ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Five)

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,821
And1: 2,660
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1341 » by younggunsmn » Sat Dec 26, 2020 4:09 pm

Points for creativity shrink, but I would need at least 3 first round picks attached to take that tobias harris contract, and I don't think philly is giving nearly enough or Houston is getting enough. If they trade Harden, I foresee PJ Tucker headed to a contender for a late 1st round pick.
Slim Tubby
Veteran
Posts: 2,926
And1: 2,545
Joined: Jun 03, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1342 » by Slim Tubby » Sat Dec 26, 2020 5:01 pm

Dual wrote:
Domejandro wrote:With Juan Hernangómez, Ed Davis, and Jake Layman, the Minnesota Timberwolves have $15.26MM in salary matching at the trade deadline ($8.76MM without Hernangómez that can be traded before the trade deadline). There are a multitude of avenues the team can explore to fill the massive hole at Power-Forward.

If a James Harden trade goes down, there is no question in my mind that Minnesota will get involved with a PJ Tucker team, if the team has Playoff aspirations.

PJ Tucker would be a huge mistake if something good is given in exchange tbh. In few months he turns 36 years old and he wasn't good last season. Also we will still lacking height.

This exactly how I feel about Tucker. Would he be a good fit for the current roster? Absolutely...but I’m not sending a player like Culver or Okogie to HOU for a guy that has no future there post Harden.

Now if HOU would accept Juancho or Layman, get it done.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,513
And1: 2,895
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1343 » by Neeva » Sun Dec 27, 2020 4:46 am

Ok we could be for real so lets unload Juancho and Layman and get a real forward. Who can the wolves get for Mcdaniels, Bolmaro, Nowell.
Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 8,333
And1: 3,085
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1344 » by Wolveswin » Sun Dec 27, 2020 5:08 am

Neeva wrote:Ok we could be for real so lets unload Juancho and Layman and get a real forward. Who can the wolves get for Mcdaniels, Bolmaro, Nowell.

Ham Sandwich???
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,447
And1: 19,495
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1345 » by shrink » Sun Dec 27, 2020 5:09 am

Neeva wrote:Ok we could be for real so lets unload Juancho and Layman and get a real forward. Who can the wolves get for Mcdaniels, Bolmaro, Nowell.

I know people are down on PJ Tucker because of his age, and I agree he would not be the final PF for this team. However, his game fits really well, and he would allow the rest of the team to play their systems correctly, preparing for when we eventually do find the right PF.

And I wouldn’t mind the wins in the meantime. That’s something else PJ can teach the young Wolves.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,513
And1: 2,895
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1346 » by Neeva » Sun Dec 27, 2020 5:10 am

Ham Sandwich would be better than Jaun Sandwich that is for sure..
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,513
And1: 2,895
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1347 » by Neeva » Sun Dec 27, 2020 5:16 am

shrink wrote:
Neeva wrote:Ok we could be for real so lets unload Juancho and Layman and get a real forward. Who can the wolves get for Mcdaniels, Bolmaro, Nowell.

I know people are down on PJ Tucker because of his age, and I agree he would not be the final PF for this team. However, his game fits really well, and he would allow the rest of the team to play their systems correctly, preparing for when we eventually do find the right PF.

And I wouldn’t mind the wins in the meantime. That’s something else PJ can teach the young Wolves.


I would not offer a first round pick (or Mcdaniels or Bolmaro). My offer for an old player that might be over the hill like Tucker is Layman, Juan, nowell and salary filler(Davis)
Then bring in RHJ.
old school 34
Senior
Posts: 645
And1: 240
Joined: Jun 14, 2018
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1348 » by old school 34 » Sun Dec 27, 2020 8:48 am

shrink wrote:
Neeva wrote:Ok we could be for real so lets unload Juancho and Layman and get a real forward. Who can the wolves get for Mcdaniels, Bolmaro, Nowell.

I know people are down on PJ Tucker because of his age, and I agree he would not be the final PF for this team. However, his game fits really well, and he would allow the rest of the team to play their systems correctly, preparing for when we eventually do find the right PF.

And I wouldn’t mind the wins in the meantime. That’s something else PJ can teach the young Wolves.
I agree on this...would I prefer a younger version sure...but if he's what I can get sooner than later without a crazy overpay...sign me up. Guy went from guarding Nurkic tonight to having Dame come crunch time.

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,496
And1: 30,915
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1349 » by Domejandro » Sun Dec 27, 2020 11:35 am

old school 34 wrote:
shrink wrote:
Neeva wrote:Ok we could be for real so lets unload Juancho and Layman and get a real forward. Who can the wolves get for Mcdaniels, Bolmaro, Nowell.

I know people are down on PJ Tucker because of his age, and I agree he would not be the final PF for this team. However, his game fits really well, and he would allow the rest of the team to play their systems correctly, preparing for when we eventually do find the right PF.

And I wouldn’t mind the wins in the meantime. That’s something else PJ can teach the young Wolves.
I agree on this...would I prefer a younger version sure...but if he's what I can get sooner than later without a crazy overpay...sign me up. Guy went from guarding Nurkic tonight to having Dame come crunch time.

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app

I would offer Ed Davis, Jaylen Nowell, and two seconds for PJ Tucker. I doubt Houston would consider it until AFTER a James Harden trade, though, which makes it unlikely.

