ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,316
And1: 9,519
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1781 » by payitforward » Tue Jan 26, 2021 3:59 pm

DCZards wrote:
payitforward wrote:Barrett is a hot mess. Yes, he is a bit better this year than last -- mostly b/c he's rebounding a bit better & turning it over a bit less while bringing up his lousy FT % -- with the result that he is simply bad rather than absolutely horrible.

He might get better over time of course. Or he might not. Or he might get worse. One thing for sure is that he isn't someone to target in a trade.

Given that he’s just 20 years old I’d expect Barrett to continue to get better…rather than worse. He's shown solid improvement since his rookie season.

This is from an article published today in Forbes.

Last year, Barrett averaged 14.3 points, 5.0 rebounds and 2.6 assists per game, which is actually quite good on the surface. But a deeper dive shows that the Canadian wing shot only 40.2% from the field and 32.0% from three — with a true shooting percentage of 47.9%. On top of that, Barrett’s advanced stats showed that he was rather obstructive as a member of the Knicks rotation, as his -2.9 OBPM (offensive box plus/minus) and -1.5 DBPM (defensive box plus/minus) made him a significant on-court negative.

This year, Barrett is averaging 17.4 points, 7.1 rebounds and 3.4 assists per game and looks a lot more comfortable in every aspect of the game. The 20-year-old is becoming one of the best in the league at getting himself to the rim, where he is capable of either finishing or drawing fouls. Barrett’s free throw attempts are up to just about five per game, but he is shooting 76.2% from the charity stripe, which looks a whole lot better than last year’s 61.4%. And despite the fact that his three-point percentage is only 25% this year, his stroke looks a little better than it did a year ago. He’s also 8 for 18 from the outside over the last six games. Barrett isn’t going to shoot 44.4% from deep the rest of the season, but the confidence is nice to see and the higher clip falls in line with his improved free-throw shooting.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharycohen/2021/01/25/new-yorks-rj-barrett-is-beginning-to-live-up-to-the-hype/?sh=219e464bbc6e

Yes, of course I would expect him to get better -- for one thing, he's better this year than last. A good indication that more improvement might be in the offing.

But, what I wrote remains true: he was absolutely horrible last year, & he's still bad this year. Plus, I really don't get why you cite an article like this one from Forbes. Why yes, Barrett is averaging 20% more points per game -- he's playing 20% more minutes per game! That doesn't come go the heading of "improvement."

Per 40 minutes, he is producing .39 more points than last year. &, since his eFG% is unchanged, that's entirely from shooting FTs a bit better. Still, his efficiency has improved -- tho it's still lousy.

Where he's definitely improved: more defensive boards, more offensive boards, fewer turnovers (tho this is partly undone by fewer steals) & improvement in assists.

As you point out, Barrett is only 20 -- the age Troy Brown Jr. was a little less than 11 months ago. Has Barrett played as well to this point as Troy had played up to last February? No. & it isn't close. & Troy was a #15 pick, while RJB went #3.

Conclusion: to this point Barrett has been an enormous disappointment, not a good player at all. Since he was also not a good player in college, that's not much of a surprise.

Yet... you are right that he might improve a whole lot. Some do, some don't.

Last year, when I pointed out that high picks Barrett, Hunter, Garland, Culver, White, & Reddish had all been awful rookies, you made the point that they were young & you expected them to become good players. DeAndre Hunter has done that. None of the others have. Door's not closed, of course, but... in the nature of things it's closing.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1782 » by NatP4 » Tue Jan 26, 2021 4:04 pm

If they tank well enough and end up with Mobley/Suggs and fire Brooks in the off-season, and replace him with a quality coach, I would absolutely keep Beal, let him retire a Wizard, build around him.

Absolute dream scenario would be to end up at 2-3 in the draft, find out that teams below want Cunningham/Kuninga/Suggs, trade down for another late 1st and get Mobley and Jared Butler.

Westbrook Butler
Beal Mathews
Avdija Brown Jr
Bonga Bertans
Mobley Bryant
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 71,476
And1: 24,145
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1783 » by nate33 » Tue Jan 26, 2021 4:17 pm

NatP4 wrote:If they tank well enough and end up with Mobley/Suggs and fire Brooks in the off-season, and replace him with a quality coach, I would absolutely keep Beal, let him retire a Wizard, build around him.

