therealbig3 wrote:Jokic and Doncic aren’t on teams that are so bad in terms of supporting cast that voters will be impressed with 45-50 wins (or the equivalent for the shortened season) and a 4th-6th seed. Those teams were expected to be among the NBA’s elite this year, and so far they’ve been disappointing.
Just like I said Giannis winning would be a travesty, it would be a bigger travesty if Tatum wins it because of silly super team narratives. Because there are like at least 9 players that are crystal clearly better than him, it would be another Rose in 2011 MVP.
I def think Jokic has the worst team atm if you take him out compared to other MVP candidates.
Losing Grant,Plumlee, Craig,(MPJ injured, Murray out of form compared to the Bubble but I never saw him as an all star (no clear jump in production from and earlier stage, Barton hasn’t played since March, Millsap is old like proper old now)
In that perspective in my eyes it’s a pretty bad setup going on for Jokic.
Nuggets fans feel free to chime in, is the team as bad as I think it is or is more form/injury?
Jokic def has at least the numbers and certainly the narrative (only center in history to average a triple double let alone 10 assists that has never happened before in NBA’s history that’s pretty groundbreaking).
But yes giving the MVP to Tatum (rate him highly) would be quite unfortunate.
Carrying a lottery like team to a top 5 seed in west with no legit all stars is quite hard to do for any player.