Over The Top: The James Borrego Thread
Moderators: JDR720, Diop, fatlever, yosemiteben, BigSlam
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
- yosemiteben
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 20,283
- And1: 13,634
- Joined: Mar 20, 2013
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
Sure, I get why you and others might not love the rotation. I don't necessarily agree with some of the critiques and I definitely don't think it's worth firing JB over.
I genuinely don't think rotation changes would have added more to our W column.
I genuinely don't think rotation changes would have added more to our W column.
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,369
- And1: 4,946
- Joined: Apr 14, 2010
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
JB's rotation expirements have literally cost us games though. Hell, guys in the game threads have called them out the moment they touched the floor.
Its not an exaggeration
Its not an exaggeration
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
- amcoolio
- Hornets Forum John Hancock
- Posts: 16,855
- And1: 9,219
- Joined: Jun 14, 2004
- Location: Servant to lord Bargnani
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
DY_nasty wrote:JB's rotation expirements have literally cost us games though. Hell, guys in the game threads have called them out the moment they touched the floor.
Its not an exaggeration
I'm fairly certain we ran a Monk/Rozier/Martin Twins/Biz lineup that cost us 10 points instantly in 4 minutes in the 2nd quarter and we lost by 10, a month ago
I don't support domestic violence. Thanks Miles
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,664
- And1: 1,480
- Joined: Sep 28, 2015
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
It's been a couple of weeks since I called for Coach Borrego's head. Since then, LaMelo Ball has continued his breakout, and Malik Monk returned to the rotation, beginning on January 27. Now the team is profiled in the New York Times, with a focus on the seven coaches. So Coach Borrego, keep up the good work and go with the flow!
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/10/sports/basketball/nba-hornets-charlotte-lamelo-ball.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/10/sports/basketball/nba-hornets-charlotte-lamelo-ball.html
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
- BigSlam
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 51,164
- And1: 8,358
- Joined: Jul 01, 2005
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
Best adjustment he’s made was cutting his rotation down from 10 guys to 7 main guys and some bit mins to 1 or 2 others IMO.
B B M F 'ers
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
- SWedd523
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,259
- And1: 5,165
- Joined: Jul 07, 2009
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
Almost like he wanted to spread minutes around a little bit early season because dudes hadn't played in so long and/or were rookies and/or coming off injury/China flu
As the season has progressed and guys have established themselves in the pecking order, the rotation has developed accordingly.
Signs of a good coach IMO
As the season has progressed and guys have established themselves in the pecking order, the rotation has developed accordingly.
Signs of a good coach IMO
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
- BigSlam
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 51,164
- And1: 8,358
- Joined: Jul 01, 2005
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
SWedd523 wrote:Almost like he wanted to spread minutes around a little bit early season because dudes hadn't played in so long and/or were rookies and/or coming off injury/China flu
Very good point, and that might be right - he might just have been easing guys into the season. Some of the statements he made early on about an extended rotation had me worried though. Good to see he seems to have pivoted from that though.
SWedd523 wrote:Signs of a good coach IMO
Totally agree - having a coach who believes in his process and enforces it is important but a coach who can also pivot and know when to do so is gold.
B B M F 'ers
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,369
- And1: 4,946
- Joined: Apr 14, 2010
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
i..... don't think that a shortened rotation has anything to do with some grand scheme guys
more likely our injuries than anything else lol
and rozier/graham both getting hurt is what forced lamelo into the starting lineup - a move that should've happened weeks ago without injuries to prompt it.
more likely our injuries than anything else lol
and rozier/graham both getting hurt is what forced lamelo into the starting lineup - a move that should've happened weeks ago without injuries to prompt it.
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
- SWedd523
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,259
- And1: 5,165
- Joined: Jul 07, 2009
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
DY_nasty wrote:i..... don't think that a shortened rotation has anything to do with some grand scheme guys
more likely our injuries than anything else lol
and rozier/graham both getting hurt is what forced lamelo into the starting lineup - a move that should've happened weeks ago without injuries to prompt it.
Wait, what?
Wouldn't guys getting hurt extend the rotation, not limit it?
Less dudes are getting PT than before, despite injuries
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,369
- And1: 4,946
- Joined: Apr 14, 2010
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
i think you're kinda blurring two points there. regarding lamelo starting - its due to injury (and its still imo dumb to start two PGs when you only have two PGs ready to go). and it shouldn't have taken that.SWedd523 wrote:DY_nasty wrote:i..... don't think that a shortened rotation has anything to do with some grand scheme guys
more likely our injuries than anything else lol
and rozier/graham both getting hurt is what forced lamelo into the starting lineup - a move that should've happened weeks ago without injuries to prompt it.
Wait, what?
Wouldn't guys getting hurt extend the rotation, not limit it?
Less dudes are getting PT than before, despite injuries
and for the second, borrego still has wild trust issues. if pj gets hurt that just means a twin gets to guard a center lol. he's not playing guys he's not comfortable with. that's why the rotation is shortening. not sure why us losing guys would mean the rotation would extend.
and that's even if they've proven to be reliable for situations and matchups. borrego is more comfortable watching our wings get mauled than trusting biyombo to stop a run based around physicality inside.
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
- BigSlam
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 51,164
- And1: 8,358
- Joined: Jul 01, 2005
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
SWedd523 wrote:DY_nasty wrote:i..... don't think that a shortened rotation has anything to do with some grand scheme guys
more likely our injuries than anything else lol
and rozier/graham both getting hurt is what forced lamelo into the starting lineup - a move that should've happened weeks ago without injuries to prompt it.
Wait, what?
Wouldn't guys getting hurt extend the rotation, not limit it?
Less dudes are getting PT than before, despite injuries
Yup. We’re seeing guys get 32+mins and even 35+mins now.