Absolute dream scenario would be to end up at 2-3 in the draft, find out that teams below want Cunningham/Kuninga/Suggs, trade down for another late 1st and get Mobley and Jared Butler.

Westbrook Butler
Beal Mathews
Avdija Brown Jr
Bonga Bertans
Mobley Bryant


I see that you forgot about Hachimura.

I wonder if there's some way to combine Hachimura and our top pick and come away with both Suggs and Mobley. I'm dreaming, I know.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1784 » by Ruzious » Tue Jan 26, 2021 4:17 pm

NatP4 wrote:If they tank well enough and end up with Mobley/Suggs and fire Brooks in the off-season, and replace him with a quality coach, I would absolutely keep Beal, let him retire a Wizard, build around him.

Absolute dream scenario would be to end up at 2-3 in the draft, find out that teams below want Cunningham/Kuninga/Suggs, trade down for another late 1st and get Mobley and Jared Butler.

Westbrook Butler
Beal Mathews
Avdija Brown Jr
Bonga Bertans
Mobley Bryant

Getting Mobley would be a game-changer.

Did you trade Rui? It might take Rui to get Butler.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1785 » by NatP4 » Tue Jan 26, 2021 4:23 pm

The combination of Avdija&Bonga at the 3/4 is so much more appealing to me than Hachimura. If they could move him on draft night for a deal that brings back Jared Butler that would be incredible.

I think Butler is the Brandon Clarke of this draft. Valued below all of the one and dones, but a significantly better player, and only going to be 21 on draft night. We need to get some draft thread discussion going about whether or not Butler is going to be a better NBA player than Suggs and Cunningham.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 71,476
And1: 24,145
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1786 » by nate33 » Tue Jan 26, 2021 4:29 pm

NatP4 wrote:The combination of Avdija&Bonga at the 3/4 is so much more appealing to me than Hachimura. If they could move him on draft night for a deal that brings back Jared Butler that would be incredible.

I think Butler is the Brandon Clarke of this draft. Valued below all of the one and dones, but a significantly better player, and only going to be 21 on draft night. We need to get some draft thread discussion going about whether or not Butler is going to be a better NBA player than Suggs and Cunningham.

I'm not as down on Hachimura as you, but if we landed Mobley, there really wouldn't be that much room for him.

I'd start Mobley at PF alongside Bryant, and finish games with Mobley at center alongside Bertans.

I also wonder if, over time, we might see Avdija shifting to more of a full time PF role as he fills out. Which would make Hachimura even more unnecessary.

But all of this is tough to assess because Brooks does not run a system that fits the skills of our players. We really don't know how Avdija, Brown, Bonga and Hachimura would fare in a decentralized offensive system that actually makes sense for them.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,316
And1: 9,519
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1787 » by payitforward » Tue Jan 26, 2021 4:29 pm

prime1time wrote:What if the Wizards finish high in the lottery and use that pick to trade for a star? I.e., we trade get a high draft pick and we trade for Karl Anthony Towns?

Obviously, it'd take more than the pick to trade for Towns. How many players & picks do you want to give away to be able to pay Beal, Westbrook & Towns a combined $110m?

Let's say they'd take our pick plus Bertans & Bryant for Towns. Do you think they'd do that? Seems doubtful -- & especially with Bryant coming off a serious injury. & Bertans -- at least to this point -- looking substantially overpaid.

But... let's say they are willing. We'd have Westbrook, Beal, Towns, Rui, Deni & TBJ -- 6 guys -- for just over $124m.

The Luxury Tax might come in about $134m. So all we'd have to do is fill out the roster with 9 more players for $10m total.

Is that what you had in mind?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 71,476
And1: 24,145
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1788 » by nate33 » Tue Jan 26, 2021 4:31 pm

payitforward wrote:
prime1time wrote:What if the Wizards finish high in the lottery and use that pick to trade for a star? I.e., we trade get a high draft pick and we trade for Karl Anthony Towns?

Obviously, it'd take more than the pick to trade for Towns. How many players & picks do you want to give away to be able to pay Beal, Westbrook & Towns a combined $110m?

Let's say they'd take our pick plus Bertans & Bryant for Towns. Do you think they'd do that? Seems doubtful -- & especially with Bryant coming off a serious injury. & Bertans -- at least to this point -- looking substantially overpaid.

