RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 (Rick Barry)

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,442
And1: 8,109
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 (Rick Barry) 

Post#1 » by trex_8063 » Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:37 am

2020 List
1. LeBron James
2. Michael Jordan
3. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
4. Bill Russell
5. Tim Duncan
6. Wilt Chamberlain
7. Magic Johnson
8. Shaquille O'Neal
9. Hakeem Olajuwon
10. Larry Bird
11. Kevin Garnett
12. Kobe Bryant
13. Jerry West
14. Oscar Robertson
15. Dirk Nowitzki
16. Karl Malone
17. David Robinson
18. Julius Erving
19. George Mikan
20. Moses Malone
21. Charles Barkley
22. Kevin Durant
23. Chris Paul
24. Stephen Curry
25. Bob Pettit
26. John Stockton
27. Steve Nash
28. Dwyane Wade
29. Patrick Ewing
30. Walt Frazier
31. James Harden
32. Scottie Pippen
33. Elgin Baylor
34. John Havlicek
35. ??

Given the holidays are upon us, I'll leave this one open a little longer than usual. I know most of us are probably supposed to stay within our own little cohorts [and I hope most of you opt to do so], but I imagine most of you have something planned. So instead of ending at ~9pm EST on Christmas Eve, I leave this one an extra 19-20 hours [till around 4-5pm EST on Christmas Day].

I have no idea who the true front-runner is for this spot. Miller, Kidd, and Barry all seem to have the potential support; though Kawhi and Gervin are also players.

Happy holidays all. I hope this Christmas finds you and your families safe and well....

Spoiler:
Ainosterhaspie wrote:.

Ambrose wrote:.

Baski wrote:.

bidofo wrote:.

Blackmill wrote:.

Cavsfansince84 wrote:.

Clyde Frazier wrote:.

Doctor MJ wrote:.

DQuinn1575 wrote:.

Dr Positivity wrote:.

drza wrote:.

Dutchball97 wrote:.

Eddy_JukeZ wrote:.

eminence wrote:.

Franco wrote:.

Gregoire wrote:.

Hal14 wrote:.

HeartBreakKid wrote:.

Hornet Mania wrote:.

iggymcfrack wrote:.

Jaivl wrote:.

Joao Saraiva wrote:.

Joey Wheeler wrote:.

Jordan Syndrome wrote:.

LA Bird wrote:.

lebron3-14-3 wrote:.

limbo wrote:.

Magic Is Magic wrote:.

Matzer wrote:.

Moonbeam wrote:.

Odinn21 wrote:.

Owly wrote:.

O_6 wrote:.

PaulieWal wrote:.

penbeast0 wrote:.

PistolPeteJR wrote:.

RSCD3_ wrote:.

[quote=”sansterre”].[/quote]
Senior wrote:.

SeniorWalker wrote:.

SHAQ32 wrote:.

Texas Chuck wrote:.

Tim Lehrbach wrote:.

TrueLAfan wrote:.

Whopper_Sr wrote:.

ZeppelinPage wrote:.

2klegend wrote:.

70sFan wrote:.

876Stephen wrote:.

90sAllDecade wrote:.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,876
And1: 9,615
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#2 » by penbeast0 » Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:42 am

penbeast0 wrote:Best remaining big is probably Gilmore, Dwight Howard would be the main competition unless I'm forgetting someone. Pau Gasol? Maybe Robert Parish or Kevin McHale? I've heard Lanier's name come up but eye test, he was a somewhat lazy, passive defender and the stats (outside of outlier season 1974) don't indicate anything different to me . . . either the individual ones or the team defensive Drtg.


Gervin is the best scorer left. I will look at him v. Reggie Miller who was more efficient on lesser volume. His trouble is he brings almost nothing else (decent rebounding and good shotblocking for a wing but which didn't translate to good defense); of course, neither did Miller. George was much more highly rated while playing (ppg v. efficiency always tends to skew publicly toward PPG; usually way more than justified); Reggie had a much longer career. Barry is in their league on volume and better on passing but efficiency and his locker room presence put him a bit below these two for me.

At PG there is Jason Kidd who brings great defense, good (but in my opinion often greatly overrated) playmaking, and poor shooting through his prime, greatly improving in his old age as he tried to do less, took more 3's, and played less defense. Gary Payton gets you a lot more points but also without great efficiency, maybe better man defense but not the GOAT PG rebounding that was a bit of a game changer with Kidd and Kidd was the better playmaker. Isiah would be the 3rd guard in most people's mix, underrated tough defender, overrated scorer, good playmaker, I don't think he's up yet.

Trying to think who I am missing. Great defenders like Mutombo and Bobby Jones but Mutombo has bad hands, Jones is the Manu Ginobli of forwards with limited ability to stay out on the floor for his NBA career, same for Kawhi except Kawhi also seems to have locker room issues and his defense waned as his offense waxed. I would probably go for both Jones and Manu over Kawhi though I know Kawhi is already on people's radar. I'd rather have less minutes a game but a consistent rotation than someone who doesn't play a lot of the games though another playoff run could certainly swing my perception.

So, even though I am normally one of the people pushing defensive impact as being equal to (or for bigs greater than!) offensive impact, I find myself supporting 2 pure scorers 1st and 2nd. Both very efficient for their day, Reggie the more so. Both good playoff players, again Reggie steps up his game more, those are why he's even in the mix at all. But, in the end, their value was as scorers and Ice was just plain more impactful in that regard than Reggie.

