ImageImageImageImageImage

PG: Clippers at Knicks

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi

User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,103
And1: 22,650
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#101 » by RHODEY » Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:59 pm

WargamesX wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
shtolky wrote:
We have by far the easiest schedule left in the half (I think 16 games left). Toughest opponent might be Indy. We’re gonna be decent through mid March.


We lost to the kings, thunder, hornets etc. we are going to struggle against the bad teams too.


Yep, we still aren’t there. Especially talent wise, some of those crap teams have more talent and if they put effort in those games will be competitive. The kings being a great example. They suck but woke up for us and we had a tough game we then loss.

This summer between all our assets we should be able to make up that loss ground


KIngs more talented than us? I kinda dont see it.
whocares1
RealGM
Posts: 10,112
And1: 6,247
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#102 » by whocares1 » Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:59 pm

RJ’s emergence is lowkey the best part of this season.
User avatar
blueNorange
Knicks Forum Contrarian
Posts: 53,437
And1: 21,151
Joined: Jul 29, 2005
Location: mgmt: caa

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#103 » by blueNorange » Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:59 pm

look at this **** man, WIDE OPEN ... it's been a thing all season long.

FREE OBI.

Read on Twitter
?s=20
LOL Y U MAD THO?
Image
mitchell robinson has blocked zion williamson 3 times as of 7/6/19.
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 94,929
And1: 136,021
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#104 » by 3toheadmelo » Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:59 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter


Lmaoo so true man!!!

Soooo trueeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Image
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,447
And1: 30,537
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#105 » by Jeff Van Gully » Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:59 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter


Lmaoo so true man!!!

Soooo trueeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Bigg faxx
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,390
And1: 60,997
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#106 » by DOT » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:00 pm

whocares1 wrote:
K-DOT wrote:Quickley is in a Catch-22

If he plays well, to Thibs that means it's the right move to keep him on the bench

If he plays bad, then that's all the more reason to not start him and in fact is a reason to give him less minutes

Just a lose-lose situation.


I mean he has the keys to the team in the second unit, and he’s a floor spacer and an afterthought on the first unit. RJ, Randle, and Quickley are all most effective with the ball in their hands so for now it’s not crazy to let the kid run the second unit.

But at the same time, you don't have to only play them together

You stagger the lineups so they all play together for a good bit, but all have the opportunity to run the show, but all play together the first 6 and last 6 of each half

Limiting Quickley to just playing on the 2nd unit makes us worse overall as a team.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
J9Starks3
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,897
And1: 1,195
Joined: May 22, 2007
Location: CT
       

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#107 » by J9Starks3 » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:00 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter


Lmaoo so true man!!!

Soooo trueeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Even if the Nets won the chip, the back page of the NY Post would be IQ holding up the ROY trophy....
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,327
And1: 95,000
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#108 » by thebuzzardman » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:01 pm

HEZI wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
HEZI wrote:
That range actually has better success throughout history than 8th. Those 12-15 picks seem to usually land gold


I'd rather be picking 1-5


We still might with the Mavs pick :D


You have no idea how badly I want KP to be the Mav's Eddy Curry.
Image
Oscirus
RealGM
Posts: 13,529
And1: 9,531
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
       

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#109 » by Oscirus » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:01 pm

blueNorange wrote:look at this **** man, WIDE OPEN ... it's been a thing all season long.

FREE OBI.

Read on Twitter
?s=20

thats painful, you see this dude wide open just give up when he sees whats happening
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,739
And1: 57,025
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#110 » by robillionaire » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:02 pm

Oscirus wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
Oscirus wrote:On one hand starting quickley improves the starting lineup, on the other hand it would absolutely destroy our bench.
We were fine until that one sequence with jackson so im not gonna kill him too much on that fact


If Payton was the guy coming off the bench, it would destroy our bench. Payton automatically destroys any lineup he’s inserted in with his terrible skillset. If they made frank backup PG maybe they can salvage something

we'd have the same scoring issues with frank. barring an unforseen improvement with dsj, we're likely not gonna have the scoring off the bench to justify iq being a starter.