But... let's say they are willing. We'd have Westbrook, Beal, Towns, Rui, Deni & TBJ -- 6 guys -- for just over $124m.

The Luxury Tax might come in about $134m. So all we'd have to do is fill out the roster with 9 more players for $10m total.

Is that what you had in mind?

Any deal like that would have to be predicated on the team being willing to pay the luxtax for the final two seasons of Westbrook's contract.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1789 » by NatP4 » Tue Jan 26, 2021 4:37 pm

nate33 wrote:
NatP4 wrote:The combination of Avdija&Bonga at the 3/4 is so much more appealing to me than Hachimura. If they could move him on draft night for a deal that brings back Jared Butler that would be incredible.

I think Butler is the Brandon Clarke of this draft. Valued below all of the one and dones, but a significantly better player, and only going to be 21 on draft night. We need to get some draft thread discussion going about whether or not Butler is going to be a better NBA player than Suggs and Cunningham.

I'm not as down on Hachimura as you, but if we landed Mobley, there really wouldn't be that much room for him.

I'd start Mobley at PF alongside Bryant, and finish games with Mobley at center alongside Bertans.

I also wonder if, over time, we might see Avdija shifting to more of a full time PF role as he fills out. Which would make Hachimura even more unnecessary.

But all of this is tough to assess because Brooks does not run a system that fits the skills of our players. We really don't know how Avdija, Brown, Bonga and Hachimura would fare in a decentralized offensive system that actually makes sense for them.


Very true, we also don’t know how Hachimura would look next to an actual rim protector like Mobley. At this point, we basically know nothing about Troy brown jr as a player!

I still think the best possible lineups you can throw out there are lineups that feature wing players at the 3&4, and a 5 that protects the rim and can switch everything. I’m closing games with Avdija-Bonga-Mobley at the 3-4-5.

If some team calls on draft night with the 20th or so pick with Butler still on the board, and asks for Rui, I would do it with no hesitation.

Of course, none of this will happen, the wizards will win a few more games than we would like, finish in the 8-10 slot again and pick Greg Brown. Bonga will be traded for a future 2nd round pick or something. Brooks will certainly not be back, but I have no optimism about the new hire.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,237
And1: 5,107
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1790 » by DCZards » Tue Jan 26, 2021 5:00 pm

payitforward wrote:
DCZards wrote:Given that he’s just 20 years old I’d expect Barrett to continue to get better…rather than worse. He's shown solid improvement since his rookie season.

This is from an article published today in Forbes.

Last year, Barrett averaged 14.3 points, 5.0 rebounds and 2.6 assists per game, which is actually quite good on the surface. But a deeper dive shows that the Canadian wing shot only 40.2% from the field and 32.0% from three — with a true shooting percentage of 47.9%. On top of that, Barrett’s advanced stats showed that he was rather obstructive as a member of the Knicks rotation, as his -2.9 OBPM (offensive box plus/minus) and -1.5 DBPM (defensive box plus/minus) made him a significant on-court negative.

This year, Barrett is averaging 17.4 points, 7.1 rebounds and 3.4 assists per game and looks a lot more comfortable in every aspect of the game. The 20-year-old is becoming one of the best in the league at getting himself to the rim, where he is capable of either finishing or drawing fouls. Barrett’s free throw attempts are up to just about five per game, but he is shooting 76.2% from the charity stripe, which looks a whole lot better than last year’s 61.4%. And despite the fact that his three-point percentage is only 25% this year, his stroke looks a little better than it did a year ago. He’s also 8 for 18 from the outside over the last six games. Barrett isn’t going to shoot 44.4% from deep the rest of the season, but the confidence is nice to see and the higher clip falls in line with his improved free-throw shooting.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharycohen/2021/01/25/new-yorks-rj-barrett-is-beginning-to-live-up-to-the-hype/?sh=219e464bbc6e

Yes, of course I would expect him to get better -- for one thing, he's better this year than last. A good indication that more improvement might be in the offing.

But, what I wrote remains true: he was absolutely horrible last year, & he's still bad this year. Plus, I really don't get why you cite an article like this one from Forbes. Why yes, Barrett is averaging 20% more points per game -- he's playing 20% more minutes per game! That doesn't come go the heading of "improvement."