1. George Gervin
2. Reggie Miller
3. Artis Gilmore


Between Barry and Kidd, I would go with Jason Kidd though I think it's too high for either.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,442
And1: 8,109
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#3 » by trex_8063 » Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:46 am

1st vote: Jason Kidd
The major critique(s) he sustains are the poor efficiency shooting and the lack of great offenses with him at the helm. otoh, I think he's arguably the greatest transition passer of all-time [I'll submit that one video below], and a solid creation passer in the half-court, too, who fairly consistently had some really good ORAPM's in his prime [frequently top 5-10 in the league, I think one even as high as 3rd].
Additionally he's a rare breed of PG who can actually kinda co-anchor elite defenses.
I'll point out that [in an era of already quite low league average ORtg/DRtg] he was a part of three consecutive elite defenses with rDRTG's of -5.0 [1st of 29], -5.5 [1st of 29], and -4.9 [4th of 29]. All three of these were achieved WITHOUT an elite rim-protector in the middle. For that matter, they followed that period up with a couple more very good ones (-3.0 and -3.8, respectively).

I don't want to give you the impression Kidd was definitively the anchor; they were very much "ensemble efforts".......but it's also hard to definitively peg any other ONE member of those Nets teams as MORE important to their defensive success than Kidd.

The '02 Nets displayed some pretty good 3pt defense---despite being one of the faster paced teams in the league, they allowed the 13th-fewest 3PA while also being 10th [of 29] in 3pt% allowed. And unlike, for example, recent Utah Jazz teams, they didn't achieve that by running guys off the line with confidence because of the rim protector they have behind them [because again: the best rim protectors were guys like Kenyon Martin and Todd MacCulloch]; this was simple stout defense by the perimeter core [of which Kidd played more minutes----handily---than anyone].
They managed this while also maintaining a pretty low opponent FTAr (10th of 29), which usually involves not allowing defensive breakdowns on the perimeter.
But their best defensive FF was opp TOV% (3rd in league)......and Kidd led the team in both steals and STL%.
They were also decent on the defensive glass, where Kidd was the team's 2nd-best defensive rebounder.
They other aspect they really excelled at [which I touched on a bit wrt 3pt defense] is opp eFG%, which again always felt like an ensemble effort with this team.

With the '03 team [their single-best defense], their 3pt defense was merely average; it was their 2pt defense that was outstanding [resulting in them being 4th in opp eFG%]. I think moving Jason Collins into a larger minute role helped [outstanding rotational defender, pnr defender], and they got 514 minutes from an aging Dikembe. But mostly an ensemble effort with few defensive weak spots in the rotation.
But again their BEST defensive FF was opp TOV% (and again Kidd leads in both steals and STL%).
And he's again one of their best defensive rebounders (they were 6th in DREB%).

The '04 squad shakes out similarly, with their best defensive FF being DREB% and opp TOV% (with Kidd again being one of their best defensive rebounders AND leading the team in steals and STL%).

His overall RAPM league rank during the heart of his prime:
'02: 5th
'03: 5th
'04: tied for 4th
'05: 6th
'06: tied for 17th
'07: tied for 17th

With mostly solid [often top 25ish] RAPM on either side of these years.......and ALWAYS while playing BIG minutes and missing very few games.
He was an integral part of a title team in '11 [in his 17th season], and still a solid contributor on a decent Knicks team in his 19th and final season, when his athleticism was just shot. The guy simply knew how to ball, though.

From my perspective, I don't think it can be definitively said that someone like John Havlicek was any better. Nor can one say Hondo had better longevity. Halvicek had a more "storied" career [which to some degree may just mean he was luckier].
I certainly think Kidd deserves traction in the same region of the list as players like Havlicek and Pippen.




And although he's already in, I'll re-post my brief comparison of Havlicek to Kidd from last thread.
I'll start by looking at them thru the lens of different "components" of the game of basketball, starting with scoring....

Havlicek scored at a rate of anywhere from 19.5 pts/100 possessions [in his rookie season; he otherwise was never lower than 21.4] to 26.4 pts/100 [averaging out around 23.5 or slightly under pts/100], on shooting efficiency that ranged anywhere from -3.8% rTS to +2.2 rTS (averaging out at about -0.7% rTS), with a career average of 36.6 mpg.

Kidd---in his first 16 seasons [to keep the same time-line as Havlicek's career]---averaged anywhere from 13.3 to 26.2 pts/100 (depending on the role he took, averaging out to 19.2 pts/100), on anywhere from -7.4% to +3.4% rTS, averaging out around -2.4% rTS, while averaging a nearly identical [marginally superior, if we're picking nits] 37.1 mpg in these years.

Their respective turnover economies look roughly comparable [based on limited info for Hondo, obviously]. So it's safe to say that Havlicek was the better scorer [relative to his professional peers], and significantly so [although still not a great one].


But otoh Kidd is the superior rebounder [and that's before entering into any consideration of "positional expectation"]: Kidd averaged 9.3 reb/100 in these years.......Havlicek's PEAK rebounding rate was during his rookie season averaging an estimated 9.15 reb/100 [despite there being more rebounds to get per possession at that time], and averaged somewhere around 7 reb/100 overall for his career.

I think Kidd is probably the better passer/playmaker, even in consideration of positional expectation.

And defensively, I'm not sure that Kidd isn't the bigger per possession impact defender [which again, is perhaps extra impressive] in his time.

And all of this while playing in a more competitive era, imo.


And then Kidd goes on to have THREE more value-added [at least tiny amounts] seasons after this period, including one year as the roughly 3rd/4th-best player on a title winning team.

Truthfully, it's ONLY out of consideration for Havlicek's more storied career, and I suppose a little for his playoff heroics and leadership intangibles that even have him in the same general vicinity as Kidd.


2nd vote: Artis Gilmore
Extraordinarily efficient moderate volume scorer who rebounded very well [if not always boxing out], while providing some hit or miss defensive impact (HUGE some of his early years in the ABA, fwiw), over the course of an ultra-durable 17-year career. As someone who values meaningful longevity, it's hard to not have him as a viable candidate here.


3rd vote: Gary Payton
Another guy I feel needs some traction at this stage. I'm again ahead of the pitch on this pick relative to all of you, so I may save for a future thread any big post about The Glove.

EDIT: Reggie and Drexler are right after for me.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,260
And1: 16,249
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#4 » by Dr Positivity » Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:58 am

Just making a case for Pierce again here.

