Post#1499 » by scrabbarista » Mon Mar 1, 2021 5:33 pm 
            
            
            As of the morning of March 1st, with movement in the last week.
----------------------------------------------------
1. 25.4 - Jokic, DEN
2. 21.4 - Embiid, PHI
3. 20.4 - Antetokounmpo, MIL +3
4. 19.8 - Leonard, LAC -1
5. 19.7 - James, LAL -1
6. 19.5 - Gobert, UTA -1
7. 16.9 - Lillard, POR
8. 16.8 - Curry, GSW +3
9. 16.4 - Conley, UTA -1
10. 15.8 - Harden, BKN -1
11. 15.6 - George, LAC -1
12. 14.9 - Paul, PHO +10
13. 14.8 - Irving, BKN +4
14. 14.7 - Randle, NYK -1
15. 14.4 - Doncic, DAL -2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jokic continues to expand his lead while everyone on RGM continues to pretend he doesn't exist.
Antetokounmpo makes a giant leap into true contention.
Curry and Chris Paul made big jumps, though neither is in contention (with the top six) at the moment.
James had some good showings and some bad ones - as he has all season. Somehow, he seems to be the only player whose good showings "cancel out" his bad ones within the general narrative. Every other player seems to have their bad points "cancel out" their good ones. That's my impression reading this thread, anyway.
NOTE: Particularly outside of the top six, movement can be very dependent on what the surrounding players did that week, as well as on how big the gaps between players were before the week started. Sometimes a player will play great for a week, his score will go up, and his ranking will drop (maybe Randle, this week). Or, vice versa: a player will play poorly, his score will drop, and his ranking won't move (maybe Lillard, this week). Also note that the further down the list one goes, the more bunched up the scores are. That's how someone like Chris Paul can jump ten players on the strength of just one strong week.
DISCLAIMERS:
1) This formula is not designed to determine the best players. It's an MVP formula, designed to choose an MVP, and - to a lesser extent - to identify the top five MVP candidates. It does that job well: it matches 10 of the last 12 winners, with the two exceptions being 2011 and 2017 - definitely the two most controversial, narrative-driven MVP's in recent memory.
2) The number of games a team has played can be an important factor here in such a weird season. More games equals more opportunity to provide value to your team. There are large discrepancies between the number of games some teams have played.
            
                                    
                                    All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.