VooDoo7 wrote:Jrue ain't going nowhere.
He has spoken.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
                   
                   
                                                       
               VooDoo7 wrote:Jrue ain't going nowhere.
paulpressey25 wrote:skones wrote:I repeat. So so so SO stupid to sign Jrue to sign a long term extension right now.
So you want to let him get to free agency, and risk losing him for nothing?
Was not a fan of that trade, but at this point we're all in. He's still a borderline all-star player. We just have to pay up.
skones wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:skones wrote:I repeat. So so so SO stupid to sign Jrue to sign a long term extension right now.
So you want to let him get to free agency, and risk losing him for nothing?
Was not a fan of that trade, but at this point we're all in. He's still a borderline all-star player. We just have to pay up.
Sunk. Cost. Fallacy.
You want to throw the boat at a team that doesn't look like they can win anything at current? No, you don't have to pay up.
slos wrote:The fascination in Porzingis or Oladipo comes with the buy low status they currently have. You love it if one of these guys come to Milwaukee without touching our Jrue/Donte/Midds/Giannis core taking into account the limited assets we have left.
                   
                   
                                                       
               
                   
                   
                   
                                     
               ShootingtheJ wrote:skones wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:
So you want to let him get to free agency, and risk losing him for nothing?
Was not a fan of that trade, but at this point we're all in. He's still a borderline all-star player. We just have to pay up.
Sunk. Cost. Fallacy.
You want to throw the boat at a team that doesn't look like they can win anything at current? No, you don't have to pay up.
He's a trade asset the second he's resigned, and we gain nothing by letting him walk. We still wouldn't have cap space, because Giannis and Middleton have huge, well deserved, contracts.
I could care less if whether we picked Jrue up on waivers or traded 3 firsts for him, he's a terrific player and asset. He'll be resigned, he's not going anywhere.
ShootingtheJ wrote:skones wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:
So you want to let him get to free agency, and risk losing him for nothing?
Was not a fan of that trade, but at this point we're all in. He's still a borderline all-star player. We just have to pay up.
Sunk. Cost. Fallacy.
You want to throw the boat at a team that doesn't look like they can win anything at current? No, you don't have to pay up.
He's a trade asset the second he's resigned,
skones wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:skones wrote:
Sunk. Cost. Fallacy.
You want to throw the boat at a team that doesn't look like they can win anything at current? No, you don't have to pay up.
He's a trade asset the second he's resigned,
He's not. The second he's resigned teams will say, "That's a lot of money for a guy who's 31."
ShootingtheJ wrote:skones wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:
He's a trade asset the second he's resigned,
He's not. The second he's resigned teams will say, "That's a lot of money for a guy who's 31."
The net of the Chris Paul trade was 2- 1sts and 2- 2nds, and he was 35.
                   
                   
                                                       
               skones wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:skones wrote:
He's not. The second he's resigned teams will say, "That's a lot of money for a guy who's 31."
The net of the Chris Paul trade was 2- 1sts and 2- 2nds, and he was 35.
I don't know why I need to say this, but Jrue Holiday isn't Chris Paul and he didn't have 4 years left on his deal. Need I remind you that Houston had to attach two firsts and two swaps just to downgrade to Russell Westbrook?
Khris Middleton had negative value on his new deal until he demonstrated he made a leap forward. Tobias Harris had negative value on his new deal. Jrue Holiday will be the same.
ShootingtheJ wrote:skones wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:
The net of the Chris Paul trade was 2- 1sts and 2- 2nds, and he was 35.
I don't know why I need to say this, but Jrue Holiday isn't Chris Paul and he didn't have 4 years left on his deal. Need I remind you that Houston had to attach two firsts and two swaps just to downgrade to Russell Westbrook?
Khris Middleton had negative value on his new deal until he demonstrated he made a leap forward. Tobias Harris had negative value on his new deal. Jrue Holiday will be the same.
Nothing you said here was true. Jrue is better than Paul, defense matters. Houston thought Westbrook was better. KM and TB were never negative value.
skones wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:skones wrote:
I don't know why I need to say this, but Jrue Holiday isn't Chris Paul and he didn't have 4 years left on his deal. Need I remind you that Houston had to attach two firsts and two swaps just to downgrade to Russell Westbrook?
Khris Middleton had negative value on his new deal until he demonstrated he made a leap forward. Tobias Harris had negative value on his new deal. Jrue Holiday will be the same.
Nothing you said here was true. Jrue is better than Paul, defense matters. Houston thought Westbrook was better. KM and TB were never negative value.
No, everything I said was true. I legitimately lol'd at Jrue is better than Paul. Go ahead and take a peek at the Middleton and Harris deal threads on the GB and Trade Board.
                   
                   
                   
                                     
               ShootingtheJ wrote:skones wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:
Nothing you said here was true. Jrue is better than Paul, defense matters. Houston thought Westbrook was better. KM and TB were never negative value.
No, everything I said was true. I legitimately lol'd at Jrue is better than Paul. Go ahead and take a peek at the Middleton and Harris deal threads on the GB and Trade Board.
I don't need to look at what's said on trade board, that proves nothing, history does. Jrue is better than Paul, defense matters. Just because you laugh doesn't mean you're right.
                   
                   
                   
                                     
               skones wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:skones wrote:
No, everything I said was true. I legitimately lol'd at Jrue is better than Paul. Go ahead and take a peek at the Middleton and Harris deal threads on the GB and Trade Board.
I don't need to look at what's said on trade board, that proves nothing, history does. Jrue is better than Paul, defense matters. Just because you laugh doesn't mean you're right.
Right, so you have a consensus opinion on these deals being negative, but they "don't matter." I again LOL'ed, all caps this time, at Jrue is better than Paul. It's hilarious you keep saying, "defense matters" like Chris Paul hasn't been named to 9 NBA All Defense teams in his career. You're painting him as some slouch on that end of the floor when he is certainly not. Chris Paul is world's better on the offensive end of the floor. Jrue is merely better on the defensive end.
Chris Paul at 35 years old, has Phoenix winning on a +20 win pace over last year. He legitimately wins wherever he goes, I don't know how you can possibly argue that Jrue Holiday is better, but here you are, and it's a joke.
                   
                   
                   
                                     
               
                                     
                                                       
               Stop useing logic. That kinda talk has no place in this discussionMVP2110 wrote:If Jrue was a free agent how many teams would be offering him a max deal. Same with when Khris was a free agent. If that answer is more than just us then that immediately means the deal isn't negative value