zaz102 wrote:Sorry, but I have to ask...
Fultz or Tobias?
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Fultz. Just wait, he’s gonna be better than Tatum. If only he didn’t have that bizarre shooting injury, he’d already be there.
Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, Foshan, Sixerscan, sixers hoops
zaz102 wrote:Sorry, but I have to ask...
Fultz or Tobias?
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
76ciology wrote:zaz102 wrote:Sorry, but I have to ask...
Fultz or Tobias?
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Fultz. Just wait, he’s gonna be better than Tatum. If only he didn’t have that bizarre shooting injury, he’d already be there.
76ciology wrote:Great turn around by the Cavs. Sexton and Garland looks good. Drummond was a good value acquisition.

Kolkmania wrote:76ciology wrote:Great turn around by the Cavs. Sexton and Garland looks good. Drummond was a good value acquisition.
Blake shooting 16(!!) threes and making 8(!!!!) is something.
76ciology wrote:zaz102 wrote:Sorry, but I have to ask...
Fultz or Tobias?
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Fultz. Just wait, he’s gonna be better than Tatum. If only he didn’t have that bizarre shooting injury, he’d already be there.
Eyeamok wrote:76ciology wrote:zaz102 wrote:Sorry, but I have to ask...
Fultz or Tobias?
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Fultz. Just wait, he’s gonna be better than Tatum. If only he didn’t have that bizarre shooting injury, he’d already be there.
I know you are/were high on Okafor too.
IMO watching Fultz play he, is at his best in low pressure situations/low pressure teams. Tatum has played well in big games/playoffs and for the Celtics where they are all about winning. So when you compare the two raw stats alone are not enough. Who will rise or wilt when it counts the most? I would not bet on Fultz.
Kolkmania wrote:76ciology wrote:Great turn around by the Cavs. Sexton and Garland looks good. Drummond was a good value acquisition.
Blake shooting 16(!!) threes and making 8(!!!!) is something.