That wasn’t happening at all before.
B B M F 'ers
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,369
- And1: 4,946
- Joined: Apr 14, 2010
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
i'm confused.
he's running guys into the ground because he won't even trust himself to play guys who've proven they can be good in situations/matchups when his go-to players are out. Cody plays 40 minutes (reasonable) but Biz doesn't touch the floor once (huh?).
stuff like that doesn't add up at all. it just kinda doubles back to having tools and not using them while at the same time doubling down on what makes him comfortable.
he's running guys into the ground because he won't even trust himself to play guys who've proven they can be good in situations/matchups when his go-to players are out. Cody plays 40 minutes (reasonable) but Biz doesn't touch the floor once (huh?).
stuff like that doesn't add up at all. it just kinda doubles back to having tools and not using them while at the same time doubling down on what makes him comfortable.
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
- SWedd523
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,259
- And1: 5,165
- Joined: Jul 07, 2009
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
DY_nasty wrote:i'm confused.
he's running guys into the ground because he won't even trust himself to play guys who've proven they can be good in situations/matchups when his go-to players are out. Cody plays 40 minutes (reasonable) but Biz doesn't touch the floor once (huh?).
stuff like that doesn't add up at all. it just kinda doubles back to having tools and not using them while at the same time doubling down on what makes him comfortable.
Were clearly talking about two different things
Slam and others were complaining early season because like 10 dudes were getting minutes and guys weren't getting enough time to establish rhythm.
As the season has progressed, that rotation has steadily gotten smaller, the main guys are seeing their minutes go up, and the bit players are getting spot minutes.
Slam applauded that
I said I believe it was indicative of him wanting to ease the entire team back into game shape (for a variety of reasons) and, since it appears to have been a smart move, that it shows good coaching by Borrego.
You're talking about Melo and two PG lineups lol
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
- BigSlam
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 51,164
- And1: 8,358
- Joined: Jul 01, 2005
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
I'm still not overly fond of his sub patterns at times though. He seems pretty rigid with them and will sometimes sit the hot hand Vs keeping them in a little longer.
He has proven to be willing to sit guys during a game who are sucking on any given night though, so that's good.
He has proven to be willing to sit guys during a game who are sucking on any given night though, so that's good.
B B M F 'ers
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,369
- And1: 4,946
- Joined: Apr 14, 2010
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
SWedd523 wrote:DY_nasty wrote:i'm confused.
he's running guys into the ground because he won't even trust himself to play guys who've proven they can be good in situations/matchups when his go-to players are out. Cody plays 40 minutes (reasonable) but Biz doesn't touch the floor once (huh?).
stuff like that doesn't add up at all. it just kinda doubles back to having tools and not using them while at the same time doubling down on what makes him comfortable.
Were clearly talking about two different things
Slam and others were complaining early season because like 10 dudes were getting minutes and guys weren't getting enough time to establish rhythm.
As the season has progressed, that rotation has steadily gotten smaller, the main guys are seeing their minutes go up, and the bit players are getting spot minutes.
Slam applauded that
I said I believe it was indicative of him wanting to ease the entire team back into game shape (for a variety of reasons) and, since it appears to have been a smart move, that it shows good coaching by Borrego.
You're talking about Melo and two PG lineups lol
yeah and i don't agree there at all
if he was conscious of getting people into game shape or was attuned to conditioning then he wouldn't be absolutely clueless with how monk looks absolutely gassed or with how PJ could barely pretend to be active after returning.
the rotation shortening and minutes shooting up is not some plan playing out. he's losing his favorites and forced to lean harder on the guys he trusts. its just that straightforward imo
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,471
- And1: 4,156
- Joined: Mar 11, 2004
- Location: PA
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
I still don’t trust he won’t move LaMelo back to the bench when Devonte returns. JB has taken a PJ Washington sized step back for me this season.
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,875
- And1: 1,372
- Joined: Jun 28, 2017
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
After every single loss these quotes are guaranteed:
"Give them a ton of credit."
"I'll look at the film."
"We'll keep getting better."
Where are you guys with JB right now? He just seems to be a very solid developmental assistant coach, while his in-game coaching leaves A LOT to be desired.
"Give them a ton of credit."
"I'll look at the film."
"We'll keep getting better."
Where are you guys with JB right now? He just seems to be a very solid developmental assistant coach, while his in-game coaching leaves A LOT to be desired.
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
-
- Senior
- Posts: 744
- And1: 319
- Joined: Jun 13, 2014
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
CuseMayne wrote:After every single loss these quotes are guaranteed:
"Give them a ton of credit."
"I'll look at the film."
"We'll keep getting better."
Where are you guys with JB right now? He just seems to be a very solid developmental assistant coach, while his in-game coaching leaves A LOT to be desired.
TBH given how small this team is, I don't think the defense is fixable unless all of our players are clairvoyant on defense. I think it's a choice between a lay up line and giving up threes.
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,471
- And1: 4,156
- Joined: Mar 11, 2004
- Location: PA
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
CuseMayne wrote:Where are you guys with JB right now? He just seems to be a very solid developmental assistant coach, while his in-game coaching leaves A LOT to be desired.
I'm with you on this actually. I have lost confidence that JB has had enough coaching experience to lead this team to a playoff series win. I think we could get into the playoffs under him but not win a series. I don't think he has the right feel for momentum and he gets stubborn with his rotations regardless of how the game is going sometimes.
However, I think he will get a pass as long as we make the playoffs because the bar is set so damn low and everyone knows our roster lacks size to an alarming degree.
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
- yosemiteben
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 20,283
- And1: 13,634
- Joined: Mar 20, 2013
Re: Not Van Damme: The James Borrego Thread
I don't really understand the "no feel for the game" take. We have been an excellent closing team this season.