But don’t have the scoring in the starting lineup to justify him not being a starter. The starters are putrid offensively. Rather a bench struggles to score than the starting lineup
User avatar
NYK Dolemite
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,506
And1: 1,202
Joined: Jul 10, 2010
         

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#111 » by NYK Dolemite » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:03 pm

Tons of flights cancelled at O'Hare today. Wonder if Knicks get to Chicago on time for tomorrow's game with this truly monstrous storm stretching from here back near Chi.

My walk calmed me down, but I still feel like we didn't give ourselves the best chance to win. Even if you are wedded to starting Payton (which is insane, I'd rather start Bullock and Burks in the backcourt until Frank can get his ass off the eternal DL) you gotta cap him at like 12-15 minutes a game.

I really think Thibs is trying to tank while be competitive. It's a tough line to walk and it's probably total bull -- but waiting until there was 5:30 to go to put your best lineup out there was upsetting to me. Q was heroic in getting them back into the game, but Thibs just threw the game -- or any real shot to win -- by keeping him out there with Rivers -- who was clearly scared to shoot today, Obi -- who is just learning his game at this level of physical talent, Taj Gibson (insane he played 20 minutes -- i mean just insane), and Burks.

It's just really terrible coaching -- unless the plan is to concentrate on the individual progression of the young talent (IQ and RJ and Julius -- who looks old AF but is young for the purposes of planning a team for next 5 years, and Obi) while hampering them enough that we end up with a shot to get a lucky bounce of the ping pong ball that changes the team's trajectory from "interesting, no longer wretched" to "please use your cap space to sign me, Mr. Rose."

If that's the plan -- truly the plan from the FO down -- I totally get it. I just wish Thibs would call me up and tell me -- or just shoot me a text or a DM.

I don't want to dislike Thibs if this is strategic bad in-game managing.
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 8,099
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#112 » by WargamesX » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:03 pm

RHODEY wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
We lost to the kings, thunder, hornets etc. we are going to struggle against the bad teams too.


Yep, we still aren’t there. Especially talent wise, some of those crap teams have more talent and if they put effort in those games will be competitive. The kings being a great example. They suck but woke up for us and we had a tough game we then loss.

This summer between all our assets we should be able to make up that loss ground


KIngs more talented than us? I kinda dont see it.


They got a really good back court. Plus Holmes and Barnes arent scrubs. Even if they are not more talented they aren’t that far away and it still applies. If a team puts effort against us we it’s going to be competitive. The blow out for us is when opposing teams didn’t put the effort in.
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
J9Starks3
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,897
And1: 1,195
Joined: May 22, 2007
Location: CT
       

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#113 » by J9Starks3 » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:03 pm

K-DOT wrote:
whocares1 wrote:
K-DOT wrote:Quickley is in a Catch-22

If he plays well, to Thibs that means it's the right move to keep him on the bench

If he plays bad, then that's all the more reason to not start him and in fact is a reason to give him less minutes

Just a lose-lose situation.


I mean he has the keys to the team in the second unit, and he’s a floor spacer and an afterthought on the first unit. RJ, Randle, and Quickley are all most effective with the ball in their hands so for now it’s not crazy to let the kid run the second unit.

But at the same time, you don't have to only play them together

You stagger the lineups so they all play together for a good bit, but all have the opportunity to run the show, but all play together the first 6 and last 6 of each half

Limiting Quickley to just playing on the 2nd unit makes us worse overall as a team.


Except hes our closer, so hes not “only playing on the 2nd unit” as hes on the floor the entire 4th quarter...where you get RJ and Randle as well... what has to stop is the 12 minutes of payton followed by 12 minutes of IQ... honestly, I’d start IQ and play Frank for the last couple minutes of the 1st/3rd and first 3 or 4 minutes of the 2nd/4th quarter and let...but Thibs loves him some Elf...
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 94,929
And1: 136,021
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#114 » by 3toheadmelo » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:03 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,327
And1: 95,000
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#115 » by thebuzzardman » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:03 pm

It might be mean spirited, but it would be quite awesome if the Knicks got the #1 pick in the draft via the Mavs, KP was hurt on and off for the next 3 years, the Mavs don't resign him, and then KP kicks around the league from team to team, fat and angry, before retiring at the 10 year mark.

And everyone called him Fatzingis.

