The Sebastian Express wrote:d-train wrote:If Blazers decided to trade Lillard, we would get very close to nothing. Sixers would be less willing to trade Simmons for Lillard than they would trade him for Harden. Every team you offered Lillard to would start the discussion by taking at least their best player off the table. Less than a handful of teams could pay Lillard's salary and the massive luxury taxes they would owe. Blazers fans would be in shock over how little we would get by trading Lillard. The only way we would get anything would be by taking huge untradable contracts. Lillard would yield nothing, but we could get some likely bad draft picks by relieving teams of unwanted financial burdens.
I appreciate that you say this a year after Russell Westbrook on a worse contract, with a history of injuries got four first round picks.
They didn't get 4 1st round picks. Rockets and OKC exchanged bad contracts. Rockets got a less bad contract and kicked in 2 protected firsts and 2 swaps. Rockets didn't pay a lot to get Westbrook, but they got even less back when they traded him. I'm not sure what your point is, unless you are just mistaken about what was traded.














I was just thinking of a deal that would work for both teams, but neither team has to make a deal. Also maybe Portland finds something better. Do you think they'll try to retain Trent next season?