ImageImageImage

So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and rumors

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

What is the pivot now that Harden is gone? Votes can be changed

Beal
32
33%
Lavine
24
25%
Smaller moves around the edges
41
42%
 
Total votes: 97

User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,010
And1: 26,978
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#381 » by 76ciology » Thu Jan 21, 2021 3:39 am

76ciology wrote:
phifans wrote:I don't even think any team can beat Nets by defense. The more likely way of beating Nets are to attack their weakness and not try to overcome their strength. Which means you improving your offense to a degree their poor defense can't match.

Not to mention how awful your offense would be if you play Ben Green and Thybulle big times in postseason.


To have a chance you need someone like Lavine or Beal who can score 50-60pts off a 2man game where DJ doesnt step out so often. Not Middleton, Jrue or Tobias.

While being a good OReb team that would hurt them on the boards when we miss our shots. This is how those Suns team lose games, Raja Bell also talked about this. And I also pointed this one out during the playoffs in the bubble. I wouldnt be surprised if this was the plan thats why we got D12.

Then you need multiple guards or wings who can block shots off rotations, specially rotating to the paint.

That’s your best shot.

Their weakness is they took a step back on defense. This allows you to match their offense by having the right amount of offense (which i dont think we have), then you may have the edge by being a way better defensive team.

If Shake, Seth, Tobi and Maxey sustain their points per possession off the 2 man game, maybe you have a shot. But it’s way more likely if you can get a guy like Beal or Lavine.


Watch how the Cavs were able to beat the Nets, where Nets trio almost scored 100.

Cavs relied on Sexton and Osman to combine for 67pts, compared to KD and Kyrie at 75pts.

Nets have a flaw, it’s their defense. If you can get to a certain level of “very good offense”, you can match-up with them. Then you let your defense make the necessary difference to get you the edge.

I think you can match trading baskets with them with Embiid, Shake and Lavine.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
phifans
Veteran
Posts: 2,891
And1: 658
Joined: Feb 10, 2009
         

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#382 » by phifans » Thu Jan 21, 2021 3:52 am

76ciology wrote:
76ciology wrote:
phifans wrote:I don't even think any team can beat Nets by defense. The more likely way of beating Nets are to attack their weakness and not try to overcome their strength. Which means you improving your offense to a degree their poor defense can't match.

Not to mention how awful your offense would be if you play Ben Green and Thybulle big times in postseason.


To have a chance you need someone like Lavine or Beal who can score 50-60pts off a 2man game where DJ doesnt step out so often. Not Middleton, Jrue or Tobias.

While being a good OReb team that would hurt them on the boards when we miss our shots. This is how those Suns team lose games, Raja Bell also talked about this. And I also pointed this one out during the playoffs in the bubble. I wouldnt be surprised if this was the plan thats why we got D12.

Then you need multiple guards or wings who can block shots off rotations, specially rotating to the paint.

That’s your best shot.

Their weakness is they took a step back on defense. This allows you to match their offense by having the right amount of offense (which i dont think we have), then you may have the edge by being a way better defensive team.

If Shake, Seth, Tobi and Maxey sustain their points per possession off the 2 man game, maybe you have a shot. But it’s way more likely if you can get a guy like Beal or Lavine.


Watch how the Cavs were able to beat the Nets, where Nets trio almost scored 100.

Cavs relied on Sexton and Osman to combine for 67pts, compared to KD and Kyrie at 75pts.

Nets have a flaw, it’s their defense. If you can get to a certain level of “very good offense”, you can match-up with them. Then you let your defense make the necessary difference to get you the edge.

I think you can match trading baskets with them with Embiid, Shake and Lavine.


Told you so :wink:
Wilfried
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,354
And1: 2,036
Joined: May 24, 2007

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#383 » by Wilfried » Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:30 am

Would Oladipo be an option for us?

Something like Green + Scott (expirings) + Maxey + Korkmaz + pick?

Really think Oladipo (who can play PG) could really help us getting us over the edge
skulky
Junior
Posts: 309
And1: 97
Joined: Jul 31, 2008

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#384 » by skulky » Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:50 pm

Wilfried wrote:Would Oladipo be an option for us?

Something like Green + Scott (expirings) + Maxey + Korkmaz + pick?

Really think Oladipo (who can play PG) could really help us getting us over the edge

The concern with oladipo beyond the injuries, is will he just be a rental. He is on the record saying he wants to go to Miami. He’s also a slightly below average 3P%, although shoots a decent volume with around 7 a game the last few seasons. He’s not a seem less fit, but if Morey has intel or an inclination they could secure oladipo long term, he could be an option.
User avatar
51X3RF4N
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,159
And1: 935
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
       

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#385 » by 51X3RF4N » Thu Jan 21, 2021 1:06 pm

skulky wrote:
Wilfried wrote:Would Oladipo be an option for us?

