Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890

User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 45,038
And1: 14,320
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#821 » by Scoot McGroot » Tue Dec 8, 2020 4:11 pm

tobysunsfan wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:So, are the Clippers helping the Lakers here, or are the Lakers helping the Clippers? Or how do both the Lakers and the Clippers benefit from this?

What I'm trying to point out is that clearly those two teams haven't circumvented the cap because there's no reason they would help each other. But otherwise, each player would sign a contract that defines the payment for their play. If those players decide separately to give money to the other, that's their own deal. Players are not the team executives. They do however, have to handle taxes, gift taxes, and all sorts of other legalities on their own.


I'm not saying that the Lakers or Clippers are in collusion in any way. What I am saying is that it's possible if this type of stuff is allowed, for teams or players to circumvent the cap.

Let's say for arguments sake Giannis and LeBron shared a bank account. LeBron signed for the max this season, and Giannis is a free agent next season. By your logic, LeBron could say, have my salary next season as a gift, and you come sign for the minimum on the Lakers. By your logic, players are not the team executives, so they can do their own deals, so therefore in this scenario, where obviously the most ridiculous scenario has happened, it should totally be allowed.



Teams circumvent the cap. Players don’t. Players are not in control of a teams cap and legal structure and don’t answer to the league in this regard.

As for the whole Giannis and LeBron thing, if they want to take $40m less combined per year to play together, that’s not against the rules. Remember though, it takes 3 years for a team to gain full Bird Rights on a player, so, say Giannis and Lebron did this on their own, Giannis would be signing for the MLE at best next year, and then about $17.5m max the next year, before signing for a max after 3 full seasons.

The league would have nothing to say about this. But Giannis’ agent and the players association would absolutely hate this and push the players not to consider it. Lebron would be responsible for ALL the taxes on earning the salary, and then paying the gift taxes on giving the money to Giannis. He’d also be paying all his agent fees on the contract out as well. It’s a double or triple whammy in terms of cost to Lebron. Say he pays Giannis $40m of his salary out of pocket. He’d still be paying agent fees on it (limited to a max of 4%), so there’s about $1.6m. Federal, state, and local taxes would come out to just under 50%, so hypothetically another $18+m. Gift taxes on gifts over $1m are another 40%, so roughly another $15m.

Your arrangement would cost Lebron personally around $75m out of pocket for one year of this arrangement.
kalenclayton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,635
And1: 1,729
Joined: Feb 13, 2014
 

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#822 » by kalenclayton » Tue Dec 8, 2020 7:21 pm

Read on Twitter

I’m assuming this means he is not getting traded yet.
User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,746
And1: 8,631
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#823 » by K_chile22 » Tue Dec 8, 2020 7:26 pm

kalenclayton wrote:
Read on Twitter

I’m assuming this means he is not getting traded yet.
I didn't think he was actually never going to show up given walls comments. Even if he did, it probably didn't effect the timeline all that much
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,453
And1: 5,422
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#824 » by Mr B » Tue Dec 8, 2020 7:46 pm

kalenclayton wrote:
Read on Twitter

I’m assuming this means he is not getting traded yet.

If I’m the Rockets I wait until the trade deadline. Harden is under contract and they are under no obligation to trade him before the season starts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,330
And1: 20,926
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#825 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Dec 9, 2020 2:05 pm

Read on Twitter


If it weren't for Detroit's poor choices...
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,632
And1: 14,313
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#826 » by HornetJail » Wed Dec 9, 2020 2:10 pm

notice how only the poorly run organizations stretch big contracts
investigate Adam Silver
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 45,038
And1: 14,320
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#827 » by Scoot McGroot » Wed Dec 9, 2020 2:21 pm

Could see Indy stretch Jalen Lecque today as he only has this year guaranteed, but could be stretched over 5 years for a little under $300k per year, while allowing us to keep Kelan Martin and stay under the tax this year.
User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,388
And1: 6,845
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#828 » by MasterIchiro » Wed Dec 9, 2020 2:31 pm

KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:notice how only the poorly run organizations stretch big contracts


Teams that draft LaMelo + PJ + Devonte' that even after adding Hayward are the youngest team in the NBA with the third(?) lowest salary commitment heading into next season are far from poorly run. Kupchak also didn't sign Batum. The last GM did. Kupchak didn't want it standing in the way of signing a free agent who will boost the rebuild by making everyone better in it. And it's not like Kupchak could have moved Batum without spending a first round pick.

Is Hayward + first round pick + 2 Boston seconds worth more than Batum cap (27.5 m) + 9 million dollars?

