Lunartic wrote:He's got weird black beady soulless eyes but he should have been an all-star this year

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Lunartic wrote:He's got weird black beady soulless eyes but he should have been an all-star this year

KembaWalker wrote:If you think you need a gun to answer the door, you probably shouldn’t answer the door. Call the police
 
                                                                                                           
                                                                                                           
                                                                                                           
 
 
                                                                                            
               Lockdown504090 wrote:jsierra1985 wrote:anyone that thinks book shouldnt be in.....
just log off
over who tho?
 
                    
                    
                    
                                                    KGtabake wrote:I love the fact that both Booker and Young were snubbed. They are both irritating for different reasons. Booker has a cocky attitude, often gets into trash talks and fights when he hasn't done absolutely nothing all these years to back it up. Young has pissed off the entire universe with the calls he's getting.
I enjoyed it, i don't care. Serves them right.
And yes, i do recognise that they are both insane offensive talents.

 
                                      
                                      
                    
                
                                      
                                                        
               darmani wrote:Lockdown504090 wrote:jsierra1985 wrote:anyone that thinks book shouldnt be in.....
just log off
over who tho?
Mitchell, CP3 or Zion
 2nd best player on the best team in the league, really?! I can see Zion but that’s it.
 2nd best player on the best team in the league, really?! I can see Zion but that’s it. 
                                      
                                                        
               NY 567 wrote:Chris Paul is clearly the guy on the Suns. That said, the Suns are balling, and you could argue that they deserve a 2nd all star. I'd have rather him gotten in over Zion, but the media is all in on the Zion train.
 
                                      
                                                        
               Maze wrote:CIN-C-STAR wrote:He's been good, but DeRozan has been better and I dont hear anyone complaining about him getting snubbed.
It's not an egregious omission by any means.
All Star selections are largely a popularity contest anyway. If you guys feel so strongly about it you should have been voting for him 3 times a day on Twitter or whatever nonsense the NBA does for the fan voting aspect of it.
DeRozan: 20 5 7 on 49/33/90 splits
Booker 25 4 5 on 50/38/ 84 splits.
How has DeRozan been better? Plus Booker's team has a better record.
 
   
  
 
                                                                                                           
                                                                                                           
                                      
                                                        
               Seattlesun wrote:We can stop saying Dev should have got in over Zion. Zion was a front court vote that Dev was not eligible for.
Dev did start slow this season acclimating to actually having NBA caliber running mates. A case could be made he should be in over Mitchell but the Jazz have just won too much.
And all you homos stop talking about his appearance. It’s good enough for him to be bangin Kendall Jenner. And you?
 
  Zion was a wild card.
 Zion was a wild card. 
                                      
                                      
                
                                                                                                          TravisScott55 wrote:That team sucked before Chris got there, and would suck if Chris wasn't there this season.
 
                                      
                                      
               Biff wrote:TravisScott55 wrote:That team sucked before Chris got there, and would suck if Chris wasn't there this season.
I don't agree. We were a different team in the bubble and had we carried over the same roster, I think we'd still be good. We're obviously better with CP3 but we had chemistry issues early on as they adjusted to each other. I think we're better than our record indicates, probably should be 22-8 or 23-7. But we almost made the playoffs last year and that was with ayton, baynes and kaminsky all missing damn near half the season, leaving us super thin in the frontcourt. If we carried over the chemistry into this season, we probably would have made the playoffs, just as a lower seed.