Per 40 minutes, he is producing .39 more points than last year. &, since his eFG% is unchanged, that's entirely from shooting FTs a bit better. Still, his efficiency has improved -- tho it's still lousy.

Where he's definitely improved: more defensive boards, more offensive boards, fewer turnovers (tho this is partly undone by fewer steals) & improvement in assists.

As you point out, Barrett is only 20 -- the age Troy Brown Jr. was a little less than 11 months ago. Has Barrett played as well to this point as Troy had played up to last February? No. & it isn't close. & Troy was a #15 pick, while RJB went #3.

Conclusion: to this point Barrett has been an enormous disappointment, not a good player at all. Since he was also not a good player in college, that's not much of a surprise.

Yet... you are right that he might improve a whole lot. Some do, some don't.

Last year, when I pointed out that high picks Barrett, Hunter, Garland, Culver, White, & Reddish had all been awful rookies, you made the point that they were young & you expected them to become good players. DeAndre Hunter has done that. None of the others have. Door's not closed, of course, but... in the nature of things it's closing.

The three rookies from last season that I talked about the most and was the highest on (Garland, Barrett, Hunter) are all on the right trajectory, imo. I disagree that any of them have been an “enormous disappointment”… and I don’t think the teams that drafted them feel that way. NBA teams are looking at the long game when they draft a 19 year old, one-and-done college player. I seriously doubt that teams, coaches and GMs are as fixated on their short-term numbers as you are.

I never said much about White, Culver or Reddish, other than to state the fact that they were rookies with one year of college experience and, as in the case of the three players mentioned above, it was FAR too early to determine whether drafting them in the top 10 was a good or bad decision.

(I cite the Forbes article because it's about RJ Barrett, who we happen to be discussing.)

As for Troy Brown, we're both big fans of his. But I'd take Barrett over him in a heartbeat.
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,956
And1: 9,343
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1791 » by queridiculo » Tue Jan 26, 2021 5:10 pm

payitforward wrote:
prime1time wrote:What if the Wizards finish high in the lottery and use that pick to trade for a star? I.e., we trade get a high draft pick and we trade for Karl Anthony Towns?

Obviously, it'd take more than the pick to trade for Towns. How many players & picks do you want to give away to be able to pay Beal, Westbrook & Towns a combined $110m?

Let's say they'd take our pick plus Bertans & Bryant for Towns. Do you think they'd do that? Seems doubtful -- & especially with Bryant coming off a serious injury. & Bertans -- at least to this point -- looking substantially overpaid.

But... let's say they are willing. We'd have Westbrook, Beal, Towns, Rui, Deni & TBJ -- 6 guys -- for just over $124m.

The Luxury Tax might come in about $134m. So all we'd have to do is fill out the roster with 9 more players for $10m total.

Is that what you had in mind?


Any team competing for a title is invariably going to have to dip into the luxury tax.

Washington being a luxury tax was invariably going to happen, with or without this hypothetical trade.
JAR69
Pro Prospect
Posts: 757
And1: 295
Joined: Jul 25, 2002
   

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1792 » by JAR69 » Tue Jan 26, 2021 7:43 pm

NatP4 wrote:
Of course, none of this will happen, the wizards will win a few more games than we would like, finish in the 8-10 slot again and pick Greg Brown. Bonga will be traded for a future 2nd round pick or something. Brooks will certainly not be back, but I have no optimism about the new hire.


This is just a classic Wizards fan post.

And, of course, accurate.
"It takes talent, strategy and millions of dollars to compete in the N.B.A. But regret is the league’s greatest currency." - Howard Beck
Silvie Lysandra
Starter
Posts: 2,269
And1: 542
Joined: May 22, 2007
   

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1793 » by Silvie Lysandra » Tue Jan 26, 2021 7:46 pm

Returning to the Beal trade framework:

Code: Select all

Wizards out

Beal
Brown Jr.
Bertans

Wizards in:
Okongwu
Hunter
Korkmaz
Snell
Green
2023 PHLottery protected 1st

Hawks In:
Simmons
Brown Jr.

Hawks out:
Bogdanovic
Snell
Hunter
Okongwu
2021 2nd

76ers out:
Simmons
Korkmaz
Green
2023 protected first

76ers in:
Beal
Bogdanovic
Bertans


Why for the Wizards? Gets a solid return on Beal, while getting value out of the Bertans deal. TBJ might be overvalued here but the wing rotation gets even more crowded which doesn't help him.

