2020-21 NBA Season Discussion

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1101 » by bondom34 » Sat Feb 13, 2021 7:33 am

bondom34 wrote:
penbeast0 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:...
Honestly, other than Oladipo (he was only there a year) and Lillard think every guy on any of these teams has had some sort of irrational slander at some point.


What do you consider an "irrational" slander? Is Harden not working hard on defense or off ball an "irrational" slander? Is Kawhi Leonard taking a lot of games off "irrational?" I agree that sometimes you get some crazy views and the more takes you get on a player the higher likelihood that some of them will be strange, but sometimes the takes are legit criticism as well . . . "yes, this person is a great player but . . . "

Harden is a playoff choker who can't win under pressure. Only good because he gets foul calls, otherwise he's just a nobody.

Kawhi has been on stacked teams his whole career, only won b/c his teams are always incredibly deep. Only won in 14 because of the Spurs system and in 19 because the Warriors were injured and the Raptors team depth (they had a winning record without him).

Etc.

The Harden takes are definitely really out there, he's been labeled a ton of things that aren't fair (and I'm saying this as someone who's not a fan of his in general). Pretty much all these guys barring those two have had it that I can recall in some form. Kawhi's has been maybe weaker, but still there at times. Generally, if you open the general forum or most forms of social media and anything around most of these players it's pretty prominent. Seemed like it mainly came up here when it went to Curry.

Heck Luka's catching a ton of it now too in his 3rd year. AD's not a winner, Lebron carried him. But Lebron's not a winner and needs stacked teams for a title shot. Jokic had the goalposts shifted so many times from he can't get his team to the playoffs to can't get them out of the first round to now can't get them to a finals. Gobert is played off the court in the playoffs, Embiid injury prone and not a winner, Simmons by some people's accounts may be a fringe starter. And those guys are some of the bunch who take some of the "least" criticism relative.

Edit: And this is before getting to guys like Paul George or Westbrook. I still see stuff about Westbrook that's pretty irrational and has been for years and PG can't say anything without taking heat and despite having overall a decent playoff record both of them get no pass while a more liked star gets one. Most social media isn't rational and acts as if nothing happened before yesterday. Like, heck I'll make a Playoff P joke but he's overall been very good and people act like he's been a poor playoff performer and ignore Westbrook's career.

As I said, it's why I took a little social media break, this subforum is a bit better but on the whole... NBA discourse is kind of bad.

Self quoting myself here, and more a general thought, but looking at the GB and realizing some of it (ie the thread about Shaq trash talking Rudy Gobert) is even coming from guys who are supposed to be promoting the game. Gobert's one of the guys who gets some unfair treatment too (and edited in, but Westbrook though he fell off now, CP3, and George are a few of the worse ones in recent history too).

It's not only social media, but even media in general is a weird problem in ways. Other sports I don't see this in (social media amplifies the bad/hot take nature of it, and is worse, but media promoting it just is bad too).
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Inspektor1312
Pro Prospect
Posts: 852
And1: 1,498
Joined: Feb 02, 2018
Location: Србија
   

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1102 » by Inspektor1312 » Sat Feb 13, 2021 12:45 pm

bondom34 wrote:...

As I said, it's why I took a little social media break, this subforum is a bit better but on the whole... NBA discourse is kind of bad.


Oh no, people on the internet are critiquing NBA players, how awful and inconsiderate!
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,828
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1103 » by HeartBreakKid » Sat Feb 13, 2021 1:20 pm

The past playoffs were super negative. It was seldom about how good someone played and more about how crappy the other guy was.
User avatar
Goudelock
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,306
And1: 20,938
Joined: Jan 27, 2015
Location: College of Charleston
 

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1104 » by Goudelock » Sat Feb 13, 2021 5:49 pm

Inspektor1312 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:...

As I said, it's why I took a little social media break, this subforum is a bit better but on the whole... NBA discourse is kind of bad.


Oh no, people on the internet are critiquing NBA players, how awful and inconsiderate!


There's a difference between critiquing, and having 95% of the discourse on the NBA be about how X player is overrated or Y player's legacy is ruined.

Going from NFL discussions after games, and NBA discussions after games is night and day.
Devin Booker wrote:Bro.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1105 » by bondom34 » Sat Feb 13, 2021 6:32 pm

Inspektor1312 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:...

As I said, it's why I took a little social media break, this subforum is a bit better but on the whole... NBA discourse is kind of bad.


