pepe1991 wrote:Xatticus wrote:pepe1991 wrote:oh and it looks like our buddy Mario Hezonja didn't menage to get any NBA offer and now is going to Greece.
If he only averaged 25 mpg as a rookie,allstar by now.. Where is my green font at?
It worked with Vucevic didn't it? He was really crappy for a really long time. We committed to his development and we were rewarded with a decent player that we then grossly overpaid.
But I get where you are coming from... we already have a collection of guys that can pile up stats while losing games, why bother replacing them with new faces that pile up stats and lose games? I think the hope that most of us harbor is that we eventually acquire and develop someone that can pile up stats on a team that actually wins games. All I ask is that we afford our high-ceiling talents the same opportunities that we afforded the slow and unathletic players that currently comprise our core. Or am I aiming too high?
Wtf are you talking about?
Vuc averaged 13 ppg, 12 rpg, 2 apg, 1 bpg on 53,4% TS in his second year in his nba career, including streach of end of a year where he was 20 -14 guy.
Granted, his TS% always tanked due his inability to draw any fouls whatsoever and he expended his 3 point range very late, but if we talk about his production in context of time, 22 years old, 13ppg, 12 rpg, 51,9% eFG guy in 2012-13 season, where league's averge eFG is 48,7% -- yea, that's a really solid starter at least.
Adding more context to his numbers: 2012-13
With 13 ppg he was 64th scorer in nba and SECOND best rebounder.
64th scorer in 2020 averaged 15,8 ppg. So , no, he was never terrible, by today's standards your "terrible" for him would be guy who has 16ppg, 14 rpg and is 22? Is that what you are implying? How does that expetations look in co-relation with 5ppg second year center who you here blame coach for not "developing and playing" ?
This is like taking credit of "development" of Tobias Harris. One day he can't come off bench for Bucks, 48 hours later he is 17ppg scorer. Magic really did some magic in that period ? Or guy was always good, just didn't have fair oportunity on other team?
And how do you suppose that team lost 62 games? Because we got murdered when Vucevic was on the floor (-8.3 net rating).
He averaged 13.1 points per game and 11.9 rebounds per game because he played 33.2 minutes per game. Fun fact: when you average 36 minutes per game, your per game averages mirror your per 36 minute averages. Bamba averaged 13.6 points per 36 minutes, 12.4 rebounds per 36 minutes, posted more than 3x as many blocks per 36 minutes, and posted a higher TS%, while posting a +0.5 net rating.
Bamba was objectively superior this past season to who Vucevic was in that first season with Orlando and he was younger to boot, yet you are the primary driving force on this forum proclaiming Bamba as a bust. Surely you must appreciate the contradiction here? What advantage did Vucevic have? He was gifted opportunties in Orlando instead of being tucked away behind an aging Elton Brand and a 23-year-old Spencer Hawes on a Philadelphia team that was preoccupied with reaching the playoffs.
What was the ultimate fate of that Philadelphia team? They tore it down a year later for a full-on rebuild which elevated them into the upper half of the Eastern Conference. Meanwhile, nine years later we are clinging to a 42-win season and two playoff wins so that we can snicker at the present predicaments of the Knicks and Cavs.












































