels too political. I understand appointments are going to be varied, but if you're going to appoint a progressive anywhere, climate change seems like the obvious place to do it.
User avatar
Barcs
Analyst
Posts: 3,205
And1: 865
Joined: Jan 27, 2013
Location: NJ
       

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#582 » by Barcs » Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:16 am

Jethrobodine123 wrote:It's good to see the transition finally "officially" taking place.

However, we have to remind ourselves that the Republican party would have been just fine with Trump stealing the election and subverting democracy. Just think about that for a second. That's just utterly amazing really. Let's not mince any words here, this was an attempted coup.

I don't subscribe to the thinking of some Democrats that let bygone be bygone and get on with governing without there being some sort of legal ramification for what went on during the past 4 years.

I can't imagine what the incoming group will find when they look behind the closed doors of every single department in the government. It could be epic.

Jethro


Agreed. This is why winning the senate is more important than ever. We need to make sure this type of crap can never happen again and undo this huge mess. Pack the court or impeach Barrett, fix voter suppression and reform the system as a whole, abolish EC, hold the Trump enablers accountable. Democrats need to be ruthless now. None of this forgive and forget nonsense. That will only encourage them to do it again, only with more competent people next time. We can't ever have an administration with that level of disinfo and lies again.
SELL THE TEAM, JIM!!! :curse:
User avatar
Barcs
Analyst
Posts: 3,205
And1: 865
Joined: Jan 27, 2013
Location: NJ
       

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#583 » by Barcs » Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:26 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:I love these videos



LOL what a bunch of nutbags! I'm going to pray away my creepy neighbor! Yeah that's not confirmation bias at all! :banghead:
SELL THE TEAM, JIM!!! :curse:
User avatar
Fat Kat
RealGM
Posts: 34,924
And1: 35,660
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
     

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#584 » by Fat Kat » Wed Nov 25, 2020 3:08 am

Read on Twitter
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
Oscirus
RealGM
Posts: 13,529
And1: 9,531
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
       

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#585 » by Oscirus » Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:04 am

Fat Kat wrote:
Read on Twitter

He said a whole lotta nothing there. No idea who his handler is but they need to do better cuz both sides have reason to have beef with that announcement.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,232
And1: 62,367
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#586 » by HarthorneWingo » Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:52 am

aq_ua wrote:There's been so much wasted time, energy and money on the election, the bigger existential threats like climate change have really lost top billing. Can we get a broader current events thread going?

John Kerry appointment as NSC member focused on climate change is a good move but still feels too political. I understand appointments are going to be varied, but if you're going to appoint a progressive anywhere, climate change seems like the obvious place to do it.


I hope we can have our own CA thread. 2021 is going to be crazy.

From the headline reading I've done, it appears that progressives feel that they can work with Biden's cabinet though I'm concerned about two, in particular: Rahm Emanuel as Transportation Secretary and some DuPont executive as head of the EPA. I don't know if those are done deals or not.
Free Palestine
Oscirus
RealGM
Posts: 13,529
And1: 9,531
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
       

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#587 » by Oscirus » Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:09 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:
aq_ua wrote:There's been so much wasted time, energy and money on the election, the bigger existential threats like climate change have really lost top billing. Can we get a broader current events thread going?

John Kerry appointment as NSC member focused on climate change is a good move but still feels too political. I understand appointments are going to be varied, but if you're going to appoint a progressive anywhere, climate change seems like the obvious place to do it.


I hope we can have our own CA thread. 2021 is going to be crazy.

From the headline reading I've done, it appears that progressives feel that they can work with Biden's cabinet though I'm concerned about two, in particular: Rahm Emanuel as Transportation Secretary and some DuPont executive as head of the EPA. I don't know if those are done deals or not.

Dont know about the dupont exec, but id be shocked if he goes through with rahm given the protests being kicked up esp by his fav demo
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,232
And1: 62,367
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#588 » by HarthorneWingo » Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:44 am

:lol:

Read on Twitter
?s=20
Free Palestine
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,392
And1: 27,069
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#589 » by Jalen Bluntson » Wed Nov 25, 2020 1:09 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote::lol:

Read on Twitter
?s=20


What wars did we start in the last four years? How many wars were we in 5 years ago?
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,467
And1: 95,155
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#590 » by thebuzzardman » Wed Nov 25, 2020 1:16 pm

Worth sharing:

Image
Image
Moose
Analyst
Posts: 3,733
And1: 1,677
Joined: Feb 20, 2002

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#591 » by Moose » Wed Nov 25, 2020 1:57 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote::lol:

Read on Twitter
?s=20


This doesn't even make sense.
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,232
And1: 62,367
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#592 » by HarthorneWingo » Wed Nov 25, 2020 3:44 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:Worth sharing:

Image



Did you enjoy your evening, last night?
Free Palestine
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,095
And1: 24,422
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#593 » by Pointgod » Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:21 pm

aq_ua wrote:There's been so much wasted time, energy and money on the election, the bigger existential threats like climate change have really lost top billing. Can we get a broader current events thread going?