Why for the 76ers:

While Simmons is a lot to give up, this deal solves their fit issues with Simmons and Embiid, while giving them a premier perimeter threat. Bertans is also a tremendous fit with his shooting, and the team has more than enough defense overall.

Why for the Hawks:

While Hunter is looking like a good player, Simmons is an all world defender, secondary playmaker, is locked down long term, and is young enough to fit their timeline. They also get to kick the tires on Brown Jr. in a far less crowded backcourt which will appreciate another multi-tool playmaker.

Now to try to answer objections, though I may be wrong in my analysis.

"Why don't the 76ers/Hawks cut the Wizards/76ers out?" - Atlanta's youth doesn't fit Philly's timeline, they would want someone who's ready to contend now. Similarly, the Wizards wouldn't flatly turn down Simmons for Beal straight up, but they're also not sure what kind of team they can build around him.

"The Hawks are giving up too much for Simmons!"

Possibly. Reddish would be a consideration, but it would need additional value to make it fair. Reddish + Okongwu for Simmons seems like an underpay.
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,333
And1: 2,873
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1794 » by pcbothwel » Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:23 pm

Chaos Revenant wrote:Returning to the Beal trade framework:

Code: Select all

Wizards out

Beal
Brown Jr.
Bertans

Wizards in:
Okongwu
Hunter
Korkmaz
Snell
Green
2023 PHLottery protected 1st

Hawks In:
Simmons
Brown Jr.

Hawks out:
Bogdanovic
Snell
Hunter
Okongwu
2021 2nd

76ers out:
Simmons
Korkmaz
Green
2023 protected first

76ers in:
Beal
Bogdanovic
Bertans


Why for the Wizards? Gets a solid return on Beal, while getting value out of the Bertans deal. TBJ might be overvalued here but the wing rotation gets even more crowded which doesn't help him.

Why for the 76ers:

While Simmons is a lot to give up, this deal solves their fit issues with Simmons and Embiid, while giving them a premier perimeter threat. Bertans is also a tremendous fit with his shooting, and the team has more than enough defense overall.

Why for the Hawks:

While Hunter is looking like a good player, Simmons is an all world defender, secondary playmaker, is locked down long term, and is young enough to fit their timeline. They also get to kick the tires on Brown Jr. in a far less crowded backcourt which will appreciate another multi-tool playmaker.

Now to try to answer objections, though I may be wrong in my analysis.

"Why don't the 76ers/Hawks cut the Wizards/76ers out?" - Atlanta's youth doesn't fit Philly's timeline, they would want someone who's ready to contend now. Similarly, the Wizards wouldn't flatly turn down Simmons for Beal straight up, but they're also not sure what kind of team they can build around him.

"The Hawks are giving up too much for Simmons!"

Possibly. Reddish would be a consideration, but it would need additional value to make it fair. Reddish + Okongwu for Simmons seems like an underpay.


This is pretty bad. Bertans alone is worth an expiring (Snell) and a protected 2023 pick.

So we really would be trading Beal + Brown for Okongwu + Hunter... We can do better.

Philly is stealing value here. Simmons is not a great asset and you think he's worth Beal?!?... This isnt 2018 anymore.
Silvie Lysandra
Starter
Posts: 2,269
And1: 542
Joined: May 22, 2007
   

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1795 » by Silvie Lysandra » Tue Jan 26, 2021 8:34 pm

pcbothwel wrote:
This is pretty bad. Bertans alone is worth an expiring (Snell) and a protected 2023 pick.

So we really would be trading Beal + Brown for Okongwu + Hunter... We can do better.

Philly is stealing value here. Simmons is not a great asset and you think he's worth Beal?!?... This isnt 2018 anymore.


Strongly disagree on Bertrans value. He may have that value to one of 4-5 teams in the NBA that are legit title contenders. To the rest of the league, I'm not sure they're really keen on paying that contract.

Similarly, I think other people (and GMs) are higher on Simmons and lower on Beal than we are.

If Philly is stealing value here, they can add in more picks/Maxey/Thybulle. Fairly easy to fix.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1796 » by Ruzious » Tue Jan 26, 2021 9:14 pm

Chaos Revenant wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
This is pretty bad. Bertans alone is worth an expiring (Snell) and a protected 2023 pick.