I mean, really.
It has been written...
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#829 » by BullyKing » Wed Dec 9, 2020 2:39 pm

MasterIchiro wrote:
KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:notice how only the poorly run organizations stretch big contracts


Teams that draft LaMelo + PJ + Devonte' that even after adding Hayward are the youngest team in the NBA with the third(?) lowest salary commitment heading into next season are far from poorly run. Kupchak also didn't sign Batum. The last GM did. Kupchak didn't want it standing in the way of signing a free agent who will boost the rebuild by making everyone better in it. And it's not like Kupchak could have moved Batum without spending a first round pick.

Is Hayward + first round pick + 2 Boston seconds worth more than Batum cap (27.5 m) + 9 million dollars?

I mean, really.


Yes.

I mean how is this even up for a debate? A well-run organization doesn't need to go back to the Alonzo Mourning and Larry Johnson days to find even a modicum of success. Yes, that was a different organization which only proves the point. How is an organization that has never been even remotely close to contention well-run?
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,330
And1: 20,926
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#830 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Dec 9, 2020 2:39 pm

MasterIchiro wrote:
KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:notice how only the poorly run organizations stretch big contracts


Teams that draft LaMelo + PJ + Devonte' that even after adding Hayward are the youngest team in the NBA with the third(?) lowest salary commitment heading into next season are far from poorly run. Kupchak also didn't sign Batum. The last GM did. Kupchak didn't want it standing in the way of signing a free agent who will boost the rebuild by making everyone better in it. And it's not like Kupchak could have moved Batum without spending a first round pick.

Is Hayward + first round pick + 2 Boston seconds worth more than Batum cap (27.5 m) + 9 million dollars?

I mean, really.


Is Hayward on a (bad) contract and 2 late 2nds better than letting Batum expire is the fair question.

I say it is not.
BullyKing
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 13,441
And1: 14,114
Joined: Jan 16, 2014

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#831 » by BullyKing » Wed Dec 9, 2020 2:46 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:notice how only the poorly run organizations stretch big contracts


Teams that draft LaMelo + PJ + Devonte' that even after adding Hayward are the youngest team in the NBA with the third(?) lowest salary commitment heading into next season are far from poorly run. Kupchak also didn't sign Batum. The last GM did. Kupchak didn't want it standing in the way of signing a free agent who will boost the rebuild by making everyone better in it. And it's not like Kupchak could have moved Batum without spending a first round pick.

Is Hayward + first round pick + 2 Boston seconds worth more than Batum cap (27.5 m) + 9 million dollars?

I mean, really.


Is Hayward on a (bad) contract and 2 late 2nds better than letting Batum expire is the fair question.

I say it is not.


They also could have used the additional $20 million in space to acquire more assets like the Pistons originally did in the Ariza deal.

So is Hayward on a bad deal and 2 late 2nds better than a 1st and $50 million in space next year?

I don't even feel the need to answer the question.
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 35,676
And1: 18,177
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#832 » by babyjax13 » Wed Dec 9, 2020 2:49 pm

MasterIchiro wrote:
KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:notice how only the poorly run organizations stretch big contracts


Teams that draft LaMelo + PJ + Devonte' that even after adding Hayward are the youngest team in the NBA with the third(?) lowest salary commitment heading into next season are far from poorly run. Kupchak also didn't sign Batum. The last GM did. Kupchak didn't want it standing in the way of signing a free agent who will boost the rebuild by making everyone better in it. And it's not like Kupchak could have moved Batum without spending a first round pick.

Is Hayward + first round pick + 2 Boston seconds worth more than Batum cap (27.5 m) + 9 million dollars?

I mean, really.


Kupchak signed Loul Deng and Timofey Mozgov for a combined $35 million a year. I'm not sure why anyone would have faith in him, he's already proven to be a horrid GM, and I'm not sure why anyone would be excited that he couldn't move Cody Zeller for a reasonable cost to open cap space for Hayward. With Gordon coming in and likely pushing Bridges to the bench or playing him at shooting guard, they could have used him to move Zeller and get back a rotation piece from Detroit or New York (e.g. Reggie Bullock + 2nds). Instead they have Nic Batum tied around their foot like a boat anchor for the next three years and have once again put themselves in a place to get the 9th to 12th pick in the draft.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,880
And1: 25,207
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#833 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Wed Dec 9, 2020 3:06 pm

Batum+ for Ariza always made a ton of sense. I’m still not sure why that didn’t happen.
BuzzCity
Rookie
Posts: 1,145
And1: 609
Joined: Apr 21, 2014
 

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#834 » by BuzzCity » Wed Dec 9, 2020 3:07 pm

MasterIchiro wrote:Teams that draft LaMelo + PJ + Devonte' that even after adding Hayward are the youngest team in the NBA with the third(?) lowest salary commitment heading into next season are far from poorly run. Kupchak also didn't sign Batum. The last GM did. Kupchak didn't want it standing in the way of signing a free agent who will boost the rebuild by making everyone better in it. And it's not like Kupchak could have moved Batum without spending a first round pick.

