ImageImage

Fool Me Twice: The Gordon Hayward Thread

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,767
And1: 9,452
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#781 » by Braggins » Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:14 am

BigSlam wrote:
Braggins wrote:
Spoiler:
BlackOutBuzz wrote:
What a weird structure. So he gets the full 5% raises between years 1 and 2 & 3 and 4, but the middle years are effectively flat.

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app

Is it just me, or does it make absolutely no sense to not front load his deal?

It might to Charlotte, but not to Gordo.

Accepting the terms to a contract are a 2 way street after all.

BlackOutBuzz wrote:I was certainly hoping for it, and Boston could've gotten a larger TPE had that happened. I have to imagine this was a sticking point for Gordon. I was hopeful after the Rozier contract, but most players just don't wanna make less money as they get older.

I wouldn't have thought it mattered that much to Hayward. Its the same money either way and Hayward seems like a guy that is probably very smart with his money. I'd assume that the vast majority of his salary is going directly into savings accounts or long term investments.
Bassman
Head Coach
Posts: 6,156
And1: 2,156
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Bye FL back to MO; NC born & bred
       

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#782 » by Bassman » Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:31 am

Wow, just kinda shocked by this...but then again not.

I will say the Hornets finally have someone who could be/should be a go-to shooter/scorer.

What does our lineup look like relative to projected starters and minutes?
I continue to wait...and hope...for the return to Hornet's glory.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,547
And1: 6,368
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#783 » by JMAC3 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:32 am

316Hornets wrote:
Rich4114 wrote:Wait, so some of you would rather just sign Hayward than sign Hayward and get two future second round picks just to spite Boston so they can’t have a massive trade exception that is highly unlikely to be used?


I'd say it's highly likely they do use the TPE, not necessarily all of it but some for sure. They are capped out and it's the only way they'll be able to add talent. I think they are still 1 or 2 pieces away from being contenders.

My biggest gripe is I think we could've squeezed more out of them. I'd rather show them we mean business than accept picks that will likely never materialize into anything. How often does a guy drafted 50+ see any meaningful minutes?


To be honest I am not mad what we got from Boston because realistically they were not giving up a first in that trade, I am more mad we couldn't turn those two seconds and our assets into dumping Batum. OKC probably demanded a first to take on Batum.
User avatar
luciano-davidwesley
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,057
And1: 2,754
Joined: Aug 03, 2002
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:
   

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#784 » by luciano-davidwesley » Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:48 am

This whole thing has just been a massive dumpster fire. We could not have played this free agency much worse if we tried.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,547
And1: 6,368
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#785 » by JMAC3 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:59 am

luciano-davidwesley wrote:This whole thing has just been a massive dumpster fire. We could not have played this free agency much worse if we tried.


Yeah I get where most are coming from, but at least we actually paid a guy who is guaranteed to start for us for next 4 years. I think a bunch of guys who signed for the 60-80 million dollar deals are going to be coming off the bench if not from day 1, very soon.

Out of Bogdanovic, Beasley, Galo, Jerami Grant, Marcus Morris, Bertans - would be surprised if 3 of them starters opening day next year and they all signed for 3 years... so they a bunch will be backups for 2-3 years.
SMTBSI
RealGM
Posts: 15,920
And1: 25,281
Joined: Jun 27, 2014
 

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#786 » by SMTBSI » Mon Nov 30, 2020 3:18 am

luciano-davidwesley wrote:
SMTBSI wrote:This was always going to be the outcome. Guarantee we had our portion of it worked out days ago, and were just waiting to see if you could make any magic happen about Batum.

Stealing each other's stars in consecutive years notwithstanding, all signs point to our front offices actually having a decent working relationship. Both voluntarily helped the other to recover some value afterwards, and didn't ask for much in return.

I think fans have a very different approach to these things than GMs, and are much more willing to spite each other's teams. GMs need to keep the relationships functioning.

The relationship of Charlotte getting bent over by Boston? Boston is just fortunate Charlotte is being run by incompetent fools.

What happened made perfect sense to me. Was calling it all week.

First of all, this was a rarity in sports negotiation in that it was not a zero-sum game. Boston had something to gain, but you had nothing to lose. Giving us the TPE cost you absolutely nothing. The value that was going to be paid was the lowest value that you would not actually walk away from in favor of getting nothing.

Secondly, we voluntarily helped you recoup some value after we snagged Kemba. That came in the form of Rozier, but also could have been a $16mil TPE, if you had preferred that instead of Rozier. You preferred Rozier. The price we asked for that was a single 2nd swap that moved us up from #56 to #47 in the 2020 draft.