Something like Green + Scott (expirings) + Maxey + Korkmaz + pick?

Really think Oladipo (who can play PG) could really help us getting us over the edge

The concern with oladipo beyond the injuries, is will he just be a rental. He is on the record saying he wants to go to Miami. He’s also a slightly below average 3P%, although shoots a decent volume with around 7 a game the last few seasons. He’s not a seem less fit, but if Morey has intel or an inclination they could secure oladipo long term, he could be an option.
Where is the record of him saying he wants to go to Miami? I've seen reporters speculate but never heard an on the record of it.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Your Future Sixers

C- Embiid/?
PF- ?/?
SF- ?/?
SG- ?/?
PG- ?/?
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,651
And1: 18,901
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#386 » by Stanford » Thu Jan 21, 2021 1:17 pm

Isn't Olidipo going to want a bigger deal than he has now? How are we going to manage adding that long term, with Harris, Ben and Joel already on the books?
sixers4real
Analyst
Posts: 3,071
And1: 2,025
Joined: Nov 27, 2015
Location: Russia
 

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#387 » by sixers4real » Thu Jan 21, 2021 2:30 pm

Wilfried wrote:Would Oladipo be an option for us?

Something like Green + Scott (expirings) + Maxey + Korkmaz + pick?

Really think Oladipo (who can play PG) could really help us getting us over the edge

Why are we trading Maxeyand his rookie contract, a great vet in Green and good defense for Oladipo?

He is not bringing us a championship. Maxey is valuable. Oh and a pick, wow.
Sixers fan since 2001. From Russia.
sixers4real
Analyst
Posts: 3,071
And1: 2,025
Joined: Nov 27, 2015
Location: Russia
 

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#388 » by sixers4real » Thu Jan 21, 2021 2:34 pm

We have so many valuable assets:
Seth Curry (elite shooter with excellent contract)
Thybulle (rookie contract)
Maxey (rookie contract)
Milton (excellent contract)
Green (3-time nba champ expiring)
1st round picks
2nd round pick

All very good players I am so glad that we have Morey running things now. If Brand was running the show we would most probably be left with Embiid Harden Harris and Scott right now. And no picks whatsoever.
Sixers fan since 2001. From Russia.
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,844
And1: 20,001
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#389 » by Kobblehead » Thu Jan 21, 2021 2:50 pm

Hell no to Oladipo

- injury prone
- expiring contract heading to Miami
- mixed results as a creator
- questionable ability to regain form
- small sample size of true stardom
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,785
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#390 » by youngcrev » Thu Jan 21, 2021 7:21 pm

The Sixers have a +15.1 net rating with Embiid, Simmons and Harris on the floor.

The only trio with more minutes together and a better net rating is Kawhi/George/Batum at 16.1.

Those 3 plus Curry has a net rating +21.6 in 172 minutes. No 4 player combination that's played more minutes together has a better rating.

....Now... I'm not saying this means a ton with the competition they've played, moreso just putting the numbers out there, but maybe you don't need to do something drastic. Still seems like they need a playmaking scorer in terms of roster build, but maybe Shake can be that (at least moreso than anyone we can get without blowing up the roster). Maybe you do just make moves around the margins with guys that fit the style they want to play?

I know we've had lineup darlings in the past that didn't work quite as well once he hit the postseason (Roco/Dario year), but we clearly have more playmakers now, as well Joel playing at an MVP level.
Bum Adebayo
General Manager
Posts: 7,711
And1: 4,075
Joined: Apr 28, 2016

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#391 » by Bum Adebayo » Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:48 pm

Agreed, we don't need to do many changes, as seen in the past with our postseason success...
It all hinges on Simmons being able to be a difference maker on offense, if not, we will be second round fodder as usual.
sixers hoops
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 10,081
And1: 3,529
Joined: Jun 28, 2002

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#392 » by sixers hoops » Thu Jan 21, 2021 11:18 pm

51X3RF4N wrote:
skulky wrote:
Wilfried wrote:Would Oladipo be an option for us?

Something like Green + Scott (expirings) + Maxey + Korkmaz + pick?