Oh no, people on the internet are critiquing NBA players, how awful and inconsiderate!

Yeah, this isn't it.

There's a difference between critique and discussion and "lolz this guy choked and can't get it done he doesn't have the killer instinct and isn't a winning player!".

One is talking about a game, one is a vague statement that can't be refuted and provides no information.

If people want to surround themselves with poor logic and negativity, I guess cool. I just don't see the benefit.

I'm not sure how someone can look at discourse about some of this stuff and think it's critique and not just got takey statements.

Edit: Going to current statements:

Russell Westbrook has never won a playoff series without Durant/isn't a winner/etc (whatever the flavor of the day is on this one): This is a no context/poorly thought out statement that dismisses most of a player's career. Also a false one.

CP3 has never made a finals: Same, and offers nothing of substance.

Donovan Mitchell doesn't have what it takes: Same (lesser level but still).

None of this is actually good discourse, it's all meant to misframe or reframe history or current events in a way that both can't be refuted and offers nothing of substance or context. It's stuff I'd expect from someone with no understanding of basketball and no real desire to discuss it. Someone just wants to either invoke emotion or get a desired response. Any of these players can be critiqued, but none of these statements are actual critiques.

HeartBreakKid wrote:The past playoffs were super negative. It was seldom about how good someone played and more about how crappy the other guy was.


Also this. Sometimes a team plays well and should get credit. Maybe Giannis doesn't actually suck and the Bucks were good but the Heat were just playing fantastic basketball. Or maybe he will never win and has no skill. Idk, one of these sounds more valid, but the other is what was out there
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,659
And1: 99,077
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1106 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Feb 13, 2021 7:23 pm

Inspektor1312 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:...

As I said, it's why I took a little social media break, this subforum is a bit better but on the whole... NBA discourse is kind of bad.


Oh no, people on the internet are critiquing NBA players, how awful and inconsiderate!


That's a miss.

Critique is always welcome and has long been a significant part of this board.

The level of dialogue that has largely taken hold isn't remotely critique. It's hot takes, agendas, and hate posts. Maybe that's for you. Clearly its extremely popular.

But its fair for those of us who have strove for something more meaningful to bemoan this loss.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,469
And1: 9,979
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1107 » by penbeast0 » Sat Feb 13, 2021 11:59 pm

bondom34 wrote:...Russell Westbrook has never won a playoff series without Durant/isn't a winner/etc (whatever the flavor of the day is on this one): This is a no context/poorly thought out statement that dismisses most of a player's career. Also a false one....


How do you feel about this?

Russell Westbrook so far this year, despite his supermax salary, has played poorly and with extremely low BBIQ. He is still high energy, rebounding and dominating the ball, but he continues to shoot high volumes at very low efficiency and turns the ball over a lot. His defense hasn't been very good either.

It's hard to put a positive spin on ANYTHING related to the Wizards other than Bradley Beal (and maybe Deni Advija's having some potential) considering how they are playing.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1108 » by bondom34 » Sun Feb 14, 2021 1:28 am

penbeast0 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:...Russell Westbrook has never won a playoff series without Durant/isn't a winner/etc (whatever the flavor of the day is on this one): This is a no context/poorly thought out statement that dismisses most of a player's career. Also a false one....


How do you feel about this?

Russell Westbrook so far this year, despite his supermax salary, has played poorly and with extremely low BBIQ. He is still high energy, rebounding and dominating the ball, but he continues to shoot high volumes at very low efficiency and turns the ball over a lot. His defense hasn't been very good either.

It's hard to put a positive spin on ANYTHING related to the Wizards other than Bradley Beal (and maybe Deni Advija's having some potential) considering how they are playing.

Honestly haven't watched them much, but doesn't sound like slander (I'm not a fan of the term poor BBIQ, but that's more a general thing, I think it goes a bit beyond just shot selection and the like...its been something said for years on him and a term I try to avoid using due to being nonspecific, he has poor shot selection at times but idk if that's all it means, in the context you're using everything is meant in a constructive fashion generally and not speaking in total extremes). It also notes some actual strengths too.

And as stated, he's been poor this year so is kind of a weird example on my own part but when I was speaking on him it was more historically. Things said on him I'd consider more revisionist that were stated in the OKC days (ie when he was with Durant and constantly was the only one to take blame, or even into his MVP year when it was basically settled into him being labeled in some corners as nothing but a stat-padding loser with no nuance).