In a very similar situation, we just payed you about four times that much for this TPE. If anything, you came out on top of the two negotiations.

You certainly did not get "bent over". Your GM behaved rationally, got something for nothing, and repayed a favor. Our front offices should be on good terms after all this.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,547
And1: 6,368
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#787 » by JMAC3 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 3:22 am

SMTBSI wrote:
luciano-davidwesley wrote:
SMTBSI wrote:This was always going to be the outcome. Guarantee we had our portion of it worked out days ago, and were just waiting to see if you could make any magic happen about Batum.

Stealing each other's stars in consecutive years notwithstanding, all signs point to our front offices actually having a decent working relationship. Both voluntarily helped the other to recover some value afterwards, and didn't ask for much in return.

I think fans have a very different approach to these things than GMs, and are much more willing to spite each other's teams. GMs need to keep the relationships functioning.

The relationship of Charlotte getting bent over by Boston? Boston is just fortunate Charlotte is being run by incompetent fools.

What happened made perfect sense to me. Was calling it all week.

First of all, this was a rarity in sports negotiation in that it was not a zero-sum game. Boston had something to gain, but you had nothing to lose. Giving us the TPE cost you absolutely nothing. The value that was going to be paid was the lowest value that you would not actually walk away from in favor of getting nothing.

Secondly, we voluntarily helped you recoup some value after we snagged Kemba. That came in the form of Rozier, but also could have been a $16mil TPE, if you had preferred that instead of Rozier. You preferred Rozier. The price we asked for that was a single 2nd swap that moved us up from #56 to #47 in the 2020 draft.

In a very similar situation, we just payed you about four times that much for this TPE. If anything, you came out on top of the two negotiations.

You certainly did not get "bent over". Your GM behaved rationally, got something for nothing, and repayed a favor. Our front offices should be on good terms after all this.


Okay man, thanks for the explanation. Good luck this season, we will hop over to the Celtics board if we have any more questions for you.
SMTBSI
RealGM
Posts: 15,920
And1: 25,281
Joined: Jun 27, 2014
 

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#788 » by SMTBSI » Mon Nov 30, 2020 3:24 am

JMAC3 wrote:
SMTBSI wrote:
luciano-davidwesley wrote:The relationship of Charlotte getting bent over by Boston? Boston is just fortunate Charlotte is being run by incompetent fools.

What happened made perfect sense to me. Was calling it all week.

First of all, this was a rarity in sports negotiation in that it was not a zero-sum game. Boston had something to gain, but you had nothing to lose. Giving us the TPE cost you absolutely nothing. The value that was going to be paid was the lowest value that you would not actually walk away from in favor of getting nothing.

Secondly, we voluntarily helped you recoup some value after we snagged Kemba. That came in the form of Rozier, but also could have been a $16mil TPE, if you had preferred that instead of Rozier. You preferred Rozier. The price we asked for that was a single 2nd swap that moved us up from #56 to #47 in the 2020 draft.

In a very similar situation, we just payed you about four times that much for this TPE. If anything, you came out on top of the two negotiations.

You certainly did not get "bent over". Your GM behaved rationally, got something for nothing, and repayed a favor. Our front offices should be on good terms after all this.


Okay man, thanks for the explanation. Good luck this season, we will hop over to the Celtics board if we have any more questions for you.

All right, I'll take off. Not trying to rub salt in wounds. I'm just genuinely a bit baffled by how both your fanbase and mine viewed this negotiation.

Good luck to you too. I do think Hayward is going to ball this year.
vtime
Rookie
Posts: 1,227
And1: 298
Joined: May 29, 2006
Location: SAINT LOUIS, MO

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#789 » by vtime » Mon Nov 30, 2020 3:32 am

I was curious why no one ever mentions that Rozier and Hayward were together in Boston
wilson115
Veteran
Posts: 2,513
And1: 1,678
Joined: Aug 21, 2020
 

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#790 » by wilson115 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 3:48 am

luciano-davidwesley wrote:I would have walked away without helping Boston if they wouldn't include at least a late first. Seeing as though we are stretching Batum regardless what we got back in this deal is nearly worthless. Giving them 30 million TPE for two almost worthless late seconds. I guarantee Ainge would have given up a first if we called his bluff but Kupcake is a weak negotiator.

If he doesn't bite who cares because we are stretching Batum anyway and the two late seconds are pretty much garbage. Why help Ainge for nearly free?

