ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Five)

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,302
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1421 » by thinktank » Sun Jan 3, 2021 2:52 pm

Bagley seems to be the best available player.
TheDominator273
Starter
Posts: 2,001
And1: 1,083
Joined: Jul 08, 2015

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1422 » by TheDominator273 » Sun Jan 3, 2021 4:14 pm

minimus wrote:
TheDominator273 wrote:I'd love to take a swing at Marvin Bagley and hope his injury history is behind him while coming at a discount value wise.


Is he finesse player or can he provide some physical toughness?
Somewhat of both but between the two more finesse
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,741
And1: 5,227
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1423 » by minimus » Sun Jan 3, 2021 5:10 pm

Why Siakam is playing so bad? Is he injured?

16ppg, 8rpg, 4apg, but only 38%FG, 28% from 3PT, 3.5TO, 4.5 fouls.

P.S. TOR fans are bashing Siakam even more than MIN fans bashing DLo. TOR fans are bashing Nurse, despite him being one of the best coaches in NBA. Yeah, it is either hate or love.
User avatar
Dual
Veteran
Posts: 2,682
And1: 1,494
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1424 » by Dual » Sun Jan 3, 2021 5:26 pm

minimus wrote:Why Siakam is playing so bad? Is he injured?

16ppg, 8rpg, 4apg, but only 38%FG, 28% from 3PT, 3.5TO, 4.5 fouls.

P.S. TOR fans are bashing Siakam even more than MIN fans bashing DLo. TOR fans are bashing Nurse, despite him being one of the best coaches in NBA. Yeah, it is either hate or love.

DLo for Siakam
Nurse for Saunders
Do it Rosas! :lol:
IceManBK1
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 330
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1425 » by IceManBK1 » Sun Jan 3, 2021 6:24 pm

At the trade deadline
Dlo/Rubio
Edwards/Okogie
RHJ-bring him back/Culver
Aaron Gordon-Beasley+2nd rder trade/Juancho
Towns/Reid
KG_And1
Pro Prospect
Posts: 796
And1: 151
Joined: Dec 13, 2002
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1426 » by KG_And1 » Sun Jan 3, 2021 6:36 pm

IceManBK1 wrote:At the trade deadline
Dlo/Rubio
Edwards/Okogie
RHJ-bring him back/Culver
Aaron Gordon-Beasley+2nd rder trade/Juancho
Towns/Reid


This would actually be perfect.

We’re going to need Gordon/RHJ to guard Durant in the Finals.
TheDominator273
Starter
Posts: 2,001
And1: 1,083
Joined: Jul 08, 2015

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1427 » by TheDominator273 » Sun Jan 3, 2021 7:49 pm

Wolves in: Marvin Bagley III
Wolves out: Josh Okogie, Jake Layman

Kings in: Josh Okogie, Jake Layman
Kings out: Marvin Bagley III

Wolves do it to add some size and rebounding to the lineup. Bagley can play the 4 alongside both KAT and Naz or play the 5 if needed.

Kings do it to add a wing defender in Okogie and to move on from Bagley while he carries value from his draft position. They also save $2.5m with this trade.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,514
And1: 2,896
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1428 » by Neeva » Sun Jan 3, 2021 8:48 pm

minimus wrote:Why Siakam is playing so bad? Is he injured?

16ppg, 8rpg, 4apg, but only 38%FG, 28% from 3PT, 3.5TO, 4.5 fouls.

P.S. TOR fans are bashing Siakam even more than MIN fans bashing DLo. TOR fans are bashing Nurse, despite him being one of the best coaches in NBA. Yeah, it is either hate or love.


He is tanking his value, Maybe he really is a lot
Older than his listed age and starting to go downhill due to age..?
Guidus88
Junior
Posts: 344
And1: 177
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: Florence - Italy
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1429 » by Guidus88 » Sun Jan 3, 2021 8:52 pm

TheDominator273 wrote:Wolves in: Marvin Bagley III
Wolves out: Josh Okogie, Jake Layman

Kings in: Josh Okogie, Jake Layman
Kings out: Marvin Bagley III

Wolves do it to add some size and rebounding to the lineup. Bagley can play the 4 alongside both KAT and Naz or play the 5 if needed.

Kings do it to add a wing defender in Okogie and to move on from Bagley while he carries value from his draft position. They also save $2.5m with this trade.


Do you think Bagley is available?

Btw i like the trade, but I doubt kings would accept....

Maybe Culver str8 up?
K4P
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,382
And1: 17,112
Joined: Aug 27, 2017
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1430 » by K4P » Sun Jan 3, 2021 9:22 pm

minimus wrote:Why Siakam is playing so bad? Is he injured?

16ppg, 8rpg, 4apg, but only 38%FG, 28% from 3PT, 3.5TO, 4.5 fouls.

P.S. TOR fans are bashing Siakam even more than MIN fans bashing DLo. TOR fans are bashing Nurse, despite him being one of the best coaches in NBA. Yeah, it is either hate or love.

He’s just being asked to do a lot more than he’s capable of on a Raptor team that lacks talent
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,514
And1: 2,896
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1431 » by Neeva » Sun Jan 3, 2021 10:11 pm

Guidus88 wrote:
TheDominator273 wrote:Wolves in: Marvin Bagley III
Wolves out: Josh Okogie, Jake Layman

Kings in: Josh Okogie, Jake Layman
Kings out: Marvin Bagley III

Wolves do it to add some size and rebounding to the lineup. Bagley can play the 4 alongside both KAT and Naz or play the 5 if needed.

Kings do it to add a wing defender in Okogie and to move on from Bagley while he carries value from his draft position. They also save $2.5m with this trade.


Do you think Bagley is available?

Btw i like the trade, but I doubt kings would accept....