Due to his style of play he is excellent longevity player imo. He is a starter for 17 years, he comes in immediately as a Celtic with 16 and 19ppg seasons, then he has about 12 prime years, followed by one more as a Celtic with 18ppg. His first two and last Celtics seasons are still 3 BPM+ years. Even his Nets and Wizards version he is a decent stretch PF on playoff teams. He has some highs in the playoffs including going toe to toe with Lebron and winning Finals MVP in 08, and is a player I would say, has balls. He showed he is a good fit with other stars. He is definitely a 2nd tier star but this stage with players like Miller and Kidd I think it's fair to consider him. I'll probably vote for Drexler over him but not sure about other wings.
Liberate The Zoomers
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,876
And1: 9,615
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#5 » by penbeast0 » Wed Dec 23, 2020 3:46 am

trex_8063 wrote:.
Is there any evidence of Kidd as this great transition passer? Any sign that any of Kidd's teams were unusually outstanding in transition? Highlight reels are fine but they aren't evidence and if so, he must have been usually bad in the halfcourt game because, as you said, his team offenses aren't very impressive.

Probably the GOAT rebounding point, quite possibly the GOAT defensive point, I don't buy that he's a Stockton/Nash/Magic type passer (ignoring the whole shooting issue) without some small smidgeon of evidence.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 14,607
And1: 11,191
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#6 » by Cavsfansince84 » Wed Dec 23, 2020 6:38 am

I think I might be taking a break from the project for a while. Even though I obviously disagree with some people's ballots(as we all do) I feel its in good hands.
Dutchball97
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,406
And1: 5,001
Joined: Mar 28, 2020
   

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#7 » by Dutchball97 » Wed Dec 23, 2020 7:38 am

1. Kawhi Leonard - At this point there isn't much more I can say. Incredible peak, better longevity than he gets credit for (especially looking at the post-season) and one of the last guys who gives you a strong chance at a ring with him as the first option.

2. Rick Barry - Another guy who was the clear best player on a title team. Due to him spending a significant portion of his prime in the early ABA I have him a bit lower than contemporaries like Frazier and Havlicek but Barry at his best is one of the top peaks left available and he still has plenty of strong seasons besides that.

3. Clyde Drexler - Miller and Gervin have been getting more traction but I'm higher on Drexler than both of them. Drexler has more elite years than Gervin quite easily and a higher peak than Miller as well imo. Kidd and Gilmore are also strong options, though but I'm comfortable with Drexler here.
DQuinn1575
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,945
And1: 708
Joined: Feb 20, 2014

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#8 » by DQuinn1575 » Wed Dec 23, 2020 6:47 pm

Happy Holidays to the people on this thread

The other 4 starters and 6th man on 1975 Warriors:

rookie - Keith Wilkes (PER 15.3/.097 WS/48)
Butch Beard - one-time all-star on 23 win Cleveland team. 4 NBA seasons over 24 mpg
Clifford Ray - solid center, never an all-star
Charles Johnson - 27 minutes per game, only year over 22 mpg
6th man - Derrek Dickey - played 23 minutes per game, only year over 20 mpg

Probably the worst starting group to ever win title; Wilkes as a rookie is second best player, Beard and Ray were adequate starters.
Rick Barry had maybe the best carry job ever taking this team to the title over Washington. Also kept it going as they had very good regular season in 1976.
This is not a one time thing, as he had success in talking Warriors to Finals and giving one of the greatest teams of all-time - 67 Sixers a battle, and had success in ABA. An excellent passer and long range shooter, who is maligned but at least average on defense, he is the last man standing who led a team to an NBA title.


George Gervin - as unstoppable scorer as the game as had. Obvious short-comings on all-around game; if this was scoring only he might be Top 10. Best guard in the league between Frazier and the eventual emergence of Magic.


Reggie Miller has placeholder for 3rd; will need to take a better look at the career of Jason Kidd to make sure I am not underrating him, but always feel good about efficient volume scorers.

1 Barry
2 Gervin
3 Miller
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 20,817
And1: 19,236
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#9 » by Hal14 » Wed Dec 23, 2020 6:54 pm

1. Isiah Thomas
2. Rick Barry
3. Kevin McHale

One thing that's interesting about Isiah is that during the 87-88 through 90-91 seasons (the years Isiah had the most team success) he somehow got significantly less votes in both MVP voting and all NBA teams, despite the fact that his stats across the board were just as good - if anything, maybe a slight dip but not enough to justify such a significant drop in MVP and all NBA votes - especially considering he was now having much greater team success - and considering he continued making the all star team every year. And typically when a guy has more team success, they get more MVP/all NBA votes..not less.

Below you'll find the year, followed by Isiah's finish in MVP voting, followed by which all NBA team he made

*Also keep in mind there was no all NBA 3rd team in 81-82

82 - 17th in MVP - didn't make all NBA team
83 - 16th in MVP - all NBA 2nd team
84 - 5th in MVP - all NBA 1st team
85 - 9th in MVP - all NBA 1st team
86 - 9th in MVP - all NBA 1st team
87 - 8th in MVP - all NBA 2nd team
88 - 12th in MVP - didn't make all NBA team
89 - 17th in MVP - didn't make all NBA team
90 - 13th in MVP - didn't make all NBA team
91 - 13th in MVP - didn't make all NBA team

My theory as to why he all of a sudden had such a big dip in MVP/all NBA votes despite much greater team success is because people truly started to hate the Pistons beginning with the 87 ECF finals, which was a grueling series between the Celtics and Pistons. In 87, the Celtics were a blue collar team that was very well liked, their players got lots of votes for awards, evidenced by Bird winning 3 straight MVPs in 84-86..and in 87, both Bird and McHale finished top 4 in MVP voting.