Is Hayward + first round pick + 2 Boston seconds worth more than Batum cap (27.5 m) + 9 million dollars?

I mean, really.


We have easily been one of the worst run franchises since the NBA returned to Charlotte...the last 2 years gives me hope, but can u blame any non Hornets fan to think we r anything outside of a joke? I think it’s a more than fair assessment.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,632
And1: 14,313
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#835 » by HornetJail » Wed Dec 9, 2020 3:39 pm

MasterIchiro wrote:
KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:notice how only the poorly run organizations stretch big contracts


Teams that draft LaMelo + PJ + Devonte' that even after adding Hayward are the youngest team in the NBA with the third(?) lowest salary commitment heading into next season are far from poorly run. Kupchak also didn't sign Batum. The last GM did. Kupchak didn't want it standing in the way of signing a free agent who will boost the rebuild by making everyone better in it. And it's not like Kupchak could have moved Batum without spending a first round pick.

Is Hayward + first round pick + 2 Boston seconds worth more than Batum cap (27.5 m) + 9 million dollars?

I mean, really.

Has Mitch Kupchak's nephew hijacked your account or something?

For starters, a well run organization wouldn't have overpaid a 30-year-old non-star for four years with cap space they didn't have. That's just the verrrrrrry tip of the iceberg
investigate Adam Silver
User avatar
Scoot McGroot
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 45,038
And1: 14,320
Joined: Feb 16, 2005
     

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#836 » by Scoot McGroot » Wed Dec 9, 2020 3:54 pm

KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:notice how only the poorly run organizations stretch big contracts


Teams that draft LaMelo + PJ + Devonte' that even after adding Hayward are the youngest team in the NBA with the third(?) lowest salary commitment heading into next season are far from poorly run. Kupchak also didn't sign Batum. The last GM did. Kupchak didn't want it standing in the way of signing a free agent who will boost the rebuild by making everyone better in it. And it's not like Kupchak could have moved Batum without spending a first round pick.

Is Hayward + first round pick + 2 Boston seconds worth more than Batum cap (27.5 m) + 9 million dollars?

I mean, really.

Has Mitch Kupchak's nephew hijacked your account or something?

For starters, a well run organization wouldn't have overpaid a 30-year-old non-star for four years with cap space they didn't have. That's just the verrrrrrry tip of the iceberg



And, in all fairness, you can like/value the pieces you have and still hate the way you got them, or the price you paid to do so. Ultimately, it may be worth it, but it just seems that they could’ve done something better.
User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,388
And1: 6,845
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#837 » by MasterIchiro » Wed Dec 9, 2020 5:35 pm

KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:notice how only the poorly run organizations stretch big contracts


Teams that draft LaMelo + PJ + Devonte' that even after adding Hayward are the youngest team in the NBA with the third(?) lowest salary commitment heading into next season are far from poorly run. Kupchak also didn't sign Batum. The last GM did. Kupchak didn't want it standing in the way of signing a free agent who will boost the rebuild by making everyone better in it. And it's not like Kupchak could have moved Batum without spending a first round pick.

Is Hayward + first round pick + 2 Boston seconds worth more than Batum cap (27.5 m) + 9 million dollars?

I mean, really.

Has Mitch Kupchak's nephew hijacked your account or something?

For starters, a well run organization wouldn't have overpaid a 30-year-old non-star for four years with cap space they didn't have. That's just the verrrrrrry tip of the iceberg


And who hacked your account to spin Cho's Batum deal on a 5-time NBA champion GM who snared Pau Gasol for junk?

How is choosing Hayward + 1st round pick + 2 second round picks over Batum cap (27.5) + 9 million dollars separate a poor front office from a front office not run poorly?

Do you want to start itemizing both sides of the transaction because I don't. And it's not necessary to conclude the gap is not there unless you inject hyperbole.

We still have the youngest team in the NBA, despite Hayward.
We're still one of the few teams who owns all our first round picks plus extra second rounders, despite Batum, MKG, Marvin.
We still have some of the most cap space moving forward.
And we added a player who BENEFITS a rebuild because he's a playmaker.
It has been written...
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,632
And1: 14,313
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#838 » by HornetJail » Wed Dec 9, 2020 6:15 pm

MasterIchiro wrote:
KEMBAtheMETEOR wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:
Teams that draft LaMelo + PJ + Devonte' that even after adding Hayward are the youngest team in the NBA with the third(?) lowest salary commitment heading into next season are far from poorly run. Kupchak also didn't sign Batum. The last GM did. Kupchak didn't want it standing in the way of signing a free agent who will boost the rebuild by making everyone better in it. And it's not like Kupchak could have moved Batum without spending a first round pick.

