lazybatman wrote:So we finally agree? 53 / 49.. Whatever.. Neither are great man.tamaraw08 wrote:After the first 3 games or so, I stated that it's foolish to compare him to Rondo bec they have very different strengths. Some "analysts" figured that bec they have the same built, that maybe he'll contribute the same way.![]()
The same "analysts" kept bringing the fact that he shot 38.5% from 3 when he NEVER shot above 36% before that, also rolled my eyes when they mentioned Marc shot great last season too. Schroder is not a great passer and doesn't have great court vision but I just don't look at 3pt shooting and simple FG% but look at other stats which for me is a little more accurate.
His TS % is at 53.8% which was helped by his pretty good FT rate at 32.4% has helped him and this team even if he is currently horrendous at the 3pt line, just a point of comparison, Rondo's career TS% is 49%, But again, they have very different strengths.
Neither are great but you can call 49% bad or below average while 53TS% is not that horrible esp if you consider Kemba currently has 45.8 TS% or Lonzo hit 51.7% last season. Caruso had 52.5 TS% last season but thank God didn't focus on that stat and look at other facets like defense. Your original point was Schroder doesn't make great decisions as a PG, and I AGREE, I also agree that Vogel and staff needs better sets too, but come one man, I pointed out that his turnovers are not that many per 100 possessions but you shifted to him not being a great passer/assist man... then shifted again to not being a good shooter pointing to FG% which could be misleading IMO.
It's been an interesting discussion and I applaud your classy demeanor of not resorting to name calling when we disagree.