Could've used that first to move Nic's contract. Thought avoiding the cap hit was the whole point. Incomprehensible.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,547
And1: 6,368
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#791 » by JMAC3 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 3:56 am

wilson115 wrote:
luciano-davidwesley wrote:I would have walked away without helping Boston if they wouldn't include at least a late first. Seeing as though we are stretching Batum regardless what we got back in this deal is nearly worthless. Giving them 30 million TPE for two almost worthless late seconds. I guarantee Ainge would have given up a first if we called his bluff but Kupcake is a weak negotiator.

If he doesn't bite who cares because we are stretching Batum anyway and the two late seconds are pretty much garbage. Why help Ainge for nearly free?

Could've used that first to move Nic's contract. Thought avoiding the cap hit was the whole point. Incomprehensible.


There is no way they are giving up a first for the TPE. For one they may not even end up using it (75% of them expire). Secondly if they give up a first to get the TPE what are they going to attach to the TPE when they go to use it? Another first?

Maybe if Boston had an extra first laying around, but with them only owning their own firsts it was never happening.

Sucks we could not get a third team involved, but again no way Boston was giving us a first in this scenario.
wilson115
Veteran
Posts: 2,513
And1: 1,678
Joined: Aug 21, 2020
 

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#792 » by wilson115 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 4:02 am

JMAC3 wrote:
wilson115 wrote:
luciano-davidwesley wrote:I would have walked away without helping Boston if they wouldn't include at least a late first. Seeing as though we are stretching Batum regardless what we got back in this deal is nearly worthless. Giving them 30 million TPE for two almost worthless late seconds. I guarantee Ainge would have given up a first if we called his bluff but Kupcake is a weak negotiator.

If he doesn't bite who cares because we are stretching Batum anyway and the two late seconds are pretty much garbage. Why help Ainge for nearly free?

Could've used that first to move Nic's contract. Thought avoiding the cap hit was the whole point. Incomprehensible.


There is no way they are giving up a first for the TPE. For one they may not even end up using it (75% of them expire). Secondly if they give up a first to get the TPE what are they going to attach to the TPE when they go to use it? Another first?

Maybe if Boston had an extra first laying around, but with them only owning their own firsts it was never happening.

Sucks we could not get a third team involved, but again no way Boston was giving us a first in this scenario.

Then there was no incentive to hand Ainge his TPE at all.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,547
And1: 6,368
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#793 » by JMAC3 » Mon Nov 30, 2020 4:06 am

wilson115 wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
wilson115 wrote:Could've used that first to move Nic's contract. Thought avoiding the cap hit was the whole point. Incomprehensible.


There is no way they are giving up a first for the TPE. For one they may not even end up using it (75% of them expire). Secondly if they give up a first to get the TPE what are they going to attach to the TPE when they go to use it? Another first?

Maybe if Boston had an extra first laying around, but with them only owning their own firsts it was never happening.

Sucks we could not get a third team involved, but again no way Boston was giving us a first in this scenario.

Then there was no incentive to hand Ainge his TPE at all.


Yeah I get it, it is never bad to have a couple extra second rounders. Cavs traded a couple expiring contracts and a second round pick for Drummond last season.

Also, with 9 million in cap space maybe we accept a bad contract for a few more seconds like everyone has been campaigning for.
User avatar
-Ian-
Analyst
Posts: 3,101
And1: 860
Joined: Nov 22, 2008
Location: Philippines
Contact:
 

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#794 » by -Ian- » Mon Nov 30, 2020 4:47 am

I'm curious to see how Mitch will spin this acquisition since this move has MJ's handprint. Stretching Nic's contract makes me sick. For Mitch and MJ's sake, they should pray to all the gods that this move won't blow up to their faces.
User avatar
luciano-davidwesley
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,057
And1: 2,754
Joined: Aug 03, 2002
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:
   

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#795 » by luciano-davidwesley » Mon Nov 30, 2020 5:01 am

SMTBSI wrote:
luciano-davidwesley wrote:
SMTBSI wrote:This was always going to be the outcome. Guarantee we had our portion of it worked out days ago, and were just waiting to see if you could make any magic happen about Batum.

Stealing each other's stars in consecutive years notwithstanding, all signs point to our front offices actually having a decent working relationship. Both voluntarily helped the other to recover some value afterwards, and didn't ask for much in return.

I think fans have a very different approach to these things than GMs, and are much more willing to spite each other's teams. GMs need to keep the relationships functioning.