So we really would be trading Beal + Brown for Okongwu + Hunter... We can do better.

Philly is stealing value here. Simmons is not a great asset and you think he's worth Beal?!?... This isnt 2018 anymore.


Strongly disagree on Bertrans value. He may have that value to one of 4-5 teams in the NBA that are legit title contenders. To the rest of the league, I'm not sure they're really keen on paying that contract.

Similarly, I think other people (and GMs) are higher on Simmons and lower on Beal than we are.

If Philly is stealing value here, they can add in more picks/Maxey/Thybulle. Fairly easy to fix.


I think it WAS true last season that GM's were higher on Simmons than they were on Beal, but that's changed quite a bit since then. Beal has continued to improve and is the top scorer in the NBA with significantly better efficiency while Simmons has been a disappointment so far at a time in his career where it was expected he'd improve. Then again, Simmons started off poorly last season, as well. I'm doubtful he can flip the switch like he did last season.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,253
And1: 8,108
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1797 » by Dat2U » Tue Jan 26, 2021 9:39 pm

Chaos Revenant wrote:Returning to the Beal trade framework:

Code: Select all

Wizards out

Beal
Brown Jr.
Bertans

Wizards in:
Okongwu
Hunter
Korkmaz
Snell
Green
2023 PHLottery protected 1st

Hawks In:
Simmons
Brown Jr.

Hawks out:
Bogdanovic
Snell
Hunter
Okongwu
2021 2nd

76ers out:
Simmons
Korkmaz
Green
2023 protected first

76ers in:
Beal
Bogdanovic
Bertans


Why for the Wizards? Gets a solid return on Beal, while getting value out of the Bertans deal. TBJ might be overvalued here but the wing rotation gets even more crowded which doesn't help him.

Why for the 76ers:

While Simmons is a lot to give up, this deal solves their fit issues with Simmons and Embiid, while giving them a premier perimeter threat. Bertans is also a tremendous fit with his shooting, and the team has more than enough defense overall.

Why for the Hawks:

While Hunter is looking like a good player, Simmons is an all world defender, secondary playmaker, is locked down long term, and is young enough to fit their timeline. They also get to kick the tires on Brown Jr. in a far less crowded backcourt which will appreciate another multi-tool playmaker.

Now to try to answer objections, though I may be wrong in my analysis.

"Why don't the 76ers/Hawks cut the Wizards/76ers out?" - Atlanta's youth doesn't fit Philly's timeline, they would want someone who's ready to contend now. Similarly, the Wizards wouldn't flatly turn down Simmons for Beal straight up, but they're also not sure what kind of team they can build around him.

"The Hawks are giving up too much for Simmons!"

Possibly. Reddish would be a consideration, but it would need additional value to make it fair. Reddish + Okongwu for Simmons seems like an underpay.


I'm assuming a Philly fan came up with this because they come away for a fortune at the Hawks and Wizards expense.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,316
And1: 9,519
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1798 » by payitforward » Tue Jan 26, 2021 9:50 pm

nate33 wrote:
payitforward wrote:
prime1time wrote:What if the Wizards finish high in the lottery and use that pick to trade for a star? I.e., we trade get a high draft pick and we trade for Karl Anthony Towns?

Obviously, it'd take more than the pick to trade for Towns. How many players & picks do you want to give away to be able to pay Beal, Westbrook & Towns a combined $110m?

Let's say they'd take our pick plus Bertans & Bryant for Towns. Do you think they'd do that? Seems doubtful -- & especially with Bryant coming off a serious injury. & Bertans -- at least to this point -- looking substantially overpaid.

But... let's say they are willing. We'd have Westbrook, Beal, Towns, Rui, Deni & TBJ -- 6 guys -- for just over $124m.

The Luxury Tax might come in about $134m. So all we'd have to do is fill out the roster with 9 more players for $10m total.

Is that what you had in mind?

Any deal like that would have to be predicated on the team being willing to pay the luxtax for the final two seasons of Westbrook's contract.

Fair enough -- but... it's one thing to pay the luxury tax for 2 years & another to come up with a practical way to fill out that roster -- at any cost -- & wind up with a competitive team (since "go for it with Brad" is the premise), & I don't begin to see how that could be done.

