Lunartic wrote:
Well we don't want your head to spin,
Speak for yourself
Moderators: HomoSapien, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, RedBulls23

Lunartic wrote:
Well we don't want your head to spin,

"1. As much as he was raved about defensively, I have been a little underwhelmed from an eye test. To me, he seems to run hot and cold. Yes, there are times when you see him get in a stance and lock down, it's not an ability issue. I see it as his motor is not running all the time. That may be because he is overthinking things or just getting up to speed."Brothaman33 wrote:A few thoughts...
1. As much as he was raved about defensively, I have been a little underwhelmed from an eye test. To me, he seems to run hot and cold. Yes, there are times when you see him get in a stance and lock down, it's not an ability issue. I see it as his motor is not running all the time. That may be because he is overthinking things or just getting up to speed.
2. The travels out of the triple threat are beginning to become nauseating. A few times to begin the season, fine, you're a rookie. This happens every game. Please find the issue and correct it.
3. A few have mentioned the slow release on the jumper, but that doesn't bother me as much because when he shoots 3's he hasn't had trouble being blocked and picks his spots well. He gets terrific elevation on his mid range, 1 handed shots so the release isn't a problem there either. I would like to see him take it to the hole a bit more and begin to learn about what he can and can't do to get easy buckets, avoid charges and get better at the rim.
4. I think we have to settle in with him. The curve is gonna be steep. Alot if rookies who are stars you can see right away. I don't see that with him yet. How good he gets is going to be all on the staff and how bad he actually wants to be a go-to "I believe I'm the best on the floor" player.
Settle in.

fleet wrote:He’s literally the youngest player in the NBA. That went straight to the League with no preparation and very little college ball. The negative hot takes re: his future are unconvincing.

mlitney01 wrote:fleet wrote:He’s literally the youngest player in the NBA. That went straight to the League with no preparation and very little college ball. The negative hot takes re: his future are unconvincing.
I think Poku is the youngest, but I agree with your sentiment.
fleet wrote:mlitney01 wrote:fleet wrote:He’s literally the youngest player in the NBA. That went straight to the League with no preparation and very little college ball. The negative hot takes re: his future are unconvincing.
I think Poku is the youngest, but I agree with your sentiment.
Poku was sent away. Pat is now it.
fleet wrote:mlitney01 wrote:fleet wrote:He’s literally the youngest player in the NBA. That went straight to the League with no preparation and very little college ball. The negative hot takes re: his future are unconvincing.
I think Poku is the youngest, but I agree with your sentiment.
Poku was sent away. Pat is now it.
Everyone compares him to Kawhi, so I was just addressing that comparison. I could see PWill eventually becoming relatively Kawhi-like offensively, and while I definitely think he'll for sure be a plus defender, I just don't see him ever becoming a true lockdown type unless his footspeed increases dramatically.fleet wrote:^^^^^ I doubt people thought rookie Kawhi was gonna be Kawhi either. Not that I think Pat will be a Kawhi myself, because who can ever be that? If he falls short he can still be reaaaaalllly good. Or really mediocre. Rookie Kawhi was I think a year older than Pat, and he had more experience, and their rookie stats are really close. Check it out. Moral of the story is, pick a superstar that had a better rookie year to derate Pat. It would work better.
cjbulls wrote:fleet wrote:mlitney01 wrote:
I think Poku is the youngest, but I agree with your sentiment.
Poku was sent away. Pat is now it.
Why should we care that Pat is the youngest when there are a bunch of top pick rookies all within that same age range? I remember Ball is like 4 days older. We need to stop pretending he has much more basketball ability in him simply because he was born in August and Anthony Edwards was born in July or whatever.
mlitney01 wrote:cjbulls wrote:fleet wrote:Poku was sent away. Pat is now it.
Why should we care that Pat is the youngest when there are a bunch of top pick rookies all within that same age range? I remember Ball is like 4 days older. We need to stop pretending he has much more basketball ability in him simply because he was born in August and Anthony Edwards was born in July or whatever.
Ball and Edwards weren't available when we picked. They shouldn't be in the equation when deciding if we selected the best player. I don't watch a lot of NBA games outside of the Bulls, but I'd be curious if any other rookies are looking better than Patrick but in the same age range. Haliburton is looking really good but he's a few years older.
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
nomorezorro wrote:people have different development curves, and age and experience both play a factor. i think it's reasonable to suggest that a guy who played a year as a reserve in college is on a different track than a guy who has, since adolescence, been actively positioned as the centerpiece of a team, even if they're the same age.
i also think it's fair to point out that theoretical growth capability is worth a lot less than actual skill/performance, but still. the facts surrounding patrick williams have not changed that much since he was drafted...11 weeks ago. it's frustrating that he started off better than a lot of people expected and then tapered off a bit, but that doesn't make it reasonable to say "why isn't he getting better???" about a 19 year old who is 1.5 months into his professional career


DASMACKDOWN wrote:
cjbulls wrote:nomorezorro wrote:people have different development curves, and age and experience both play a factor. i think it's reasonable to suggest that a guy who played a year as a reserve in college is on a different track than a guy who has, since adolescence, been actively positioned as the centerpiece of a team, even if they're the same age.
i also think it's fair to point out that theoretical growth capability is worth a lot less than actual skill/performance, but still. the facts surrounding patrick williams have not changed that much since he was drafted...11 weeks ago. it's frustrating that he started off better than a lot of people expected and then tapered off a bit, but that doesn't make it reasonable to say "why isn't he getting better???" about a 19 year old who is 1.5 months into his professional career
He was a top 20-30 recruit depending on the service, not some unknown. He played 22.5 mpg in the ACC, for a top 5 team. And he got to practice with an extremely talented roster that featured other nba players like Vassell.
I don’t think many people are questioning why he isn’t getting better. The scouting report is out on him. It appears to me that he’s slowly trying to adapt. It’s a work in progress.