76ciology wrote:HardenToSixers wrote:If you buy a stock at 20 and it rises to 100 and then crashes to 1, you don’t blame buying it at 20, you blame not selling it at 80+.
It didn’t rose to 100 though. It only had the upside to be 100.
It’s 20 with an upside to be 100 and it’s now less than 20 because it has no upside to be 100.
Your definition is more applicable to maybe Derrick Rose when he won MVP.
I’m not sure what you mean. He looked absolutely incredible his first year playing. He was valued as a franchise building block. Yeah he struggled in the Celtics series but at that point in his career nobody was going to say he didn’t have sky high trade value because of that.
If your point is that he already had a great reputation as that before being drafted, then fine, but that still makes him the right pick over anybody else after he proved that on the court.
I think you are completely underselling what his value would have been league wide in the offseason after his first year playing. Just because we wasn’t on the market doesn’t mean he didn’t have great value.
If you want to haggle over the “value” he had, if a stock rises from 20 to 60, that’s still tripling your investment. If you are trying to say his league wide value didn’t increase in the couple years after we drafted him, I think you’re just being disingenuous.



