I suppose we'd bring up Mathews & sign Bonga. We could bring Neto back as well. Those 3 guys are likely to be good value for what we have to pay them. But that still leaves us six guys short, & the roster so far isn't one that competes to reach the ECF:

Westbrook/Neto
Beal/Mathews
Deni/Brown
Rui/Bonga
Towns

The place to start is, as always, by recognizing reality. & the reality is that there is no alternative to rebuilding.

After many, many years of Ernie making mistake after mistake after mistake, rebuilding the Washington Wizards was always going to be a hard job. & our moves over the last months have made it harder.

John Wall's contract was a big problem. Trading it for Russ's contract increased the problem. Losing a R1 pick in the process hurt as well.

Re-signing Bertans for a fortune was also a mistake -- & it began at the trade deadline last year when we didn't take a R1 pick for him (presumably from the Celtics & presumably the #26 in November's draft).

Failing to mine this year's R2/undrafteds to stock the bench -- while instead signing Lopez, Gill & Neto -- was another unforced error.

Magical thinking isn't going to get us out of this mess.
Silvie Lysandra
Starter
Posts: 2,269
And1: 542
Joined: May 22, 2007
   

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1799 » by Silvie Lysandra » Tue Jan 26, 2021 11:34 pm

Dat2U wrote:I'm assuming a Philly fan came up with this because they come away for a fortune at the Hawks and Wizards expense.


really really think we're overvaluing Bertans on this board. He's slightly positive value, and only for a contender that doesn't have shooting. Maybe I'm biased because I never really wanted to resign him to begin with.

Similarly, I think we're drastically overvaluing TBJ in terms of what we would get for him. I think a lot of GMs would ask "If TBJ is such a great asset, why is he buried behind Ish Smith and Justin Robinson?" *We* might know the answer is "because Scott Brooks is a ****". But will an opposing GM accept that explanation, to the point where they'll give up significant value?

Anyway, Hunter and Okongwu are a good centerpiece for a Beal deal (I'd prefer that duo to Herro/Achiuwa, though the best move would be Beal for a top 5 pick and change). If Philly is not giving up enough, that's easy to fix.
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,333
And1: 2,873
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXIX 

Post#1800 » by pcbothwel » Wed Jan 27, 2021 12:19 am

Chaos Revenant wrote:
Dat2U wrote:I'm assuming a Philly fan came up with this because they come away for a fortune at the Hawks and Wizards expense.


really really think we're overvaluing Bertans on this board. He's slightly positive value, and only for a contender that doesn't have shooting. Maybe I'm biased because I never really wanted to resign him to begin with.

Similarly, I think we're drastically overvaluing TBJ in terms of what we would get for him. I think a lot of GMs would ask "If TBJ is such a great asset, why is he buried behind Ish Smith and Justin Robinson?" *We* might know the answer is "because Scott Brooks is a ****". But will an opposing GM accept that explanation, to the point where they'll give up significant value?

Anyway, Hunter and Okongwu are a good centerpiece for a Beal deal (I'd prefer that duo to Herro/Achiuwa, though the best move would be Beal for a top 5 pick and change). If Philly is not giving up enough, that's easy to fix.


So then why include TBJ is he's such an overrated prospect that nobody would give an asset for?
- Leave out the Bogdan/Bertans/Green for now. They all make the about the same salary so can be added if needed.
- Philly would also need a true PG off the bench, so another addition could be Ish Smith. Also fits salary structure.

It comes down to Philly. ASSUMING that ATL would give up Hunter & Okongwu for Simmons, then I would insist Philly throw in:
- Maxey: Adding Beal along with the emergence of Milton makes this an easy pill for them
- 2022 protected 1st: Because they traded their 2025 1st, this pick would unprotected in 2023.
Could also become 2 2nds depending on additional picks below:
- 25/26/27 Pick Swaps: If 2023 is unprotected then this may be enough, but may want a swap or 2.

Code: Select all

Wizards out
Beal

Wizards in:
Okongwu
Hunter
Snell

2022 PH Lottery protected 1st or 23 unprotected

Hawks In:
Simmons

Hawks out:
Snell
Hunter
Okongwu

76ers out:
Simmons
2022 protected first

76ers in:
Beal

Return to Washington Wizards