The relationship of Charlotte getting bent over by Boston? Boston is just fortunate Charlotte is being run by incompetent fools.

What happened made perfect sense to me. Was calling it all week.

First of all, this was a rarity in sports negotiation in that it was not a zero-sum game. Boston had something to gain, but you had nothing to lose. Giving us the TPE cost you absolutely nothing. The value that was going to be paid was the lowest value that you would not actually walk away from in favor of getting nothing.

Secondly, we voluntarily helped you recoup some value after we snagged Kemba. That came in the form of Rozier, but also could have been a $16mil TPE, if you had preferred that instead of Rozier. You preferred Rozier. The price we asked for that was a single 2nd swap that moved us up from #56 to #47 in the 2020 draft.

In a very similar situation, we just payed you about four times that much for this TPE. If anything, you came out on top of the two negotiations.

You certainly did not get "bent over". Your GM behaved rationally, got something for nothing, and repayed a favor. Our front offices should be on good terms after all this.

If Kupcake was behaving rationally he would have left Boston to negotiate with Indiana and kept a wide berth of the train wreck he has just created.

The two late seconds are worthless and do nothing to repair any of the damage this sign and trade and stretch will do to this team over the next 4-5 years.
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,767
And1: 9,452
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#796 » by Braggins » Mon Nov 30, 2020 7:15 am

At least the front office managed to unite the forum by making sure no one was happy about how the Hayward thing turned out.
BeesWax
General Manager
Posts: 7,855
And1: 1,660
Joined: Jul 04, 2001
       

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#797 » by BeesWax » Mon Nov 30, 2020 12:14 pm

JMAC3 wrote:
wilson115 wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
There is no way they are giving up a first for the TPE. For one they may not even end up using it (75% of them expire). Secondly if they give up a first to get the TPE what are they going to attach to the TPE when they go to use it? Another first?

Maybe if Boston had an extra first laying around, but with them only owning their own firsts it was never happening.

Sucks we could not get a third team involved, but again no way Boston was giving us a first in this scenario.

Then there was no incentive to hand Ainge his TPE at all.


Yeah I get it, it is never bad to have a couple extra second rounders. Cavs traded a couple expiring contracts and a second round pick for Drummond last season.

Also, with 9 million in cap space maybe we accept a bad contract for a few more seconds like everyone has been campaigning for.

Once we had to waive Batum there was almost zero incentive to trade with Boston. We should have walked away and given them nothing. What we got was not worth the help we gave them. We were idiots to sign this guy in the first place and now we attached an extra 9 million a year to his awful contract because it is responsible for Batum lasting three years not one.
Spoiler:
Image
Image
User avatar
BlackOutBuzz
Hornets Forum Capologist
Posts: 7,795
And1: 3,004
Joined: Jan 22, 2012
Location: Burlington, NC
       

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#798 » by BlackOutBuzz » Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:13 pm

Now confirmed:

CHA 2022 2nd pick to Boston (top 55 protected)
BOS 2023 2nd pick to Charlotte
BOS 2024 2nd pick to Charlotte

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Hornets Picks by Year
2021: Bouknight, Jones, Thor, Lewis

Protection on future 1st* (to NYK); 2nds
2022: 1-18; CHA (31-55), TOR 2 (55-60)
2023: 1-16; BOS (GH)
2024: 1-14; BOS (GH)
2025: 1-14; CHA (31-55)
*Becomes two 2nds if unconveyed
User avatar
Snidely FC
Head Coach
Posts: 6,396
And1: 3,685
Joined: Jan 19, 2011
Location: Asheville, NC

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#799 » by Snidely FC » Mon Nov 30, 2020 2:14 pm

was thinking how much fun was going to be to see the Martin Twins and Jalen McDaniels swirl around Lamelo
i guess MJ & Kupchak think fans would rather see Hayward chuffing
Hornet Mania
General Manager
Posts: 9,155
And1: 8,659
Joined: Jul 05, 2014
Location: Dornbirn, Austria
     

Re: Hayward to Charlotte 4yr/120 million 

Post#800 » by Hornet Mania » Mon Nov 30, 2020 3:50 pm

Snidely FC wrote:was thinking how much fun was going to be to see the Martin Twins and Jalen McDaniels swirl around Lamelo
i guess MJ & Kupchak think fans would rather see Hayward chuffing


You never know, he might get hurt again and then we can watch our young talent get minutes by default while the team takes a massive cap hit :wink:

:(

Return to Charlotte Hornets