John Kerry appointment as NSC member focused on climate change is a good move but still feels too political. I understand appointments are going to be varied, but if you're going to appoint a progressive anywhere, climate change seems like the obvious place to do it.


Kerry was the person who negotiated the Paris Climate Accords. He’s also been Secretary of State and the most important thing is that the position has been added to the National Security Council which means it’s going to be a global issue. Biden will still name his domestic climate czar which will probably be someone Progressives will back. Hell if I was him I’d name Jay Inslee. But the fact that climate is being treated as a national and global issue means that climate activists are actually winning.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,095
And1: 24,422
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#594 » by Pointgod » Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:25 pm

Oscirus wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:
Read on Twitter

He said a whole lotta nothing there. No idea who his handler is but they need to do better cuz both sides have reason to have beef with that announcement.


If he adds a Republican to a completely powerless position that they’re qualified for does it really matter? A very sneaky move would be to assign a Senate Republican in a blue state to a powerless position.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,095
And1: 24,422
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#595 » by Pointgod » Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:30 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
aq_ua wrote:There's been so much wasted time, energy and money on the election, the bigger existential threats like climate change have really lost top billing. Can we get a broader current events thread going?

John Kerry appointment as NSC member focused on climate change is a good move but still feels too political. I understand appointments are going to be varied, but if you're going to appoint a progressive anywhere, climate change seems like the obvious place to do it.


I hope we can have our own CA thread. 2021 is going to be crazy.

From the headline reading I've done, it appears that progressives feel that they can work with Biden's cabinet though I'm concerned about two, in particular: Rahm Emanuel as Transportation Secretary and some DuPont executive as head of the EPA. I don't know if those are done deals or not.


To correct you the freak out was over a former DuPont executive on the transition team. Which was probably a little bit of an overreaction. People should wait to actually see who he names for director of EPA before losing their ****. Although I think everyone agrees Rahm Emanuel needs to **** all the way off
Oscirus
RealGM
Posts: 13,529
And1: 9,531
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
       

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#596 » by Oscirus » Wed Nov 25, 2020 5:32 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Oscirus wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:
Read on Twitter

He said a whole lotta nothing there. No idea who his handler is but they need to do better cuz both sides have reason to have beef with that announcement.


If he adds a Republican to a completely powerless position that they’re qualified for does it really matter? A very sneaky move would be to assign a Senate Republican in a blue state to a powerless position.

There are no completely powerless positions and if he hires a trump supporting republican but not a straight up progressive, there will be huge problems down the line. That just better be a talking point
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#597 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Nov 25, 2020 7:25 pm

Are We Ther Yet wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote::lol:

Read on Twitter
?s=20


What wars did we start in the last four years? How many wars were we in 5 years ago?


Iraq and Afghanistan were initiated by Bush so what's your point?
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#598 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Nov 25, 2020 7:29 pm

Pointgod wrote:
aq_ua wrote:There's been so much wasted time, energy and money on the election, the bigger existential threats like climate change have really lost top billing. Can we get a broader current events thread going?

John Kerry appointment as NSC member focused on climate change is a good move but still feels too political. I understand appointments are going to be varied, but if you're going to appoint a progressive anywhere, climate change seems like the obvious place to do it.


Kerry was the person who negotiated the Paris Climate Accords. He’s also been Secretary of State and the most important thing is that the position has been added to the National Security Council which means it’s going to be a global issue. Biden will still name his domestic climate czar which will probably be someone Progressives will back. Hell if I was him I’d name Jay Inslee. But the fact that climate is being treated as a national and global issue means that climate activists are actually winning.


Yes, and I'd say putting a recent Secretary of State in the position signals a strong intent here and abroad to make serious efforts on climate accords and international collaborations.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#599 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Nov 25, 2020 7:32 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Oscirus wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:
Read on Twitter

He said a whole lotta nothing there. No idea who his handler is but they need to do better cuz both sides have reason to have beef with that announcement.


If he adds a Republican to a completely powerless position that they’re qualified for does it really matter? A very sneaky move would be to assign a Senate Republican in a blue state to a powerless position.


As far as Warren and Sanders are concerned, aren't they better off using their seniority in the Senate and holding down their seats anyway?
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#600 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Nov 25, 2020 7:38 pm

Moose wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote::lol:

Read on Twitter
?s=20


This doesn't even make sense.


Those two tweets don't particularly go together. One is basically saying to Trump "Hey stupid the markets are going up because Biden's transition has started. You don't get credit for that."

The comment tweet was a fairly arbitrary response that could have appeared anywhere IMO, but it does make sense as a standalone comment

Earlier in his term Trump was threatening the nuclear annihilation of North Korea

Trump repeatedly asked military members on his cabinet why he couldn't blow off some nukes in a military exercise and they had to keep telling him that's now how it works

He is anything but a stable genius. Sane people have had plenty of reasons to be concerned about this lunatic's finger on the button. That's what that tweet is saying regardless of its relevance to the other tweet

Return to New York Knicks