Then in the 87 ECF, this happened:



Following the 87 ECF, the Pistons became the most hated team in the league. Not only for brawling with the Celtics in the ECF, but also because of how physical and borderline dirty they played overall. The next year in 87-88 - the Pistons were officially established as a hated team. All Pistons players saw a big dip in MVP/all NBA votes - especially Isiah who was considered the ring leader of the Pistons. The other guy on the Pistons besides Isiah who was seen as the poster boy for the Bad Boys image was Laimbeer. If you look at Laimbeer and his all NBA selections and all star appearances before the 87-88. season and after, you'll notice the same discrepancy.

Isiah was top 10 in MVP voting 4 years in a row from 83-84 through 86-87. He made 1st or 2nd team all NBA five years in a row from 82-83 through 86-7. Then somehow magically, the votes he received plummeted from 87-8 through 90-91 despite the fact that he put up similar stats, was still an all star every year and had much greater team success. It's because of bad boy image. People didn't like him and they didn't like Laimbeer. Dumars (despite the fact that hew as on the hated Pistons team) was more of a nice guy, of anyone on those Pistons teams, he had the best image and was the least likely guy on the team to mix it up and get in someone's face, least likely Piston to throw a punch, etc. That's why a) he finished with the same ranking in MVP voting as Isiah in both 89 and 90 and b) Dumars made all NBA third team in 90 over Isiah despite the fact that Isiah was clearly the better player and was the heart and soul of the team, according to this article and many others:

https://exnba.com/articles-news/isiah-thomas-on-who-could-be-bad-boy-on-80s-pistons/

Isiah made all NBA 2nd team in 82-83, while finishing 16th in MVP voting. And that was BEFORE there was a significant bias against the Pistons. So I'm actually being conservative here by saying that he if we remove the bias against the Bad Boys Pistons and specifically Isiah and Laimbeer, then this is what Isiah would have achieved:

-All NBA team (either 1st or 2nd team) 9 years in a row
-Top 10 in MVP voting 5 years in a row

What player still left on the board can compete with that?

Still not convinced Isiah deserves consideration here? How about:

-12 time all-star (in a 13 year career)
-1 time NBA Finals MVP
-2 time NBA champion
-2 times was the best player on an NBA championship winning team (Isiah led the Pistons in minutes, points, assists and steals - in both the regular season and playoffs in both 88-89 and 89-90)
-Only player ever (other than Magic and Oscar) to average over 19 PPG and over 9 APG for his career
-Joined a Pistons team which was on the brink of extinction - there was talk about the team moving to a different city - or possibly shutting down entirely - they went 21-61 the year before Isiah joined the team. They improved their win total by a whopping 18 games in Isiah's rookie year. 2 years later they made the playoffs and 6 years after that they were champions.

Still not convinced? Perhaps you missed this piece of NBA history:



Isiah with 43 points in game 6 of the 88 NBA finals - against the Showtime Lakers who were in their dynasty. He scored 25 of those points in the 3rd quarter on a severely injured ankle. One of the most heroic performances of any NBA game, especially one in the NBA finals. If not for the phantom foul call on Laimbeer:
a) this would have been arguably the greatest performance in a NBA finals clinging game in history
b) would have been 3 titles in a row for the Pistons
c) Isiah would have been finals MVP in 88

Even Lakers coach Pat Riley calls it a phantom foul:

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2103545-pat-riley-admits-84-lakers-benefited-from-phantom-foul-vs-detroit-pistons

To anyone who says "oh Laimbeer got away with other fouls so he deserved to get called for that one"...no, that's BS because a) refs hated Laimbeer, if anything they were out to get him and are more likely to favor the Lakers with calls since the Lakers were showtime, they were the much more liked team and had a much better image than the Pistons and b) the Phantom Foul was called with 14 seconds left in the game - it was an elimination game in the NBA finals. You're comparing apples to oranges if you say Laimbeer got calls in the 2nd quarter of this game so it's ok that the phantom foul was called. Obviously a foul being called on a dude attempting a game winning shot with 14 seconds left - that call carries MUCH more weight and significance than a call in the 2nd quarter.

Also, someone posted in the other thread something like "oh, even if the foul wasn't called on Laimbeer, if Kareem misses that show there was a Lakers player in position for the offensive rebound and put-back. To that I say, no! Look at this video, pause it at the :41 mark because that is the exact moment this whistle blows for the foul. At that moment, neither team looks to be in better position for the rebound - if anything, the Pistons look to be in slightly better rebounding position if you pause it there. If you let the video keep going another second or 2 after the whistle then yes, the Lakers player under the basket is in better position to get a rebound but it was way after the whistle at that point so why would the Pistons keep going for the rebound?

And no, if you think that magical game vs the Lakers was a fluke and if you think that was the only iconic performance by Isiah, you're wrong:

https://theundefeated.com/features/pistons-isiah-thomas-dropped-16-points-in-94-seconds-1984-nba-playoffs-against-knicks/

The bigger the stage, the more pressure is on, the better Isiah delivers. Something you can't say about pretty much any player left on the board at this point.

Rick Barry - I actually have him slightly ahead of Pippen, who got voted in a few rounds ago. Pippen was a better defender but a) Barry was also a strong defender b) I think Barry's advantage as a scorer offsets the advantage Barry has as a defender c) Both are relatively equal I'd say in terms of rebounding and play making d) both guys were at times not really the best guy as a teammate e) Slightly better longevity for Barry and f) Barry had slightly higher peak with more years as a legit top 5 or 6 player in the world and g) not only won finals MVP (Pippen never did) but he led that 75 Warriors team to a title without a whole lot of help..one of the bigger carry jobs in history

Third spot I'm admittedly torn between McHale, Gilmore and Reed. Going with McHale for now but might change the order in future rounds.
1/11/24 The birth of a new Hal. From now on being less combative, avoiding confrontation - like Switzerland :)
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 14,607
And1: 11,191
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#10 » by Cavsfansince84 » Wed Dec 23, 2020 7:00 pm

Dr Positivity wrote:Just making a case for Pierce again here.