Really think Oladipo (who can play PG) could really help us getting us over the edge

The concern with oladipo beyond the injuries, is will he just be a rental. He is on the record saying he wants to go to Miami. He’s also a slightly below average 3P%, although shoots a decent volume with around 7 a game the last few seasons. He’s not a seem less fit, but if Morey has intel or an inclination they could secure oladipo long term, he could be an option.
Where is the record of him saying he wants to go to Miami? I've seen reporters speculate but never heard an on the record of it.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


Players under contract don’t really give interviews saying where they want to go. We knew Harden wanted Jersey, but I don’t recall him saying it on the record.
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,785
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#393 » by youngcrev » Fri Jan 22, 2021 3:07 am

If Beal ends up getting dealt somewhere and the Wizards move into a rebuild mode, how about Davis Bertans as an option for us?

Not in love with the contract or the defense... But man can that guy impact the game with his shooting. The Wizards were 8.2 points per 100 better offensively with him on the floor last year. The Spurs were 9.6 better the year before.

Main question being whether that type of player would be worth his salary to us or if we're better with the bargain basement version of it with Korkmaz.
sixers hoops
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 10,081
And1: 3,529
Joined: Jun 28, 2002

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#394 » by sixers hoops » Fri Jan 22, 2021 4:05 am

youngcrev wrote:If Beal ends up getting dealt somewhere and the Wizards move into a rebuild mode, how about Davis Bertans as an option for us?

Not in love with the contract or the defense... But man can that guy impact the game with his shooting. The Wizards were 8.2 points per 100 better offensively with him on the floor last year. The Spurs were 9.6 better the year before.

Main question being whether that type of player would be worth his salary to us or if we're better with the bargain basement version of it with Korkmaz.


I’m in. His shooting is insane.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,010
And1: 26,978
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#395 » by 76ciology » Fri Jan 22, 2021 6:34 am

I like shake.

I even created a controversial thread just to start him when they say it’s too early.

But how comfortable are you guys in his scoring in crunch time?

If you look at the numbers our top 3 options in crunch time are.

Biid - 25% of crunch time shots
Tobias - 15% of crunch time shots
Milton - 11% of crunch time shots
Shake, Ben and Green are all at 9%

Shake can improve and I acknowledge his upside as a scorer. But he’s more of a fool’s gold now if you think he can be relied to be a go to guy down the stretch.

When the defense is high (crunch time), he shoots only 22%, this is really bad compared to Tobias and Biid’s shooting numbers at 50-60%. While he leads the team in scoring at the least crucial moments of the games (garbage time).

I like him and how he has improved. He should improve on how to get his shots off on ISO, his handles still need improvement.

But I think you’re handicapped if you can will play the “league approved” trading baskets in the playoffs. Which this Nets team should be the best in the league.

If you look at it we probably are at par with the bucks on these moments.

Biid = Giannis
Tobias = Middleton
Jrue (25% shooting) = Shake (22% shooting)

Nevertheless, it’s not yet an issue given Biid has been delivering like Peak Dirk Nowitzki while Biid and Tobi are shooting at a high clip on the 40% of our crunch time shots.
But do you really trust Tobi to shoot this well? :)

To dig deeper.. the biggest problem is on the handful of game defining shots/possessions. This is where Celts lead the pack when Tatum and Brown leads with 14FGM compared to just 3 FGM by Tobi and Biid.

When we need a shot to win or tie the game, who do you go to?



:lol:
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,785
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#396 » by youngcrev » Fri Jan 22, 2021 12:11 pm

76ciology wrote:I like shake.

I even created a controversial thread just to start him when they say it’s too early.

But how comfortable are you guys in his scoring in crunch time?

If you look at the numbers our top 3 options in crunch time are.

Biid - 25% of crunch time shots
Tobias - 15% of crunch time shots
Milton - 11% of crunch time shots
Shake, Ben and Green are all at 9%

Shake can improve and I acknowledge his upside as a scorer. But he’s more of a fool’s gold now if you think he can be relied to be a go to guy down the stretch.

When the defense is high (crunch time), he shoots only 22%, this is really bad compared to Tobias and Biid’s shooting numbers at 50-60%. While he leads the team in scoring at the least crucial moments of the games (garbage time).

I like him and how he has improved. He should improve on how to get his shots off on ISO, his handles still need improvement.

But I think you’re handicapped if you can will play the “league approved” trading baskets in the playoffs. Which this Nets team should be the best in the league.

If you look at it we probably are at par with the bucks on these moments.

Biid = Giannis
Tobias = Middleton
Jrue (25% shooting) = Shake (22% shooting)

Nevertheless, it’s not yet an issue given Biid has been delivering like Peak Dirk Nowitzki while Biid and Tobi are shooting at a high clip on the 40% of our crunch time shots.
But do you really trust Tobi to shoot this well? :)

To dig deeper.. the biggest problem is on the handful of game defining shots/possessions. This is where Celts lead the pack when Tatum and Brown leads with 14FGM compared to just 3 FGM by Tobi and Biid.