Slander, or I suppose to state it better just dumbing down the discourse is something like I'd stated. An actual criticism of a player's game (and this year he's certainly been poor) is entirely fair.

Examples are something like:

Spoiler:
"Donovan Mitchell at times gets tunnel vision and doesn't get teammates involved as much as is needed." = Fair

"Donovan Mitchell doesn't have what it takes and is a no defense chucker." = A poorly thought out statement of no substance

"Westbrook (historically, now he's fallen off) has a penchant for some poor shot selection and can get tunnel vision and over aggressive at times." = Fair.

"Westbrook isn't a playoff performer and hasn't won anything." = Poorly thought out.

"Chris Paul at times may need to show more aggressiveness toward scoring and might be in a way overly passive." = Fair.

"Chris Paul is a playoff choker." = Poorly thought out.

"Paul George has had some dreadful playoff performances but overall has generally been efficient and been a very large positive defensively." is also a fair statement.

"Paul George is a loser." offers nothing of substance.

A common example is something even like using Lebron's finals record to his detriment. Or most of the takes from the 2017 MVP race ended up being largely of this fashion and the whole thing turned into a glorified pissing contest (pardon the French) which would more classify as "slander" I'd say toward Westbrook because he was actually a highly positive impact player at that point. Or even the Giannis MVP year the first time too. Or heck even many current Westbrook arguments tend to misconstrue history terribly (especially regarding playoff success) and I'd have no idea how he's a top 50 player all time, the same goes for a guy like CP3 and Harden (or George for a lesser all time player). Or like saying Kyrie Irving is better than Curry m because he hit the shot in the finals.

The CP3 ones are some of the worst.

Edited to add some other notes, but also this OP you locked today is the sort of thing I'd note :D:

viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2052168&start=40

In all of these one thing I think generally is something I'd see on this subforum, which is a good thing. One is just misrepresenting history and is far more prominent in media and social media today. Something like the OP you'd locked on Dirk, which is exactly what this forum isn't supposed to be about, is what I'd look at in a poor light. An actual substantive criticism is possible of any player, even a Lebron or Jordan. Not sure if you're around other social media or even other forums here, but a lot more of that is around than actual discussion. Hope that clarifies.

Trying to see it from the POV of someone who tries to remain objective but at the same time my favorite player the last few years was taking the brunt of some weird revisionism was annoying, and now it's only getting worse with current players. There can be no nuance, only extremes (and saying this as someone who as a fan of Westbrook has seen/sees it on both sides at times). And if I'm crazy here anyone feel free to call me on it but social media is a weird place for the NBA and this is just how the game gets discussed oftentimes.

To add....from what I've heard and seen, Avidja looked like he was playing pretty well. Brooks looked entirely outmatched and I was a fan of his in OKC too. And yep, Westbrook's been....rough I guess will put it lightly lol. But hope they can pull something together around Beal there.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1109 » by bondom34 » Sun Feb 14, 2021 2:32 am

Granted, some of this is a pet peeves, especially the general hot take nature of discussion in places. Saying that, actually substantial criticism is fine, and even to be encouraged in many times
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1110 » by bondom34 » Sun Feb 14, 2021 4:07 am

And on actual season notes I'm both starting to get a little excited for the Knicks and thinking even as high as I was on Utah preseason (had them 3rd) maybe I was too low. Wondered what would happen when the 3 point shooting cooled off, they're shooting 10-41 tonight and up 18.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,659
And1: 99,077
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1111 » by Texas Chuck » Sun Feb 14, 2021 4:47 am

Utah Jazz. Beautiful, dominant basketball. I love this team.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1112 » by bondom34 » Sun Feb 14, 2021 5:20 am

Texas Chuck wrote:Utah Jazz. Beautiful, dominant basketball. I love this team.

Correction: Utah Globetrotters.

Just passing circles around folks.

Read on Twitter
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Statlanta
RealGM
Posts: 13,872
And1: 10,501
Joined: Mar 06, 2016

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1113 » by Statlanta » Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:41 am

Given how the 2015 Hawks, the 2016 Spurs, the 2016 Warriors and 2018 Rockets all flamed out, I have no trust in the Utah team. It’s this era where SRS and trying hard in the regular season doesn’t mean a thing. We will all do the same dance once the Lakers eliminate them in 6 games.
The Greatest of All Time debate in basketball is essentially who has the greatest basketball resume of the player who has the best highlights instead of who is the best player
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,828
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1114 » by HeartBreakKid » Sun Feb 14, 2021 9:49 am

Statlanta wrote:Given how the 2015 Hawks, the 2016 Spurs, the 2016 Warriors and 2018 Rockets all flamed out, I have no trust in the Utah team. It’s this era where SRS and trying hard in the regular season doesn’t mean a thing. We will all do the same dance once the Lakers eliminate them in 6 games.