Due to his style of play he is excellent longevity player imo. He is a starter for 17 years, he comes in immediately as a Celtic with 16 and 19ppg seasons, then he has about 12 prime years, followed by one more as a Celtic with 18ppg. His first two and last Celtics seasons are still 3 BPM+ years. Even his Nets and Wizards version he is a decent stretch PF on playoff teams. He has some highs in the playoffs including going toe to toe with Lebron and winning Finals MVP in 08, and is a player I would say, has balls. He showed he is a good fit with other stars. He is definitely a 2nd tier star but this stage with players like Miller and Kidd I think it's fair to consider him. I'll probably vote for Drexler over him but not sure about other wings.


I agree on Pierce. Not that he necessarily should be the next guy voted in or anything but I think he's right there in that group with his ability to carry a team in both the rs and ps and long prime and very solid combination of size/scoring/playmaking and defense. Plus a guy a team can count on in the final minutes of a game to take those tough shots and often make them. I think he definitely got sort of underrated in the 01-07 period also because his teams weren't that great.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,876
And1: 9,615
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#11 » by penbeast0 » Wed Dec 23, 2020 8:47 pm

Hal14 wrote:1. Isiah Thomas
2. Rick Barry
3. Kevin McHale
...
Rick Barry - I actually have him slightly ahead of Pippen, who got voted in a few rounds ago. Pippen was a better defender but a) Barry was also a strong defender ....


I'm the one that made the phantom call comment about Laimbeer. It was humor, not analysis. :wink:

And what do you base the idea that Rick Barry cared about or tried to play defense that much? I remember him as one of those guys who rested on that end to focus on offense.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,599
And1: 24,914
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#12 » by 70sFan » Wed Dec 23, 2020 8:56 pm

penbeast0 wrote:
Hal14 wrote:1. Isiah Thomas
2. Rick Barry
3. Kevin McHale
...
Rick Barry - I actually have him slightly ahead of Pippen, who got voted in a few rounds ago. Pippen was a better defender but a) Barry was also a strong defender ....


I'm the one that made the phantom call comment about Laimbeer. It was humor, not analysis. :wink:

And what do you base the idea that Rick Barry cared about or tried to play defense that much? I remember him as one of those guys who rested on that end to focus on offense.

I have seen quite a few Barry games and I've never seen him resting on defense. Not saying that he was some kind of all-timer on that end (he wasn't, let's be honest) but he put up good effort most of the time and hustled a lot on that end. He reminds me quicker and smaller Larry Bird on that end.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,876
And1: 9,615
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#13 » by penbeast0 » Wed Dec 23, 2020 9:02 pm

Of course I think Bird was a weak defender (at least at the 3) as well. Both got burned way too often, gave shooters a lot of space, and got caught ball watching too much. For Bird, Dantley making him look like a Shaqtin the Fool episode in the ECF v. Detroit burned that indelibly into my head (maybe too much since as a PF the issues he showed would have been greatly mitigated). I don't have the equivalent tape on Barry but he never impressed me defensively except with an occasional steal when I watched him.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,192
And1: 26,047
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#14 » by Clyde Frazier » Wed Dec 23, 2020 11:21 pm

Vote 1 - Rick Barry
Vote 2 - Clyde Drexler
Vote 3 - Artis Gilmore

Barry's 75 title run is just really impressive culminating in a sweep of the 60 win #1 ranked SRS bullets. Going up against Unseld, Hayes, Chenier and Porter was a very formidable opponent. He put up 29.5 PPG, 4 RPG, 5 APG, 3.5 SPG, .8 BPG on 44.4% FG and 93.8% FT (8 FTAs per game) in the series.

It's tough to parse out what he did in the ABA as it was in its early years and clearly weaker. That said he really did dominate the competition. In 68-69 for the oakland oaks he had a crazy +11.4 rTS, albeit in 35 games. He did follow that up with a +7.6 rTS in 69-70 on a relatively high volume 27.7 PPG on 58.2% TS.

Speaking of efficency it's where I give him the edge over havlicek, with havlicek even proving to be inefficient for his era. I do think there's something to attributing that partially to the celtics' style of play. That said, havlicek's versatility edge over barry may be overstated as I'd consider barry more versatile than given credit for, especially as a playmaker. Longevity is just so so by my standards, but i've already voted in guys with similar longevity. I think he's accomplished enough overall for this range.
User avatar
Joao Saraiva
RealGM
Posts: 13,327
And1: 6,137
Joined: Feb 09, 2011
   

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#15 » by Joao Saraiva » Thu Dec 24, 2020 12:28 am

Votes
1. Kawih Leonard
2. Rick Barry
3. Clyde Drexler


I'm back guys! Hope I don't miss more of this project. With that said... It's Kawih time for me.

I get the lack of longevity putting him a few spots down. That's what made me go Harden instead of Kawih a few threads ago.
I get that he had an ideal situation with the Spurs, and had some luck against GSW because a ton of guys got injured.
I also get that he was a part of the game 7 choke against Denver but...

Kawih is a fantastic scorer. His shooting is amazing and he's a real weapon. Of course he had a bad G7... but I'm not even counting that series as a big hit on his legacy. He played really well for 6 games.

Did he have an ideal situation with the Spurs? Yes. But his wing defense was a part of that, and his shooting too.
Did he have luck with Toronto? Yes, absolutely. But many stars have had luck and he had to play who he had to play. His playoff run is still fantastic.

He has been a top player in the league for some years, he is a proven legit #1 option on offense and one of the best ever on defense wing wise. That's hard to pass on. I guess his playmaking is at least a bit suspicious, but how hard is it to find a playmker to play besides him? He's the type of guy who can coexist with a Rondo type of guard, or a Rubio type of guard and thrive under those circumstances.

He brings great scoring, spacing, defense and rebounding. Sure he'll miss some games, but the ceilling of any team with Kawih is definitely higher.

I vote for him over Barry because of consistecny, and over Clyde because I think Kawih gets the better peak, prime and he's a better fit under more circumstances. At what he is really good, he is really good. Clyde is more versatile, but I don't see that versatility as something that should put him over Kawih.

