coldfish wrote:Unfortunately, he is a streaky scorer and that's one of the toughest things for fans to digest in a young player. Its automatic that people wonder "if he could just play at his peak all the time, he would be a superstar!!!"
So, Lauri has had good games. He has been "good". Lots of young players do that though. In order to be a positive net player you need to have something else in your game that allows you to contribute even when your shot is off and he doesn't have it. Its early but right now, it sure doesn't look like he added it in his long offseason.
And let's not forget that everyone eventually gets scouted out. If you don't constantly add new wrinkles to your game, or drastically improve the skills you already have, you will become a worse player simply by being the
same player. Simply not improving at a pace higher than the league's understanding of how to play against you is the same as regressing.
Lauri, as bad as he has been, isn't even the worst culprit. Brandon Jennings, of course, had his greatest ever performance in his seventh game. Michael Carter-Williams had his greatest performance in literally his first ever game.
bullsnewdynasty wrote:I would absolutely be on board with pumping up Lauri's trade value early in the year and getting a young asset from another team still transfixed by his potential.
Most likely, all another couple months is going to do is expose his awful defense and lack of overall skills even more.
The league has sussed him, and players like him, out. Ryan Anderson is only 32 and completely out of the league now.