I'd hardly say the 2016 Warriors and 2018 Rockets flamed out they were incredibly close to winning titles. Also, the Rockets were more of an iso team.
User avatar
Dupp
RealGM
Posts: 112,394
And1: 67,144
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Location: Lifelong Nuggets Fan
 

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1115 » by Dupp » Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:26 am

Jazz are great but don’t see any chance at the finals.


Anyway what do people think of hardens scoring drop off? He got a lot of slander about his play in Houston. Too selfish etc. now he seems happy to take less shots and share it as much as possible.

Seems like it was mostly all unwarranted and he was doing what he had too with an inept scoring cast.
MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,034
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1116 » by MyUniBroDavis » Sun Feb 14, 2021 10:35 am

Seeing That video with butler singing 1000 miles with kyrie made me like kyrie again lol
User avatar
AdagioPace
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,876
And1: 7,424
Joined: Jan 03, 2017
Location: Contado di Molise
   

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1117 » by AdagioPace » Sun Feb 14, 2021 11:09 am

bondom34 wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:Utah Jazz. Beautiful, dominant basketball. I love this team.

Correction: Utah Globetrotters.

Just passing circles around folks.

Read on Twitter


2014 Spurs ---> 2015 Warriors ---> 2021 Jazz.

passing the torch
Of course, no guarantee of a championship but you're going to get a lot of support from neutrals playing this way
"La natura gode della natura; la natura trionfa sulla natura; la natura domina la natura" - Ostanes
User avatar
Inspektor1312
Pro Prospect
Posts: 852
And1: 1,498
Joined: Feb 02, 2018
Location: Србија
   

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1118 » by Inspektor1312 » Sun Feb 14, 2021 12:25 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
Inspektor1312 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:...

As I said, it's why I took a little social media break, this subforum is a bit better but on the whole... NBA discourse is kind of bad.


Oh no, people on the internet are critiquing NBA players, how awful and inconsiderate!


That's a miss.

Critique is always welcome and has long been a significant part of this board.

The level of dialogue that has largely taken hold isn't remotely critique. It's hot takes, agendas, and hate posts. Maybe that's for you. Clearly its extremely popular.

But its fair for those of us who have strove for something more meaningful to bemoan this loss.


Yeah, of course there are hot takes, that's always been the case. But OP was just putting a million vague criticisms together to make a strawman point.

"Chris Paul never made the finals" is literally a fact. "Kawhi won in '14 because of the Spurs system" - another fact. How people use those facts and why is a different story.

If you don't like the discourse that's happening on this site, you're not going to change it by simply complaining about it. The only way to do it is by creating your idea of meaningful discourse. Nothing's stopping anyone here to start a serious analysis of something.
MO12msu
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,410
And1: 655
Joined: Jun 25, 2013
     

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1119 » by MO12msu » Sun Feb 14, 2021 2:38 pm

HeartBreakKid wrote:
Statlanta wrote:Given how the 2015 Hawks, the 2016 Spurs, the 2016 Warriors and 2018 Rockets all flamed out, I have no trust in the Utah team. It’s this era where SRS and trying hard in the regular season doesn’t mean a thing. We will all do the same dance once the Lakers eliminate them in 6 games.

I'd hardly say the 2016 Warriors and 2018 Rockets flamed out they were incredibly close to winning titles. Also, the Rockets were more of an iso team.

Yeah I don’t see much of any similarities between any of those teams. Odd bunch to group together.
User avatar
eminence
RealGM
Posts: 17,103
And1: 11,899
Joined: Mar 07, 2015

Re: 2020-21 NBA Season Discussion 

Post#1120 » by eminence » Sun Feb 14, 2021 3:17 pm

I wouldn't say the '16 Spurs flamed out either, they played a pretty close series against a really strong OKC team.

Overall I'd be reasonably happy with a 6 game loss in the CF to the Lakers. Obviously I'm hoping for more, but that would not be a bad season by any means.
I bought a boat.

Return to Player Comparisons