I really am thinking aobut Billups for the next spots... I really love that guy's game. It's something else. I also want to vote for Adrian Dantley in the top 50. I think the Pistons winning in 89 gave him a reputation that is not true at all, and that was the biggest legacy hit I can ever think on a great player for not being a part of a ring team.
“These guys have been criticized the last few years for not getting to where we’re going, but I’ve always said that the most important thing in sports is to keep trying. Let this be an example of what it means to say it’s never over.” - Jerry Sloan
User avatar
Odinn21
Analyst
Posts: 3,514
And1: 2,940
Joined: May 19, 2019
 

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#16 » by Odinn21 » Thu Dec 24, 2020 1:13 am

35. Rick Barry
My main criteria are peak, prime level and duration, overall longevity. And I don't think any of the remaining names check those boxes as well as Barry. This is a pretty clear pick for me.

36. Jason Kidd
Next group of players to consider for me are; Kidd, Drexler, Miller, Payton, Gilmore, Gervin, Zeke.
I guess I'll go with Kidd for this spot because Kidd's peak seasons were still great. Many seem to look at the fact that the East was weak but overlook the fact that the Nets weren't great to begin with. There's always a ratio between the help a player gets and the competition his team faces. Kidd did great.
One thing about Kidd and his impact, in 2004 Kidd was playing with one good leg and Martin wasn't fully healthy and they took the Pistons to a game 7. They gave the Pistons the hell despite being so broken. Surely, Martin and Jefferson improved massively in the mean time. But if Kidd's success was only related to a weak conference, they wouldn't do that well against probably the best (non Russell led) defensive team ever with those issues.
Among those names, Kidd is coming ahead for me.

37. George Gervin
I'm more of a peak/prime guy. I'd take 5-7 seasons with higher chance of winning than 9-10 season with lower chance of winning. This could be challenged by looking at results Drexler's Blazers and Miller's Pacers had but Gervin didn't get to play in such deep and well constructed rosters and good coaches. On individual level, Gervin was the better player and his prime lasted long enough for me.
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,599
And1: 24,914
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#17 » by 70sFan » Thu Dec 24, 2020 1:31 am

1. Artis Gilmore career review

I think it's the right time to consider Artis Gilmore - he's good mention for both longevity and peak guys.

He played 1329 games in his career and only his last season was meaningless - even as an 37 years old man he posted healthy 17/9/2 in 34 mpg, along with 17 PER, 66 TS% and .143 WS/48. He made also an all-star team.

Before Gilmore, Kentucky led by Dampier and Issel were 44-40 team with good offense and poor defense. Rookie Gilmore was drafted and 1972 Colonels became 68-16 team with -4.4 defense (giant +7 leap). He posted 24/18/3/5 on 62 TS% as a rookie and won the MVP award.

They lost in playoffs against Rick Barry led NY Nets team in 6 games, but Gilmore played fantastic. He posted 22/18/4 on 61 TS% and shut down Billy Paultz to 13 ppg on 45 TS%, but Issel shot 41% from the field (48 TS%) and they lost in a close series. Gilmore posted 24/18 on 80 TS% in deciding game by the way.

I don't have any rookie Gilmore game, but you can see him here battling with Chamberlain:



As for peak, he led dominant Colonels team (58 wins, -6.4 defense) to the title in 1975 while posting 24/18/3 on 60 TS% in playoffs. It was one of the best individual seasons in NBA history:



Then his team lost Issel and he put up 24/15/2 on 65 TS% in playoffs, including narrow 7 games loss against much better Nuggets team.




If you don't value ABA highly, then keep in mind that Gilmore wasn't bad in NBA at all. In his first season, he had to adjust to the NBA: in the first 16 games Bulls went 2-14 and Gilmore averaged only 17/13 on 52 TS%. After this very rough start, Bulls went 42-24 (52 wins pace, which would be 2nd in the league) in remaining games. This includes the second part of the season when Bulls went 27-14 (54 wins pace, the best in the league) when Gilmore averaged 21/14/3 on 60 TS% in only 37 mpg. He was MVP candidate in that season, but he wasn't recognised as such because of his and Bulls poor start. Then he went h2h against peak Bill Walton and played on even terms despite having significantly weaker supporting cast:



In next two years, Gilmore averaged 23/13/3/2 on 61 TS% but his team got worse and worse. The last time he was the leader of strong team was in 1981 when similar situation to 1977 happened - Bulls had slow start with 10-19 record. They finished the season with 35-18 record (54 wins pace) and beating very solid Knicks team in playoffs. Then they got swept in playoffs by future champions, but I don't think you can have it against Gilmore. Gilmore averaged 18/10/2 on 70 TS% in this season and 18/11/2 on 64 TS% in playoffs.



The last highlight of Gilmore's postseason play was his WCF series against Kareem in 1983 when he held his own against Jabbar with 20/14/2/3 on 62 TS% series. Spurs lost a close series in 6 games, but Gilmore got better and better, outplaying Jabbar in last two games:



Gilmore is legitimate candidate at this point, as I don't think he's clearly worse player than Ewing and his longevity is even better.

2. Prime Gilmore defensive analysis

I finally found some time to break down the first ABA game:


Good effort and quick switch, he also contested jumpshot.


Bad boxout, allowing for offensive rebound.


Despite being out of position, Gilmore still contested shot nicely. It shows how giantic he truly was.


Another good P&R defense, look how quick he was on his feet and how low he went despite being true 7 footer. Then he made a nice rotation and got a hard contest, but a foul was called.


This time Gilmore didn't contest the shot, but bodied up the shooter nicely. Artis wasn't easy to move inside.


Gilmore didn't chase down jump shooters, but he made a nice contest here - reminds me of how Duncan usually defended decent shooters.


Poor communication, although I wouldn't give Gilmore a lot of blame here - it wasn't his role to switch and chase down shooters in such situations.


