WolfAddict wrote:thinktank wrote:Ultimately, Abe’s point is that Wolves coaches should not be held accountable.
And I disagree.
I don't agree with a lot of what Abe is saying, but this is just plain wrong and not needed.
He's said a number of times that the coaching staff are all to blame to a certain degree, so to say otherwise is either disingenuous or baiting for the sake of it.
 
Yeah. Don't really know what's so disturbing about what I've written. 
1) Saunders is not a good coach. 
2) Fire him if you want. It's inevitable he'll be fired. I'm not even arguing he doesn't deserve to be fired. 
3) It's not about one coach. The Wolves have EIGHT coaches for a reason. They all have input. Just moving one over a chair in the interim role... ok. But the same guys will be making the decisions they're already making. Only we'll have a new guy to address the media about it.  
4) Wolves fans tend to blame coaches A LOT over the years... when it's a players league and they have so much more impact on wins and losses. But I guess it's easier to hold out hope in the players and that the the situation is not entirely dire. So if the argument is that Russell or Towns or Beasley or other important player has tuned out Saunders... ok. Connecting with the star players is probably the most important part of the gig. Having Russell on the same page as the coach WILL make the Wolves a better team. The question is whether an interim guy has any more clout than the super green Saunders?
So fire away. My point is that the team still sucks without Towns out there... and maybe even with him.