When we need a shot to win or tie the game, who do you go to?



:lol:


I think you're reading into the stats incorrectly. If you notice the W/L column, the Sixers have been fantastic in clutch situations this year with a 5-1 record (5-0 when Embiid plays). Joel has done a great job handling double teams this and finding the open man.

As for Shake, he hasn't really had the opportunity to be the main perimeter threat down the stretch (unbelievable that they went away from him in the Memphis game), so the stats are pretty meaningless. Joel is going to be option 1, but I think he's clearly our best perimeter option and should be getting looks over Tobias. And if we get into tie game, wind the clock and take the last shot mode, I imagine he is the guy they'd look to. For now, I think they prefer running actual plays rather hero ball, which tends to be far more effective.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,010
And1: 26,978
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#397 » by 76ciology » Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:50 pm

youngcrev wrote:
76ciology wrote:I like shake.

I even created a controversial thread just to start him when they say it’s too early.

But how comfortable are you guys in his scoring in crunch time?

If you look at the numbers our top 3 options in crunch time are.

Biid - 25% of crunch time shots
Tobias - 15% of crunch time shots
Milton - 11% of crunch time shots
Shake, Ben and Green are all at 9%

Shake can improve and I acknowledge his upside as a scorer. But he’s more of a fool’s gold now if you think he can be relied to be a go to guy down the stretch.

When the defense is high (crunch time), he shoots only 22%, this is really bad compared to Tobias and Biid’s shooting numbers at 50-60%. While he leads the team in scoring at the least crucial moments of the games (garbage time).

I like him and how he has improved. He should improve on how to get his shots off on ISO, his handles still need improvement.

But I think you’re handicapped if you can will play the “league approved” trading baskets in the playoffs. Which this Nets team should be the best in the league.

If you look at it we probably are at par with the bucks on these moments.

Biid = Giannis
Tobias = Middleton
Jrue (25% shooting) = Shake (22% shooting)

Nevertheless, it’s not yet an issue given Biid has been delivering like Peak Dirk Nowitzki while Biid and Tobi are shooting at a high clip on the 40% of our crunch time shots.
But do you really trust Tobi to shoot this well? :)

To dig deeper.. the biggest problem is on the handful of game defining shots/possessions. This is where Celts lead the pack when Tatum and Brown leads with 14FGM compared to just 3 FGM by Tobi and Biid.

When we need a shot to win or tie the game, who do you go to?



:lol:


I think you're reading into the stats incorrectly. If you notice the W/L column, the Sixers have been fantastic in clutch situations this year with a 5-1 record (5-0 when Embiid plays). Joel has done a great job handling double teams this and finding the open man.

As for Shake, he hasn't really had the opportunity to be the main perimeter threat down the stretch (unbelievable that they went away from him in the Memphis game), so the stats are pretty meaningless. Joel is going to be option 1, but I think he's clearly our best perimeter option and should be getting looks over Tobias. And if we get into tie game, wind the clock and take the last shot mode, I imagine he is the guy they'd look to. For now, I think they prefer running actual plays rather hero ball, which tends to be far more effective.


i said it’s not an issue with how Biid and Tobias are shooting right now.

So I notice..

“the W/L column, the Sixers have been fantastic in clutch situations this year with a 5-1 record”

The issue is.. what if Biid and Tobias hot hand is just temporary and they played like how they’ve played in the last two seasons. Because right now they’re shooting 50-60% on clutch moments (against some of the worst teams this season), and I dont know how sustainable that is.

And I’m also pointed out that as good as Shake is, he hasn’t been proven to be reliable in crunch time, given how he only has shot 22%. Nothing wrong with that. It just says he needs to improve or maybe more opportunity

I just find it hard to imagine Biid can be a reliable scorer to get us a 3 or a shot with the time running down. But I believe I saw some glimpse of this during our game with the Heat, so maybe he can.

So..

If Biid and Tobias continues their hot shooting in crunch time = no problem

Either way, Shake’s not been reliable in crunch time. And we should find ways to get him better looks.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,010
And1: 26,978
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#398 » by 76ciology » Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:59 pm



You’ll have to play this “trading baskets” game in the playoffs. I believe Biid, Tobi and Shake can go head to head against the Bucks. And possibly the Nets.

And if our offense fails us, I hope Ben’s defense and transition offense will be the difference maker
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
youngcrev
RealGM
Posts: 28,785
And1: 9,699
Joined: Jun 12, 2005
Location: Philadelphia(ish)
   

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#399 » by youngcrev » Fri Jan 22, 2021 2:05 pm

76ciology wrote:
youngcrev wrote:
76ciology wrote:I like shake.

