Texas Chuck wrote:2nd year guy who was a known project when drafted having some struggles. Not sure what is thread worthy about this honestly.
Its very much like our local news. Bad news grabs peoples attention/ratings ( replies )

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Texas Chuck wrote:2nd year guy who was a known project when drafted having some struggles. Not sure what is thread worthy about this honestly.
Ball4life32 wrote:Roger Murdock wrote:Was it worth the risk? There were a bunch of really solid prospects still on the board that are completely outplaying him.
Reddish sucked in college and guys who don’t show feel for the game, passing, shooting, or a handle rarely just develop one.
Reddish is an idea of a player rather than a player himself. I wouldn’t have taken him in the top-30. Worth the risk is Cavs swinging and missing on KPJ at 30 not taking a known bum at 10 hoping he’d stop being bad cause he’s tall. Being super athletic really isn’t that adventurous on offense if you can slash or score inside.
Reddish last 21 games to end his rookie season
14.6 ppg in 28.5 mpg on 60 TS%
47.0 FG%
41.7 3pt% (over 5+ attempts)
82.7 FT%
I know it isn’t a huge sample but bums who can’t shoot, dribble, or have any feel for the game aren’t doing what he did to end the season & a lot of hawks fans were extremely high on him as was the gm. Now Reddish has absolutely reverted back to his early rookie season tendencies where he really struggled (8 ppg on 43 TS% in his first 35 games) but a lot of it has to do with his abysmal 3pt%......(he shot a good bit higher in college and last year + he is a good FT%) I don’t think he’s as bad as shooter as we’ve seen but we will see.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.
The_Hater wrote:Ball4life32 wrote:Roger Murdock wrote:Was it worth the risk? There were a bunch of really solid prospects still on the board that are completely outplaying him.
Reddish sucked in college and guys who don’t show feel for the game, passing, shooting, or a handle rarely just develop one.
Reddish is an idea of a player rather than a player himself. I wouldn’t have taken him in the top-30. Worth the risk is Cavs swinging and missing on KPJ at 30 not taking a known bum at 10 hoping he’d stop being bad cause he’s tall. Being super athletic really isn’t that adventurous on offense if you can slash or score inside.
Reddish last 21 games to end his rookie season
14.6 ppg in 28.5 mpg on 60 TS%
47.0 FG%
41.7 3pt% (over 5+ attempts)
82.7 FT%
I know it isn’t a huge sample but bums who can’t shoot, dribble, or have any feel for the game aren’t doing what he did to end the season & a lot of hawks fans were extremely high on him as was the gm. Now Reddish has absolutely reverted back to his early rookie season tendencies where he really struggled (8 ppg on 43 TS% in his first 35 games) but a lot of it has to do with his abysmal 3pt%......(he shot a good bit higher in college and last year + he is a good FT%) I don’t think he’s as bad as shooter as we’ve seen but we will see.
Since he was always touted as a shooter, one has to think there’s improvement coming at some point. But his college 3FG numbers were poor, his rookie numbers were poor (even including the 21 game hit streak) and his current numbers are going the wrong direction. At some point he has to just make them.
I remember thinking that at worst, Nik Stauskas would be a dead eye 3 point shooter. He made them in college at over 44% and he made his FT’s at every level. And his modest career average of 35.3% just made him unemployed. Reddish is at 31.5% for his career right now.
limbo wrote:...he's costing the Hawks a lot of games. That's all.
Looking forward to Hawks fan telling me how he's not and rationalize it based on his 'superstar potential on both ends'.
The Hawks might have to make a decision soon because there's a lot of cooks in the kitchen rn and Reddish needs A LOT of time, focus and opportunity to develop on offense... They might be forced to choose between gambling on his potential moving forward or trying to compete around Trae/JC and vets... Right now they're trying to do both and the results are stuck in the middle.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
og15 wrote:Spud2nique wrote:limbo wrote:And he's costing the Hawks a lot of games. That's all.
Looking forward to Hawks fan telling me how he's not and rationalize it based on his 'superstar potential on both ends'.
Wait till next Wednesday before you talk. He’s got another shot against you guys! He’s inconsistent yes but his ceiling is higher than Luka.
The guy shot 36/33 in college while not scoring that much, same thing in the NBA so far. Saying his ceiling is higher than Luka is just meaningless, that's one of those fake ceilings that some fans create.
What is his actual realistic ceiling, not the imaginary, "if he drastically improves at every single aspect of basketball" ceiling?
The_Hater wrote: Right now is offense is closer to this level: https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/t/tskitni01.html
Spud2nique wrote:limbo wrote:And he's costing the Hawks a lot of games. That's all.
Looking forward to Hawks fan telling me how he's not and rationalize it based on his 'superstar potential on both ends'.
Wait till next Wednesday before you talk. He’s got another shot against you guys! He’s inconsistent yes but his ceiling is higher than Luka.
I have nothing against the guy or the Hawks, none of this is personal in any way.Spud2nique wrote:og15 wrote:Spud2nique wrote:
Wait till next Wednesday before you talk. He’s got another shot against you guys! He’s inconsistent yes but his ceiling is higher than Luka.
The guy shot 36/33 in college while not scoring that much, same thing in the NBA so far. Saying his ceiling is higher than Luka is just meaningless, that's one of those fake ceilings that some fans create.
What is his actual realistic ceiling, not the imaginary, "if he drastically improves at every single aspect of basketball" ceiling?
First off let me say I respect your Clipper nation and actively root for them, specially over the likes of the scrubs and the fakers and such. Having said that, I do disagree that I’m creating an “ imaginary ceiling” for him. I put him in the same boat as a Marvin Bagley as far as talent, it’s their and the potential is high due to the skills he possesses, I’ve seen some of the flashes and I haven’t seen them from may players and I’ve been watching for 39 years or so. I’m not saying Cam is Michael Jordan, but he’s a player that could be a superstar someday but right now his consistency is preventing him from even demanding time as a 6th man or even floor time period. A lot of super young guys with big time skills too a few years and I directly liken this aspect of Cam’s growing pains to those of Tmac from 20 years ago. Took him a while too.
KembaWalker wrote:i remember going into the draft i looked back at his high school/aau stats from various events and they were pretty mediocre. still not sure how this dude got the hype he did, as far as i can tell he's never actually been good at basketball (relatively of course)