Gilmore had 3 fouls in the first half, so Pacers tried to turn him into foul trouble at the beginning of the second half. Let's just say that it's not easy to shoot around A-Train - here he blocks Elmore's shot like he was a child.


Elmore tries again and I don't know what he was thinking at this point, another easy block for Artis. Great, patient man defense.


Elmore tried harder and he failed harder...


Gilmore shows decent footspeed and draws a charge. I know it looks odd, but back then charges were called different and Gilmore did smart thing here (yes, that's a flop)


The foul was called before the shot, but Gilmore made another nice contest at the rim


Gilmore was very patient under the rim, he didn't go for fakes and stayed on his feet. He knew he had physical advantage and made another block.


Gilmore gave a bit too much space here and he didn't body his man, but he also contested the shot very well. I will call it as neutral play, he should have done better before the shot but the contest was good and it wasn't a good shot anyway.


This is an all-time great level of rim protection - Gilmore intimidated Pacers player who passed the ball to open center who tried to dunk on Artis, but Gilmore recovered quickly and blocked the dunk. What a wall Gilmore was under the rim!


Great post defense, Pacers bigs shouldn't have even tried to score on him.


First bad gamble I've recorded in this game. It's a poor block attempt that was completely unnecessary and he left his man wide open


Fantastic transition defense, the foul was called but I'd love to see better angle. To me it looks like a good play


This is the type of play that wasn't unusual for Artis - sometimes he was too late and got caught under the rim. These plays happened more often when he was old, in this game it was rare though. Great dunk by the way!

Conclusions:

The goods:

- he was a mountain inside, you can't shoot over him, unreal combination of length and shooting ability,
- excellent post defender, used his length nicely,
- very patient under the rim, rarely went up for pump fakes,
- good lateral quickness for his size and willingness to go low on his legs,
- very good defensive rebounder,
- hard to push around.

The bads:

- didn't have the awareness of the best defenders ever, sometimes got too slow to spots,
- sometimes not physical enough as a post defender, relied more on length that strength,
- good feet for his size, but he was still a giant and could be caught in awkward positions,
- sometimes relied too much on his athleticism on defensive boards.

Overall, it was excellent defensive game from Artis and most of my criticism is relative to the best of the best like Hakeem, Russell or Walton.
User avatar
Magic Is Magic
Senior
Posts: 512
And1: 505
Joined: Mar 05, 2019
     

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#18 » by Magic Is Magic » Thu Dec 24, 2020 2:47 am

Placing my Vote for #35 ranking


1. Jason Kidd
2. Kawhi Leonard
3. Bob Cousy




1. Jason Kidd: #2 all time in regular season assists and #4 all time in playoff assists. #2 all time in regular season steals and #7 all time in playoff steals. Amazing resume and career work of art right there alone. Very Stocktonesque in this regard. He was top 3 in assists for 8x seasons and was top 5 13x total. He never was an MVP winner but he did get top 5 in MVP voting two times. Ultimately his ability to do it all (pass, score, rebound, defend) aka rack up those triple doubles at a high level with great longevity is why it's hard to put many above him at this point. His individual career achievements are 100% above what anyone else left has to compare against. #2 in regular season assists and steals all time is huge just by itself, not to mention his playoff standings in both categories as well.

2. Kawhi would be a lot higher if he didn't "load manage" and had more longevity. Only time will tell if this changes but I doubt it. However, he has done some extraordinary things such as winning back-to-back DPOY awards and 2x FMVP. If I recall correctly only Kawhi and Hakeem have ever achieved such a feat (B2B DPOY winner and winner of 2x FMVP). His 2019 run was also very impressive: 31/9/4 on splits of 49/38/88 (very close to entire 50-40-90 run on over 30 ppg en route to a FMVP. Who here left to rank has done anything close to a Finals run on 31/9/4 with near 50-40-90 splits?

If you value greatness on both ends of the ball then it would be hard to put many guys left ahead of Kawhi. He is elite on both ends, but again, his lack of longevity is hurting his resume along with him needing at least one regular season MVP or Scoring Title. Nearly all of the greats have them but him but I guess if we're voting in Ewing than peak doesn't matter that much so Kawhi should definitely be voted in.

3. Bob Cousy: What didn't this guy do? 6x Champion, 8x Assist Leader, 13x All Star, 1x MVP, and 10x 1st team All NBA. I see people are putting Baylor over Cousy and I'm not mad at it, Cousy did have the better team after all. But it's hard to argue against 6 rings to Baylor's zero. 6 vs 0. And of course Cousy's MVP which Baylor never won. Cousy was also top 3 in point scored for a total of 4x just like Baylor.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,876
And1: 9,615
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#19 » by penbeast0 » Thu Dec 24, 2020 1:22 pm

With all due respect, Cousy was actually a negative player over the course of those 6 rings as he consistently racked up miserable playoff performances (his playoffs pre-Russell were actually good despite their lack of results). He was rescued by Russell, Frank Ramsey (who was a playoff beast) and other. Cousy pre-Russell (52-56 and the 1st half of 57) was one of the great offensive players in the 50s and his passing was still producing assists at a rate above anyone else before Oscar. He probably deserves a top 100 spot but giving him a boost over anyone for those rings is highly questionable seeing as how he shot a TS% of around .410 over the course of those 5 rings while his team shot a full 100 points higher. He was Trae Young with Ricky Rubio's shooting.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
trex_8063
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 12,442
And1: 8,109
Joined: Feb 24, 2013
     

Re: RealGM 2020 Top 100 Project: #35 

Post#20 » by trex_8063 » Thu Dec 24, 2020 5:42 pm

Merry Christmas Eve!

penbeast0 wrote:
trex_8063 wrote:.
Is there any evidence of Kidd as this great transition passer? Any sign that any of Kidd's teams were unusually outstanding in transition? Highlight reels are fine but they aren't evidence and if so, he must have been usually bad in the halfcourt game because, as you said, his team offenses aren't very impressive.