It's a little bit petty, but hey.
Image
8516knicks
General Manager
Posts: 8,410
And1: 6,345
Joined: May 18, 2017
   

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#116 » by 8516knicks » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:04 pm

RHODEY wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
snadler wrote:

And we might have drafted the best player in this draft at 25, what’s your point


Knicks are better off losing. They did, and I'm glad. They need a franchise player. Those are usually found in the draft - higher up. Not always, but most of the time.


We'll have 2 chances at a "not always" pick like khawi even if we make the palyoffs.


Looks like we're currently at #8/9 (Dallas) and #11 (Knicks) plus one good second rouunder and another also. Look like plenty of good prospects for a change around there even without the top 6 - like that Spanish big and Moody and even a 2nd round PG like McBride supposedly uber athletic and lockdown D. Here's hoping! 8-) :wink:
whocares1
RealGM
Posts: 10,112
And1: 6,247
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#117 » by whocares1 » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:05 pm

J9Starks3 wrote:
K-DOT wrote:
whocares1 wrote:
I mean he has the keys to the team in the second unit, and he’s a floor spacer and an afterthought on the first unit. RJ, Randle, and Quickley are all most effective with the ball in their hands so for now it’s not crazy to let the kid run the second unit.

But at the same time, you don't have to only play them together

You stagger the lineups so they all play together for a good bit, but all have the opportunity to run the show, but all play together the first 6 and last 6 of each half

Limiting Quickley to just playing on the 2nd unit makes us worse overall as a team.


Except hes our closer, so hes not “only playing on the 2nd unit” as hes on the floor the entire 4th quarter...where you get RJ and Randle as well... what has to stop is the 12 minutes of payton followed by 12 minutes of IQ... honestly, I’d start IQ and play Frank for the last couple minutes of the 1st/3rd and first 3 or 4 minutes of the 2nd/4th quarter and let...but Thibs loves him some Elf...


Exactly. He isn’t only playing with the second unit, but he’s most effective playing with them because he’s the first option when he’s playing with the bench. He will be Randle’s caddie in the first unit.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,327
And1: 95,000
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#118 » by thebuzzardman » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:05 pm

Orange Mamba wrote:
Read on Twitter


Spoiler:
Image


NEVER gets old :D
Image
User avatar
Riot Randolph
RealGM
Posts: 10,995
And1: 9,572
Joined: Nov 28, 2011
     

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#119 » by Riot Randolph » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:06 pm

Angryfatboy wrote:Image

Rose in the second unit ..idllove it
Formerly Knicks85

Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 8,099
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: PG: Clippers at Knicks 

Post#120 » by WargamesX » Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:06 pm

NYK Dolemite wrote:Tons of flights cancelled at O'Hare today. Wonder if Knicks get to Chicago on time for tomorrow's game with this truly monstrous storm stretching from here back near Chi.

My walk calmed me down, but I still feel like we didn't give ourselves the best chance to win. Even if you are wedded to starting Payton (which is insane, I'd rather start Bullock and Burks in the backcourt until Frank can get his ass off the eternal DL) you gotta cap him at like 12-15 minutes a game.

I really think Thibs is trying to tank while be competitive. It's a tough line to walk and it's probably total bull -- but waiting until there was 5:30 to go to put your best lineup out there was upsetting to me. Q was heroic in getting them back into the game, but Thibs just threw the game -- or any real shot to win -- by keeping him out there with Rivers -- who was clearly scared to shoot today, Obi -- who is just learning his game at this level of physical talent, Taj Gibson (insane he played 20 minutes -- i mean just insane), and Burks.

It's just really terrible coaching -- unless the plan is to concentrate on the individual progression of the young talent (IQ and RJ and Julius -- who looks old AF but is young for the purposes of planning a team for next 5 years, and Obi) while hampering them enough that we end up with a shot to get a lucky bounce of the ping pong ball that changes the team's trajectory from "interesting, no longer wretched" to "please use your cap space to sign me, Mr. Rose."

If that's the plan -- truly the plan from the FO down -- I totally get it. I just wish Thibs would call me up and tell me -- or just shoot me a text or a DM.

I don't want to dislike Thibs if this is strategic bad in-game managing.


Even if this is true... You can’t operate on this conspiracy stuff :nonono: it’ll make you too zen to his mess ups :meditate: and no one will ever know :dontknow:
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7

Return to New York Knicks