Mr Puddles wrote:Lalouie wrote:cp3 is why booker and the suns are on the radar this year
people pay attention when you're 20-10
they don't pay attention when you're[b] 11-19[/b]
I love this
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Mr Puddles wrote:Lalouie wrote:cp3 is why booker and the suns are on the radar this year
people pay attention when you're 20-10
they don't pay attention when you're[b] 11-19[/b]
Jkam31 wrote:CIN-C-STAR wrote:He's been good, but DeRozan has been better and is on a team that's doing better and I dont hear anyone complaining about him getting snubbed.
It's not an egregious omission by any means.
All Star selections are largely a popularity contest anyway. If you guys feel so strongly about it you should have been voting for him 3 times a day on Twitter or whatever nonsense the NBA does for the fan voting aspect of it.
I stopped voting after middle school
SunsLyf3 wrote:CIN-C-STAR wrote:He's been good, but DeRozan has been better and is on a team that's doing better and I dont hear anyone complaining about him getting snubbed.
It's not an egregious omission by any means.
All Star selections are largely a popularity contest anyway. If you guys feel so strongly about it you should have been voting for him 3 times a day on Twitter or whatever nonsense the NBA does for the fan voting aspect of it.
How are the Spurs doing better?
BoatsNZones wrote:CP is clearly better offensively, defensively and as a team leader for them. He also crushes him in all advanced stats. Booker puts up a handful more points per game. He's not better than Paul.
Mr Puddles wrote:Lalouie wrote:cp3 is why booker and the suns are on the radar this year
people pay attention when you're 20-10
they don't pay attention when you're[b] 11-19[/b]
SunsLyf3 wrote:CIN-C-STAR wrote:He's been good, but DeRozan has been better and is on a team that's doing better and I dont hear anyone complaining about him getting snubbed.
It's not an egregious omission by any means.
All Star selections are largely a popularity contest anyway. If you guys feel so strongly about it you should have been voting for him 3 times a day on Twitter or whatever nonsense the NBA does for the fan voting aspect of it.
How are the Spurs doing better?
Seattlesun wrote:Lalouie wrote:Lunartic wrote:He's got weird black beady soulless eyes but he should have been an all-star this year
you noticed too, eh.
Do you guys feel a need to be physically attracted to NBA players?
jsierra1985 wrote:anyone that thinks book shouldnt be in.....
just log off
CIN-C-STAR wrote:He's been good, but DeRozan has been better and I dont hear anyone complaining about him getting snubbed.
It's not an egregious omission by any means.
All Star selections are largely a popularity contest anyway. If you guys feel so strongly about it you should have been voting for him 3 times a day on Twitter or whatever nonsense the NBA does for the fan voting aspect of it.
SunsLyf3 wrote:CIN-C-STAR wrote:He's been good, but DeRozan has been better and is on a team that's doing better and I dont hear anyone complaining about him getting snubbed.
It's not an egregious omission by any means.
All Star selections are largely a popularity contest anyway. If you guys feel so strongly about it you should have been voting for him 3 times a day on Twitter or whatever nonsense the NBA does for the fan voting aspect of it.
How are the Spurs doing better?