Marrrcuss wrote:Ahhh, we diminishing Klay to prop Curry, huh
I think this is to say Klay is more important to the overall scheme and is bringing Curry down.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Marrrcuss wrote:Ahhh, we diminishing Klay to prop Curry, huh
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:Marrrcuss wrote:Ahhh, we diminishing Klay to prop Curry, huh
I think this is to say Klay is more important to the overall scheme and is bringing Curry down.
bovice wrote:I've been laughed at for saying this since 2016. I think Steph curry is great and might be the most influential basketball player since kobe, but he's not a true #1 on a championship team.
Talk about a contradiction...
Pelly24 wrote:Steph is not a system player at all that's silly, but for all people talk about his ceiling raising, i always wondered about his floor raising capabilities and this year might give sort of an answer, even if he's 32 so that leaves the argument that he's not the same player. I'm certain Steph will average like 26/8/5 on 60 TS%>>>, but then again, maybe not, and maybe this team will suck? He might miss a lot of fourth quarters because of his team being blown out. I think 2014-2017 Westbrook would get a team like this playing at near a 47-win pace, and people swear that Westbrook was overrated during those years and that Steph was way better. Now we'll see. If this Warriors team wins 25 games I'd say Steph's been kinda exposed. Last year wasn't looking good but there weren't enough games to determine anything. This year is the real deal.
Also when I look at Steph, I just don't see a way for him to get easy buckets. IDK how good of an ISO player he is when facing elite defenders one-on-one

Pythagoras wrote:I just noticed that the OP compared Steph to Nick freaking Foles...
Steph will be in the HOF when his career is over. Foles, not so much.
PD28 wrote:If he plays out the full season, we get a real look at how well he can do carrying a team on his own. I for one, don't think he can do it but we shall see lol
Danny1616 wrote:PD28 wrote:If he plays out the full season, we get a real look at how well he can do carrying a team on his own. I for one, don't think he can do it but we shall see lol
Didn't he carry the Warriors to the finals after KD went down when they were down 2-0 to the Rockets and almost single handedly take a historically great defensive Raptors team to game 7 of the NBA finals?
Curry has proven himself already.
Lebron couldn't lead the Lakers to the playoffs before AD came, does that mean it proves Lebron can't lead a team by himself, lol? Da fuq?
Homer38 wrote:Danny1616 wrote:PD28 wrote:If he plays out the full season, we get a real look at how well he can do carrying a team on his own. I for one, don't think he can do it but we shall see lol
Didn't he carry the Warriors to the finals after KD went down when they were down 2-0 to the Rockets and almost single handedly take a historically great defensive Raptors team to game 7 of the NBA finals?
Curry has proven himself already.
Lebron couldn't lead the Lakers to the playoffs before AD came, does that mean it proves Lebron can't lead a team by himself, lol? Da fuq?
Klay Thompson had been their best players against the Raptors for the most part....26 PPG and TS% of over 70% in 5 games for Thompson against the Raptors!
Danny1616 wrote:Homer38 wrote:Danny1616 wrote:
Didn't he carry the Warriors to the finals after KD went down when they were down 2-0 to the Rockets and almost single handedly take a historically great defensive Raptors team to game 7 of the NBA finals?
Curry has proven himself already.
Lebron couldn't lead the Lakers to the playoffs before AD came, does that mean it proves Lebron can't lead a team by himself, lol? Da fuq?
Klay Thompson had been their best players against the Raptors for the most part....26 PPG and TS% of over 70% in 5 games for Thompson against the Raptors!
You think Klay would be getting the same looks if Curry was not in his team?
Curry was the highest usage player on that team by a mile.
Also I love that you ignore Curry putting up 37ppg, 8rpg and 7apg in the conference finals against the Blazers LMAO. No KD and the boy literally almost put up a 40 point triple double series. In that same series Klay shot an abysmal 37%.
Curry haters are **** NUTS.

Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Danny1616 wrote:PD28 wrote:If he plays out the full season, we get a real look at how well he can do carrying a team on his own. I for one, don't think he can do it but we shall see lol
Didn't he carry the Warriors to the finals after KD went down when they were down 2-0 to the Rockets and almost single handedly take a historically great defensive Raptors team to game 7 of the NBA finals?
Curry has proven himself already.
Lebron couldn't lead the Lakers to the playoffs before AD came, does that mean it proves Lebron can't lead a team by himself, lol? Da fuq?
Danny1616 wrote:Pelly24 wrote:Steph is not a system player at all that's silly, but for all people talk about his ceiling raising, i always wondered about his floor raising capabilities and this year might give sort of an answer, even if he's 32 so that leaves the argument that he's not the same player. I'm certain Steph will average like 26/8/5 on 60 TS%>>>, but then again, maybe not, and maybe this team will suck? He might miss a lot of fourth quarters because of his team being blown out. I think 2014-2017 Westbrook would get a team like this playing at near a 47-win pace, and people swear that Westbrook was overrated during those years and that Steph was way better. Now we'll see. If this Warriors team wins 25 games I'd say Steph's been kinda exposed. Last year wasn't looking good but there weren't enough games to determine anything. This year is the real deal.
Also when I look at Steph, I just don't see a way for him to get easy buckets. IDK how good of an ISO player he is when facing elite defenders one-on-one
I disagree, lol.
If you give Curry that OKC roster which won 47 games and guys like Stephen Adams, Enes Kanter, Oladipo, Gibson, Sabonis, Morrow etc. you easily get 50+ wins. You really think that Draymond, Wiggins, Oubre and Wiseman is a better supporting cast?![]()
Curry needs hard-nosed defensive minded players and big men that can protect the rim and set hard screens for him.
Homer38 wrote:Danny1616 wrote:Homer38 wrote:
Klay Thompson had been their best players against the Raptors for the most part....26 PPG and TS% of over 70% in 5 games for Thompson against the Raptors!
You think Klay would be getting the same looks if Curry was not in his team?
Curry was the highest usage player on that team by a mile.
Also I love that you ignore Curry putting up 37ppg, 8rpg and 7apg in the conference finals against the Blazers LMAO. No KD and the boy literally almost put up a 40 point triple double series. In that same series Klay shot an abysmal 37%.
Curry haters are **** NUTS.
No, but same thing for Curry without Thompson
Curry has an amazing career, but to be a top 15-20 players of all-time, you need to at least to compete for a playoff spot at some point in his career even if the team is garbage ... I'm not asking to win the title or things like that, but it would be bad for Curry if the warriors have one of the worst records in the NBA again this year.
