gswhoops wrote:FutureKnicksGM wrote:gswhoops wrote:I don't think anyone's arguing that Randle isn't more useful than Batum strictly on the court, but that's a bar so low an ant could trip on it. But it's not like Randle is some stud either. He is who he's always been - a guy whose counting stats look nice because he eats up a lot of minutes and possessions, but ultimately not a guy who contributes to winning basketball in a big role. Maybe he could be Trez-lite if he took a bench role and focused on taking on second units, but even in that case he's making more in one year than the actual Trez is in two.
Batum at 1 year/$27M and off the books completely by 2021 vs. Randle at 1 year/$23M with $4M on the books for 2021 isn't some vast chasm of value difference. If you prefer Randle, I understand that. But it's not ridiculous to think a second or two might close the gap for a rebuilding team that just drafted an offense-minded PF 8th overall.
Disagree. 2nds for contract difference - fine. Randle is at worst a good 6th man, whereas Batum is 15th man at best. Your team just traded a future protected first for that level player in Oubre, while absorbing his contract for free (despite historic tax implications) whereas in this situation the Knicks are taking on more money to take on absolute dead weight.
I think we'll have to agree to disagree on Randle as a player then. I have Oubre as a clearly better player at a more valuable position.
I'm not sure how you land there given:
BPM - Oubre -0.5, Randle -0.3
VORP - Oubre 0.7, Randle 0.9
RPM - Oubre -3.05, Randle -0.75
But yes, agree to disagree.