Probably the GOAT rebounding point, quite possibly the GOAT defensive point, I don't buy that he's a Stockton/Nash/Magic type passer (ignoring the whole shooting issue) without some small smidgeon of evidence.


Well firstly, I don't see that I said he was a "Stockton/Nash/Magic type passer". I said he was "arguably the greatest transition passer of all-time", and a "solid creation passer in the half-court". Frankly, if he was, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Because anyone who played 19 durable seasons while being a Nash/Stockton/Magic tier facilitator AND the arguable GOAT defensive and rebounding PG would have been voted in AT LEAST 3-5 places ago, even with the poor shooting efficiency.


Even if I'm right and he is the GOAT(ish) transition passer, that doesn't necessarily put him in the same tier as Magic/Nash types, because transition plays only account for what?......maybe one out of every 6-8 possessions for even the most fast-breaky of teams? And only about half that for the least fast-breaky of teams.
The rest of the time it's the half-court [where I labelled him merely "solid"].

Secondly, I think I provided at least "some small smidgeon of evidence". I realize highlight videos often aren't the best material evidence, though this wasn't a mere top 10 passes, or highlights from a single great game. It was a [not totally insubstantial] FORTY-FIVE plays, spread from all stages of his career; and it was sort of telling to me that the majority of the so-named "Top 45 Assists" of the entire career of the guy who is 2nd all-time in career assists were transition assists.

Not that my word or eye-test is necessarily "evidence", but this was sort of consistent with my memory of Kidd [particularly younger Kidd]; I thought he was a bit of a wizard in transition.

As to other TEAM-based evidence you're looking for, that can be trickier to find and/or correlate. No matter how good a transition passer you are, you need guys who can run and finish well in transition to make an elite transition game. ALSO you need the defense plays that trigger transition opportunities: steals, blocks, or occasionally more simple defensive stops involving a missed shot and a defensive rebound. Which although Kidd's teams were often ranked well in defensive rebounding and steals [in no small part due to Kidd himself], he almost never played alongside a notable shot-blocker.

But anyway, I found some data going back to '04 [at least partial season for '04] and later on teamrankings.com, which I'll combine with some info off of bbref....

'04: the Nets were 3rd (of 29) in fast-break ppg, despite being on 18th in pace, 14th in drpg, 8th in spg, and 27th in bpg
'05: the Nets were 20th (of 30) in fast-break ppg, despite being 21st in pace, 22nd in drpg, 28th in bpg, (though were 10th in spg).
'06: the Nets 8th in fast-break ppg, despite being 18th in pace, 8th in drpg, 20th in spg, and 27th in bpg.
'07: the Nets were 9th in fast-break ppg, despite being 16th in pace, 30th in spg, 27th in bpg, (though were 8th in drpg)
'08 (Kidd plays a little over half the year with Nets before moving to Dallas): the Nets were 11th in fast-break ppg, despite being 16th in pace, 13th in drpg, 24th in spg, and 16th in bpg.

After his departure, the Nets would fall to 17th in fast-break points in '09, 20th in '10, and 26th in '11.

So all of ^^^this [combined with prior "evidence"] seems suggestive regarding his transition passing, imo.


As to overall offenses, I'll note many of these teams [particularly in New Jersey] were constructed with defense in mind. They were for the most part mediocre to poor at one or both [usually both] of FT-shooting and 3pt shooting, and except for '02 and '03, they were exclusively terrible on the offensive glass--->this latter I suspect was by design [prioritizing transition defense over crashing the boards], and part of why they were elite defensively (while simultaneously contributing to poor ORtg's). Perhaps non-coincidentally, '02 and '03 were the years their offense was OK.

And take a look at the Nets in '01, you note they were the 24th-rated -3.0 rORTG with Stephon Marbury running the show.
The next year, out go Marbury and young Stephen Jackson, in come Jason Kidd, Kerry Kittles, and a rookie Richard Jefferson; otherwise mostly the same cast......they still weren't good [-0.5 rORTG], but it's a sharp improvement over what they'd been in '01. Would have one season >0 at +0.2 rORTG in '03, before tanking a bit after that.

Prior to Vince Carter arriving [which surprisingly didn't translate to much lift], they really didn't have any elite-level offensive talents, though. Richard Jefferson was a nice young talent, but not quite a "star-level" talent. Kenyon Martin was awfully raw offensively early on in his career [very turnover prone early, and pretty consistently mediocre shooting efficiency]. Kerry Kittles [in NJ for '02-'04 only] was a decent all-around player, but nothing real special on offense: could give you 13-14 ppg on average efficiency and 2-3 apg [though did take VERY good care of the ball]. After that??.......Lucius Harris was an OK spare guard on offense, but he was aging out thru the early 00's. A slightly aging Rodney Rodgers was brought in for a couple years, I think to provide some offense off the bench, but he didn't mesh well [or shoot well] in NJ. Most of the rest of the cast was very defense-oriented: Jason Collins, Nenad Krstic, Aaron Williams.
And I'll again make note of his more than capable ORAPM's throughout his career.

Interestingly, I note that in Kidd's final season in NY, the Knicks had the best offense in franchise history, at +5.2 rORTG. Obviously this offense wasn't built around Kidd by a long shot; but he was the primary starting PG for this team, averaging about 27 mpg. The Knicks the season before his arrival had been a -0.2 rORTG [though +3.6 the year before that], with much of the same cast (Melo, Amar'e, Tyson Chandler, few other smaller minute guys).
The big changes in '13 [relative to '12] was they obtained Raymond Felton and the ancient Jason Kidd, and JR Smith was healthy in '13 [though Stoudemire was in further decline and banged up]......otherwise much the same cast. But they jumped to that +5.2 mark. Kidd retires, and it's a lot of the same cast in '14, with rookie Tim Hardaway Jr. replacing most of Kidd's minutes, and they fell to +1.6 rORTG.
"The fact that a proposition is absurd has never hindered those who wish to believe it." -Edward Rutherfurd
"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire

Return to Player Comparisons