bwgood77 wrote:Bogyo wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Well, I guess you can say should be a win, but the Kings win was more impressive beating the Mavs..I wouldn't underestimate any team right now.
Spurs looked really good too as well as the Pelicans.
C'mon, we are better than the Kings from 1 through 15. Facts. Sure, they can beat anybody on any given night, but that is true to all of the NBA. We'll have twice as much wins as they will when the season ends. We should win this, and we should win this without big problems.
Spurs will trade DeRozan or Alridge before the deadline. Pels might be goodish, but I will never ever-ever trust Zion's ankles, knees, and back. He will not have a 10 year career in the league - sadly.
Well their first win was far more impressive than ours. Fox played better than Paul, Hield better than Booker. Holmes and Bagley a combined better than Crowder and Ayton combined.
Barnes even nearly or maybe as good as Bridges, with 21, 9, 5 assists and 2 steals.
All this against a better team than our opponent who was missing their second best player and was also on the road in high altitude.
They have a decent bench with Haliburton, Whiteside, Bjelica and Joseph.
Sure we are better if our players play well, but that remains to be seen outside of a couple players.
I mean, considering the Suns turnover issues, foul trouble and CP3 and Crowder playing below expectations, I think our win is plenty impressive. Maybe the bubble has changed me, but to me the result was never really in too much doubt. We never got out to a huge lead (refs made sure of that) but we were steady and took the punches well, and had a resilient and professional performance.
Frankly, it inspired a ton of confidence that if Ayton, CP3 and Book all are off for whatever reason, we've got more than enough talent to compete with most teams on any given night. 2-4 seasons ago, we'd be starting Payne, Book, Johnson, Kaminsky and Smith and hoping to win 25 games, now? Our bench unit might have more talent than a few teams starting units.