Is Hayward + first round pick + 2 Boston seconds worth more than Batum cap (27.5 m) + 9 million dollars?

I mean, really.

Has Mitch Kupchak's nephew hijacked your account or something?

For starters, a well run organization wouldn't have overpaid a 30-year-old non-star for four years with cap space they didn't have. That's just the verrrrrrry tip of the iceberg


And who hacked your account to spin Cho's Batum deal on a 5-time NBA champion GM who snared Pau Gasol for junk?

How is choosing Hayward + 1st round pick + 2 second round picks over Batum cap (27.5) + 9 million dollars separate a poor front office from a front office not run poorly?

Do you want to start itemizing both sides of the transaction because I don't. And it's not necessary to conclude the gap is not there unless you inject hyperbole.

We still have the youngest team in the NBA, despite Hayward.
We're still one of the few teams who owns all our first round picks plus extra second rounders, despite Batum, MKG, Marvin.
We still have some of the most cap space moving forward.
And we added a player who BENEFITS a rebuild because he's a playmaker.

Yes Cho messed up a lot of things. I'm not pinning Batum's final year on Kupchak. The rest of your sentence just goes to show that the last trade Kupchak can point to and say "This went really well", happened 13 years ago on a team with a top 11 player of all time in the prime of his career.

To fix Cho's expensive treadmill, all Kupchak had to do was wait it out, and collect assets while rebuilding. Instead Kupchak has compounded Cho's stupid financial moves by making more bad ones. Taking on an extra year of Mozgov for just two 2nds and signing Terry Rozier to that contract were objectively bad financial and asset moves, though the latter has kinda sorta panned out as Rozier improved tremendously and is probably worth 2/3 of his contract.

Your claim that we have tons of cap space moving forward isn't even true. With no other trades, I estimate we have about $15-20M with Graham and Monk's RFA rights on the books and all other FAs renounced in the 2021 offseason. Devonte' will need another contract (that will basically replace Rozier's salary when he expires in 2022), and Malik too provided he picks up where he left off last season. With Hayward's $30M on the books for 3 years after that, Batum's dead money for 2 years after that, Graham and Monk's next contracts, and Miles due a year after that, I'm not seeing the best cap situation in the NBA. Who's coming to Charlotte to play with Devonte' Graham, Gordon Hayward, and LaMelo Ball without a substantial overpay like the one we just gave Hayward?

When you have limited assets, aren't a big market team, and you don't have a top tier coach/FO that can just find talent out of nowhere consistently, your only real path to anything more than a first round exit is to draft near the top. And with the Hayward signing, the Hornets aren't in a position to do that either. If we had say, Ujiri/Nick Nurse or Ainge/Stevens running the organization, I'd be more comfortable with picking in the middle and finding and developing pieces to get into contention, but we do not.

Remind me again how this is any better than Cho signing Al Jefferson, Lance Stephenson, and Marvin Williams to boost an under-talented team at the bottom to a perennial 7-10 seed. That rebuild was hastily cut short before enough top talent was acquired, so has this one.
investigate Adam Silver
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,330
And1: 20,926
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#839 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Dec 9, 2020 6:23 pm

MasterIchiro wrote:How is choosing Hayward + 1st round pick + 2 second round picks over Batum cap (27.5) + 9 million dollars separate a poor front office from a front office not run poorly?


Why do you keep repeating what is clearly a false choice?

You have to have read at least a few replies pointing out that the 2 options were just not:
A) Overpay Hayward and pay a 1st to do it
B) Overpay Hayward and instead stretch Batum

Posts on this board work much better when they are an actual dialogue, not an infomercial for a fan's team.
User avatar
MasterIchiro
RealGM
Posts: 21,388
And1: 6,845
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Location: The Dirty Water
       

Re: Free Agency, Rumors, Thoughts in General 2.0 

Post#840 » by MasterIchiro » Wed Dec 9, 2020 6:28 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
MasterIchiro wrote:How is choosing Hayward + 1st round pick + 2 second round picks over Batum cap (27.5) + 9 million dollars separate a poor front office from a front office not run poorly?


Why do you keep repeating what is clearly a false choice?

You have to have read at least a few replies pointing out that the 2 options were just not:
A) Overpay Hayward and pay a 1st to do it
B) Overpay Hayward and instead stretch Batum

Posts on this board work much better when they are an actual dialogue, not an infomercial for a fan's team.


I understand one option was to not move Batum because it cost one first round pick. And not sign Hayward. But that would mean I didn't want to sign Hayward in the first place despite the signing resulting in the Hornets remaining the youngest team, adding a player who benefits all the young players, having the third least committed salary next year, projected 27 million cap with Devonte' returning.

Infomercial my ass.
It has been written...

Return to Trades and Transactions