Sometimes it is worth investing in stop-gap players, to facilitate the development of your stars.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,530
And1: 4,992
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1350 » by theGreatRC » Sun Dec 27, 2020 11:53 am

Domejandro wrote:
old school 34 wrote:
shrink wrote:I know people are down on PJ Tucker because of his age, and I agree he would not be the final PF for this team. However, his game fits really well, and he would allow the rest of the team to play their systems correctly, preparing for when we eventually do find the right PF.

And I wouldn’t mind the wins in the meantime. That’s something else PJ can teach the young Wolves.
I agree on this...would I prefer a younger version sure...but if he's what I can get sooner than later without a crazy overpay...sign me up. Guy went from guarding Nurkic tonight to having Dame come crunch time.

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app

I would offer Ed Davis, Jaylen Nowell, and two seconds for PJ Tucker. I doubt Houston would consider it until AFTER a James Harden trade, though, which makes it unlikely.

Sometimes it is worth investing in stop-gap players, to facilitate the development of your stars.


That's basically all i'd do as well.

Before pre season..I would've traded Culver for anything...now i'm being irrational and think he's just under KAT/Edwards in terms of "Who I wouldn't trade"
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
User avatar
King Malta
Starter
Posts: 2,328
And1: 1,554
Joined: Jun 24, 2013
Location: The Lottery
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1351 » by King Malta » Sun Dec 27, 2020 12:07 pm

theGreatRC wrote:
Domejandro wrote:
old school 34 wrote:I agree on this...would I prefer a younger version sure...but if he's what I can get sooner than later without a crazy overpay...sign me up. Guy went from guarding Nurkic tonight to having Dame come crunch time.

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app

I would offer Ed Davis, Jaylen Nowell, and two seconds for PJ Tucker. I doubt Houston would consider it until AFTER a James Harden trade, though, which makes it unlikely.

Sometimes it is worth investing in stop-gap players, to facilitate the development of your stars.


That's basically all i'd do as well.

Before pre season..I would've traded Culver for anything...now i'm being irrational and think he's just under KAT/Edwards in terms of "Who I wouldn't trade"


Don't think you're being irrational at all tbh. Effective two way wing players are worth their weight in gold in this league and Culver's beginning to show signs that he could potentially be one. I'd be handing on to him unless we got an offer that we'd be stupid to refuse.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,513
And1: 2,895
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1352 » by Neeva » Sun Dec 27, 2020 3:39 pm

Wolves have two, culver and Edwards.
User avatar
Dual
Veteran
Posts: 2,682
And1: 1,494
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1353 » by Dual » Sun Dec 27, 2020 3:47 pm

The guys I'm willing to trade:
Ed Davis
Vanderbilt
Hagans
Layman
Juancho
jscott
Analyst
Posts: 3,072
And1: 1,363
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1354 » by jscott » Sun Dec 27, 2020 4:01 pm

Dual wrote:The guys I'm willing to trade:
Ed Davis
Vanderbilt
Hagans
Layman
Juancho

I agree but I’d also add Okogie to the list cause I think Culver and Edwards deserve more minutes.
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,302
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1355 » by thinktank » Sun Dec 27, 2020 4:25 pm

Put me in the other camp.

Yes, Juancho is soft and we should bring RHJ back, but...

No need to trade Okogie or other assets just to “check a box”, as Rosas says.

Keep the team rebounding going. I feel like it motivates and engages the team. A lot of guys are flying around on D and to rebound. I like it.

Use Ed Davis if you need size.

Let’s keep rolling.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,513
And1: 2,895
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1356 » by Neeva » Sun Dec 27, 2020 4:25 pm

I actually wanna see Jaylen play when Beasley gets suspended. Jaylen was freakishly good in the preseason and could be another Beasley in a few seasons. I’d offer Vanderbilt, Jauncho and two seconds for Tucker. Really wish Rosass had not given away a second in the Ed Davis deal smh.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,744
And1: 1,965
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1357 » by jpatrick » Sun Dec 27, 2020 4:41 pm

Dual wrote:The guys I'm willing to trade:
Ed Davis
Vanderbilt
Hagans
Layman
Juancho


This will get you nothing. All these guys are negative assets, maybe neutral at best. We’re going to at least have to attach McDaniels, Bolmaro, or something positive if we want to get even a rotational PF back.

That said, we have time. No one is getting traded to closer to the deadline when players like Davis and Juancho become eligible to be moved.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,912
And1: 1,077
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1358 » by Dewey » Sun Dec 27, 2020 4:58 pm

jpatrick wrote:
Dual wrote:The guys I'm willing to trade:
Ed Davis
Vanderbilt
Hagans
Layman
Juancho


This will get you nothing. All these guys are negative assets, maybe neutral at best. We’re going to at least have to attach McDaniels, Bolmaro, or something positive if we want to get even a rotational PF back.

That said, we have time. No one is getting traded to closer to the deadline when players like Davis and Juancho become eligible to be moved.

Agree, but at the same time, all teams have negative/neutral assets... we just have to swap spit with someone to better fit each teams needs. I’m not ready to dump guys like McDaniels and Bolmaro as fillers in minor swap moves.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,513
And1: 2,895
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1359 » by Neeva » Sun Dec 27, 2020 5:09 pm

Mcdaniels needs to be thrown into the fire IMO he may surprise us.

I don’t think Tucker should be that expensive. Wolves don’t need someone that great or expensive just someone that is better than trash. I am so disappointed in Jauncho.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1360 » by moss_is_1 » Sun Dec 27, 2020 7:43 pm

Someone like Aminu or Bjelica could be worthwhile for a cheaper easy to get option. If all we're going to be trading is our scraps.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves