K-DOT wrote:cgf wrote:K-DOT wrote:He wasn't.
...you assume.
Do you know how much worse that looks if we did draft him for "upside"?
Stop trying to make it seem like Rose has a hidden agenda and is playing 4d chess. He took the kid he thought would be best right away, and it flopped. You don't draft a kid who turns 23 in his rookie year for "upside", you draft him cause you think he has the highest floor
People keep trying to retroactively make this about upside. Nobody ever said Obi has the highest upside and he'd be a developmental guy before we drafted him, or even after we drafted him but before the season started
Now we're retconning it because he looks so much more raw than we thought. Just say we were wrong about him having a high floor and move on.
Nice strawman, but no, nobody's trying to make the FO look like geniuses for this pick. I disliked it then & still dislike it...and anyone who thought he was going to be plug n play was obviously wrong, even without hindsight...but I don't see why I should assume that the FO was obsessed with his age as you are.
His being 22 doesn't mean he's the finished product or that he's already reached his potential, so why -- other than this organization's history of incompetence -- should I assume that those were the FO's reasons for picking him when a much simpler answer would be that they didn't care if he was raw because they thought that he would be better than the guys drafted right after him in his prime?
Which, if they did think that, isn't a good look now & wasn't a good look then. But it does make more sense than assuming they drafted a kid that they hadn't scouted.
