Maybe Culver str8 up?


I feel like Culver has more value as he has an extra year on his rookie deal and is not a malcontent. So to me it would have be Culver/Jauncho for Bagley/Bjelica,
wolves unload Jauncho....
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,912
And1: 1,077
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1432 » by Dewey » Sun Jan 3, 2021 11:09 pm

Rosas better pull a rabbit out of the hat.... fantasy Is over - send help for KAT.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
User avatar
Dual
Veteran
Posts: 2,682
And1: 1,494
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1433 » by Dual » Sun Jan 3, 2021 11:22 pm

If Kat don't returns and is full tank mode. If you are last in the league you assures top 3 pick or you can still do t make it?
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,514
And1: 2,896
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1434 » by Neeva » Sun Jan 3, 2021 11:38 pm

It worked for Golden state and The Knicks the past two drafts to have the worst record in the league but it only got them second and third picks.
Guidus88
Junior
Posts: 344
And1: 177
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: Florence - Italy
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1435 » by Guidus88 » Mon Jan 4, 2021 7:53 am

Neeva wrote:It worked for Golden state and The Knicks the past two drafts to have the worst record in the league but it only got them second and third picks.


well considering that the pick we traded to GSW is top3 proected that would be a win anyway...
RiRuHoops
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,390
And1: 2,020
Joined: Sep 06, 2019
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1436 » by RiRuHoops » Mon Jan 4, 2021 10:15 am

Dlo for Tobias Harris.

Wolves get a Pf, Sixers save money.
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,090
And1: 3,623
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1437 » by Foye » Mon Jan 4, 2021 12:03 pm

Guidus88 wrote:
TheDominator273 wrote:Wolves in: Marvin Bagley III
Wolves out: Josh Okogie, Jake Layman

Kings in: Josh Okogie, Jake Layman
Kings out: Marvin Bagley III

Wolves do it to add some size and rebounding to the lineup. Bagley can play the 4 alongside both KAT and Naz or play the 5 if needed.

Kings do it to add a wing defender in Okogie and to move on from Bagley while he carries value from his draft position. They also save $2.5m with this trade.


Do you think Bagley is available?

Btw i like the trade, but I doubt kings would accept....

Maybe Culver str8 up?


Culver is like the one exciting player on the roster...
Long, athletic, rebounds well, defends, doesn't jack up shot after shot...
The offense will come along.

He is the one player on the roster that you wanna actually keep.

Everyone else including KAT should've been available months ago.
Guidus88
Junior
Posts: 344
And1: 177
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: Florence - Italy
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1438 » by Guidus88 » Mon Jan 4, 2021 2:26 pm

Foye wrote:
Guidus88 wrote:
TheDominator273 wrote:Wolves in: Marvin Bagley III
Wolves out: Josh Okogie, Jake Layman

Kings in: Josh Okogie, Jake Layman
Kings out: Marvin Bagley III

Wolves do it to add some size and rebounding to the lineup. Bagley can play the 4 alongside both KAT and Naz or play the 5 if needed.

Kings do it to add a wing defender in Okogie and to move on from Bagley while he carries value from his draft position. They also save $2.5m with this trade.


Do you think Bagley is available?

Btw i like the trade, but I doubt kings would accept....

Maybe Culver str8 up?


Culver is like the one exciting player on the roster...
Long, athletic, rebounds well, defends, doesn't jack up shot after shot...
The offense will come along.

He is the one player on the roster that you wanna actually keep.

Everyone else including KAT should've been available months ago.


I do agree, and I'm also a bit reluctant to trade Culver. However with DLO, Beasley, Edwards, Okogie, maybe Rubio I don't think there will be enough space for everyone, unless they keep playing 4-1 lineup.

Although he seems to be a bit mentally weak and his shot is far from being fixed, his value is higher that Okogie and could bring us better player/picks.
jscott
Analyst
Posts: 3,072
And1: 1,365
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1439 » by jscott » Mon Jan 4, 2021 2:31 pm

Guidus88 wrote:
Foye wrote:
Guidus88 wrote:
Do you think Bagley is available?

Btw i like the trade, but I doubt kings would accept....

Maybe Culver str8 up?


Culver is like the one exciting player on the roster...
Long, athletic, rebounds well, defends, doesn't jack up shot after shot...
The offense will come along.

He is the one player on the roster that you wanna actually keep.

Everyone else including KAT should've been available months ago.


I do agree, and I'm also a bit reluctant to trade Culver. However with DLO, Beasley, Edwards, Okogie, maybe Rubio I don't think there will be enough space for everyone, unless they keep playing 4-1 lineup.

Although he seems to be a bit mentally weak and his shot is far from being fixed, his value is higher that Okogie and could bring us better player/picks.

Much rather move Okogie than Culver at this point.

Rather move DLo than either of them.
Guidus88
Junior
Posts: 344
And1: 177
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: Florence - Italy
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1440 » by Guidus88 » Mon Jan 4, 2021 2:33 pm

jscott wrote:
Guidus88 wrote:
Foye wrote:
Culver is like the one exciting player on the roster...
Long, athletic, rebounds well, defends, doesn't jack up shot after shot...
The offense will come along.

He is the one player on the roster that you wanna actually keep.

Everyone else including KAT should've been available months ago.


I do agree, and I'm also a bit reluctant to trade Culver. However with DLO, Beasley, Edwards, Okogie, maybe Rubio I don't think there will be enough space for everyone, unless they keep playing 4-1 lineup.

Although he seems to be a bit mentally weak and his shot is far from being fixed, his value is higher that Okogie and could bring us better player/picks.

Much rather move Okogie than Culver at this point.

Rather move DLo than either of them.


ofcourse, but what kind of player can we target with Okogie and DLO?

Is DLO a positive asset now?

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves