swarlesbarkley wrote:He looks like Monte Ellis to me. And I think that's a good thing.
ehh, Monta was fearless attacking the basket.
Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior
swarlesbarkley wrote:He looks like Monte Ellis to me. And I think that's a good thing.

tiderulz wrote:swarlesbarkley wrote:He looks like Monte Ellis to me. And I think that's a good thing.
ehh, Monta was fearless attacking the basket.


PrimeThyme wrote:Though I know I’ve been a detractor when it comes to his skill set, I have to admit that he does so many positive intangible things when he is on the floor that it makes it really hard for me not to like him.
I mean he gives full blown effort on every play. He was diving for balls on the floor in a preseason game the other night. If this kid doesn’t make it in this league, it certainly won’t be due to his motor or for a lack of trying. He wants to be great.
After some of the players we’ve had come through here over the last 8+ years or so, that’s pretty refreshing to say. Motor or effort level won’t ever be a question for him.
swarlesbarkley wrote:He looks like Monte Ellis to me. And I think that's a good thing.

PrimeThyme wrote:My fear is that’s what Cole is. A guard who is going to stuff the points category but not really effect the game in any meaningful way.

PrimeThyme wrote:swarlesbarkley wrote:He looks like Monte Ellis to me. And I think that's a good thing.
Relatively speaking, I’d say so. That would mean he becomes a rotational piece and potentially a starting level player which is what you’re looking for at the 15th spot.
However, being the next Monte Ellis isn't exactly a ringing endorsement. Monte Ellis put up some high point totals over his career, but it was on some bad teams and he was one of the least impactful (BPM, Vorp, etc) starting guards in the league during the time. I mean seriously, In his highest ppg season (26 ppg) he managed a -1.2 BPM and his team won 26 games. That’s really hard to do.
My fear is that’s what Cole is. A guard who is going to stuff the points category but not really effect the game in any meaningful way. My hope is that with his work ethic and his eagerness to improve, he will develop into more then that and can help us actually win games in the future.
Skybox wrote:what's the ultimate source of (accurate) measurables for NBA players? I'm aware that some sources would list Cole (and Jameer) at 6'3 lol. I love this kid's attack-mode and I was just wondering how he compares physically to so many other great scoring lead guards like Kemba, Kyrie, CJ, Dame, Murray, Westbrook, Trae, Fox, CP3, Mitchell, Rozier, Coby White, DRose, Curry, Oladipo, FVV, Lowry, Beal, Sexton, Garland, etc ...just for kicks. I'm not saying he's the Savior but I'm not saying he's not.![]()
I know there are other significant things than height, weight, wingspan but I'd like to know where he sits on those.

Xatticus wrote:My concerns with Anthony aren't really related to his size. I just don't like his game. Good offensive players make good decisions and Anthony doesn't make good decisions. To get away with being a poor decision-maker means you have to be a really good finisher/shooter and he doesn't appear to be that either. We just have to be patient and hope he develops.

SOUL wrote:Xatticus wrote:My concerns with Anthony aren't really related to his size. I just don't like his game. Good offensive players make good decisions and Anthony doesn't make good decisions. To get away with being a poor decision-maker means you have to be a really good finisher/shooter and he doesn't appear to be that either. We just have to be patient and hope he develops.
I think a small part of this is a bit of projection from a small sample size at UNC though, Xat. He hasn't made any egregious mistakes so far and if there's anything that Clifford can teach rookies, it's taking care of the ball and making simple passes. Cole moves the ball fairly well in the small amount we've seen from him (or as much as you'd want from a non-playmaking rookie guard), albeit someone who is ultimately going to look for his shot first. It's nothing special but not MCW Philly levels of not giving a ****. His shot looks like it has a quick release and he's comfortable pulling up from NBA range. Shot isn't fundamentally broken and he looks confident. He has some nice burst going to the rim and finished some plays I didn't think he would, but he's not going to get calls as a rookie. He's not Fultz crafty, but he just goes up pretty strong compared to what we're used to with DJ Augustin.
He will struggle by virtue of not being that big and not being crafty around the rim.
I think when it comes down to it he will be an average/below average finisher in the league eventually while being a good shooter and completely average playmaker. But he does have massive potential as a scorer. I can't say if he will be efficient or not, but I think a statement of "doesn't appear to be a good shooter" definitely fits as a quote to LaMelo.

To be nitpicking with the 15th pick, given we picked a player that has a skill set we desperate need is rather funny.RookieStar wrote:With the 15th pick, we cant expect to win the lotto and draft the next Giannis. Even if we did, Giannis as a rookie was waaaaay different than the Giannis now.
This might be an unpopular opinion, but our 15th pick showed way more offensive potential and production than our last few lotto picks ( cough cough JI Bamba Mario AG )
Optimus_Steel wrote:To be nitpicking with the 15th pick, given we picked a player that has a skill set we desperate need is rather funny.RookieStar wrote:With the 15th pick, we cant expect to win the lotto and draft the next Giannis. Even if we did, Giannis as a rookie was waaaaay different than the Giannis now.
This might be an unpopular opinion, but our 15th pick showed way more offensive potential and production than our last few lotto picks ( cough cough JI Bamba Mario AG )
Sent from my Pixel 5 using RealGM mobile app