I even created a controversial thread just to start him when they say it’s too early.

But how comfortable are you guys in his scoring in crunch time?

If you look at the numbers our top 3 options in crunch time are.

Biid - 25% of crunch time shots
Tobias - 15% of crunch time shots
Milton - 11% of crunch time shots
Shake, Ben and Green are all at 9%

Shake can improve and I acknowledge his upside as a scorer. But he’s more of a fool’s gold now if you think he can be relied to be a go to guy down the stretch.

When the defense is high (crunch time), he shoots only 22%, this is really bad compared to Tobias and Biid’s shooting numbers at 50-60%. While he leads the team in scoring at the least crucial moments of the games (garbage time).

I like him and how he has improved. He should improve on how to get his shots off on ISO, his handles still need improvement.

But I think you’re handicapped if you can will play the “league approved” trading baskets in the playoffs. Which this Nets team should be the best in the league.

If you look at it we probably are at par with the bucks on these moments.

Biid = Giannis
Tobias = Middleton
Jrue (25% shooting) = Shake (22% shooting)

Nevertheless, it’s not yet an issue given Biid has been delivering like Peak Dirk Nowitzki while Biid and Tobi are shooting at a high clip on the 40% of our crunch time shots.
But do you really trust Tobi to shoot this well? :)

To dig deeper.. the biggest problem is on the handful of game defining shots/possessions. This is where Celts lead the pack when Tatum and Brown leads with 14FGM compared to just 3 FGM by Tobi and Biid.

When we need a shot to win or tie the game, who do you go to?



:lol:


I think you're reading into the stats incorrectly. If you notice the W/L column, the Sixers have been fantastic in clutch situations this year with a 5-1 record (5-0 when Embiid plays). Joel has done a great job handling double teams this and finding the open man.

As for Shake, he hasn't really had the opportunity to be the main perimeter threat down the stretch (unbelievable that they went away from him in the Memphis game), so the stats are pretty meaningless. Joel is going to be option 1, but I think he's clearly our best perimeter option and should be getting looks over Tobias. And if we get into tie game, wind the clock and take the last shot mode, I imagine he is the guy they'd look to. For now, I think they prefer running actual plays rather hero ball, which tends to be far more effective.


i said it’s not an issue with how Biid and Tobias are shooting right now.

So I notice..

“the W/L column, the Sixers have been fantastic in clutch situations this year with a 5-1 record”


I'm just thrown by why you'd even bother to bring up the numbers in the context of it being a problem when they obviously don't show that.

I think it's a legit question mark for the team. But aside from the Jimmy year, we're better built for these situations than we have been.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,010
And1: 26,978
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: So what's the pivot? (Beal, Lavine, or smaller moves)? - Post Harden ideas and Rumors 

Post#400 » by 76ciology » Fri Jan 22, 2021 4:11 pm

youngcrev wrote:
76ciology wrote:
youngcrev wrote:
I think you're reading into the stats incorrectly. If you notice the W/L column, the Sixers have been fantastic in clutch situations this year with a 5-1 record (5-0 when Embiid plays). Joel has done a great job handling double teams this and finding the open man.

As for Shake, he hasn't really had the opportunity to be the main perimeter threat down the stretch (unbelievable that they went away from him in the Memphis game), so the stats are pretty meaningless. Joel is going to be option 1, but I think he's clearly our best perimeter option and should be getting looks over Tobias. And if we get into tie game, wind the clock and take the last shot mode, I imagine he is the guy they'd look to. For now, I think they prefer running actual plays rather hero ball, which tends to be far more effective.


i said it’s not an issue with how Biid and Tobias are shooting right now.

So I notice..

“the W/L column, the Sixers have been fantastic in clutch situations this year with a 5-1 record”


I'm just thrown by why you'd even bother to bring up the numbers in the context of it being a problem when they obviously don't show that.

I think it's a legit question mark for the team. But aside from the Jimmy year, we're better built for these situations than we have been.


because i want people to know the limitation of Shake, a player i really like.

Shake is a good player. But as of now, he’s not proven to be reliable to participate in those “trading baskets” moments in crunch time. Like what recently we’ve witnessed Colin Sexton did against the Nets. He’s nowhere near that good and his scoring is done mostly on the non-crucial moments of the game.

So for now, like I pointed out, I do acknowledge that we are doing well for now. But this relies a lot on Tobi and Biid’s hot shooting this season. And like I said, it’s not an issues if both can sustain it. But im staying open minded to the possibility in a “what if” scenario if both guys would revert back to how they play in recent years.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers